Monitoring Programme Sample Clauses

Monitoring Programme. 10.1 The Japanese and Korean end-users will monitor the STS cargoes and shall report on the outcome of the monitoring programme within one month after delivery of the last of the last STS trial cargo. SCHEDULE 3 - AN EXPLANATION OF CLAUSE 7 WITH EXAMPLES OF LAYTIME CALCULATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLAUSE 10. When is a nomination valid and how is this calculated? Clause 7 defines when a nomination is deemed to be valid. This is different from the time the nomination is actually received. The formula in this clause was introduced to eliminate the unfairness caused when a buyer received a nomination just before close of business at 18.00 hrs. In the original contract, any nomination passed on after 18.00 hrs was only valid from 10.00 hrs on the next business day. The company holding the nomination at 18.00 hrs could be liable for one day’s demurrage or for three days if it happened to be a Friday. The current contract formula avoids this unfairness by spreading the responsibility for demurrage for each day between the companies holding the nomination from 10.00 hrs to 18.00 hrs on Mondays to Thursdays and for the weekend between companies holding the nomination during working hours on a Friday. The formula “V = 1000 hrs plus (T times Y times 3)” works as follows: Take, for example, a nomination which is received at 12.00 hrs on Thursday 27/06. It is actually valid (V), according to this formula at 16.00 hrs on that day. The calculation is: T = 12.00 – 10.00 = 2.00 (the time between 10.00 hrs on the day of nomination and the time the nomination is actually received). Y = 1 (which is the number of calendar days between 10.00 hrs on the day of nomination and 10.00 hrs on the next working day). The nomination is valid, i.e. “V” in the formula, at 10.00 + (2.00 x 1 x 3) = 16.00 hrs on 27/06. If the nomination has been received at 12.00 hrs Friday, 28/06, “T” would still be 2.00 but “Y” would be 3, since the next working day would be Monday, 01/07. The nomination would therefore be valid, “V”, at 10.00 + (2.00 x 3 x 3) = 04.00 hrs on 29/06. The “x3” in the formula is included because responsibility for each 24 hours is spread over nominations held during the 8 hour working day from 10.00 hrs to 18.00. The effect is that every minute the nomination is held during working hours from Mondays to Thursdays carries responsibility, potentially, for demurrage for 3 minutes. On a Friday this increases to 9 minutes. Deemed NOR The “Deemed NOR” is the time of the expiration of ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Monitoring Programme. Stage Monitoring Task Monitoring Report Form of Approval Frequency Detailed Design Checking of design works against the recommendations of the landscape and visual impact assessments within the EIA should be undertaken during detailed design phase and tender stage, to ensure that they fulfil the intention of the mitigation measures. Any changes to the design, including design changes on site should also be checked. Not Required Not Required At the end of the Detailed Design Phase Construction Checking of the contractor’s operations during the construction period. Report on Contractor's compliance, by ET Counter- signature of report by IEC Weekly Notes:  Environmental Team (ET) – employed by the Contractor;
Sample 1
Monitoring Programme. Monitoring of population parameters and harvest is the prerequisite for assessing the population response to management actions and for successful Adaptive Harvest Management. The application of the Adaptive Harvest Management programme for TBG is based on available estimates of population size in mid-winter and harvest bag. This simple model is the first step in applying AHM for the sub-species. More and higher quality data will be needed to produce more complex models so that the Adaptive Harvest Management programme benefits from higher rigor. To support and further strengthen the implementation of the iterative phase of the AHM, reliable annual estimates of 1) population size in January and 2) harvest bag, need to be regularly provided as a matter of essential priority to allow informed decision making. In addition, monitoring of survival and reproductive success/age ratio can increase the precision of predictive models and it is recommended that schemes are developed to provide sufficient datasets on these parameters for more detailed modelling. It is essential that the population size estimate in January and the harvest bag data separate the two sub- species (Taiga fabalis and Tundra rossicus). The annual decision-making process requires rapid data flow from field counts to national co-ordinators and ultimately to the European Goose Management Platform Data Centre. Quality assured data from the January counts on population size and the harvest bag from the previous season should be available to the Data Centre for processing no later than 15 May each year. In the face of lack of hunting bag data from spring hunting in Belarus and Russia, the xxxxxx xxxxxxx will be estimated on the basis of recoveries of marked birds.
Sample 1
Monitoring Programme. 59. Range states reported on various aspects of monitoring in their countries, such as the problems related to separating Taiga and Tundra Bean Geese, which could be done using feather collection and analysis, the submission of smart phone photos and the best timing for counts. Xxxxxxxxx Xxx informed those present of the availability of telemetry devices, which could be used for TBG monitoring.
Sample 1
Monitoring Programme. 11.12 The Commissioner will be looking to work with the Contractor towards maintaining and continuous improvement in their performance throughout the duration of the contract.
Sample 1
Monitoring Programme. Monitoring of population parameters and harvest is the prerequisite for assessing the population response to management actions and for successful Adaptive Harvest Management. The application of the Adaptive Harvest Management programme for TBG is based on available estimates of population size in mid-winter and harvest bag. This simple model is the first step in applying AHM for the sub-species. More and higher quality data will be needed to produce more complex models so that the Adaptive Harvest Management programme benefits from higher rigor. To support and further strengthen the implementation of the iterative phase of the AHM, reliable annual estimates of 1) population size in January and 2) harvest bag, need to be regularly provided as a matter of essential priority to allow informed decision making. In addition, monitoring of survival and reproductive success/age ratio can increase the precision of predictive models and it is recommended that schemes are developed to provide sufficient datasets on these parameters for more detailed modelling. It is essential that the population size estimate in January and the harvest bag data separate the two sub- species (Taiga fabalis and Tundra rossicus). The annual decision-making process requires rapid data flow from field counts to national co-ordinators and ultimately to the European Goose Management Platform Data Centre. Quality assured data from the January counts on population size and the harvest bag from the previous season should be available to the Data Centre for processing no later than 15 May each year. In the face of lack of hunting bag data from spring hunting in Belarus and Russia, the xxxxxx xxxxxxx will be estimated on the basis of recoveries of marked birds. Should a management alternative with harvest rate above zero be adopted for the Central MU, for 2017 there needs to be a ‘fast-track’ process to provide January population data and harvest bag by early March to allow sufficient time for decision-making with regard to the 2017 hunting season. Table 6 below presents an outline of the proposed monitoring programme for the TBG which, upon adoption, will require further planning and development. Certain elements of the monitoring programme are essential for improved AHM and shall be launched as soon as possible. Others are recommendable and their timelines for development and launch are more relaxed. The overall coordination to the monitoring programme will be provided by the EGMP Data Centre...
Sample 1

Related to Monitoring Programme

  • Monitoring Plan keep up with the objectives from the cadetship practice booklet; taking daily notes as well as learning new information every day; currently reporting to the supervisor. Evaluation plan: the final result should be in accordance with the traineeship’s aims and objectives, achieving an improvement of specialty knowledge and language skills. The level of language competence9 in English that the trainee already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the mobility period is: A1 ☐ A2 ☐ B1 ☐ B2 ☒ C1 ☐ C2 ☐ Native speaker ☐ Table B - Sending Institution Please use only one of the following three boxes: 10 The traineeship is embedded in the curriculum and upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to:Award ……...…ECTS credits (or equivalent)11 Give a grade based on: Traineeship certificate ☒ Final report ☒ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records and Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☒ No ☐ The traineeship is voluntary and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Give a grade: Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate if this will be based on: Traineeship certificate ☐ Final report ☐ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records: Yes ☐ No ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☐ No ☐ The traineeship is carried out by a recent graduate and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document (highly recommended): Yes ☐ No ☐ Accident insurance for the trainee The Sending Institution will provide an accident insurance to the trainee (if not provided by the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise): Yes ☐ No ☒ The accident insurance covers: - accidents during travels made for work purposes: Yes ☐ No ☒ - accidents on the way to work and back from work: Yes ☐ No ☒

  • Mentoring Program It is recognized that the induction of new teachers through a formalized mentoring program will help to promote excellence in teaching and improve student achievement. The focus of this program will be to build a supportive environment for new teachers within the context of school improvement. Veteran teachers may be asked or encouraged to mentor a new staff member but will not be required to do so. Mentors will be compensated for this work N. Moving Classrooms: Employees who are asked to change classrooms or offices will be provided the assistance of district personnel in moving boxes and/or large items.

  • Training Program It is agreed that there shall be an Apprenticeship Training Program, the provisions of which are set forth in Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and forms part of this Agreement.

  • Maintenance Programme 17.4.1 On or before COD and no later than 45 (forty five) days prior to the beginning of each Accounting Year during the Operation Period, as the case may be, the Concessionaire shall provide to the Authority and the Independent Engineer, its proposed annual programme of preventive, urgent and other scheduled maintenance (the “Maintenance Programme”) to comply with the Maintenance Requirements, Maintenance Manual and Safety Requirements. Such Maintenance Programme shall include:

  • Programme 13.1 Within the time stated in the Contract Data, the Contractor shall submit to the Engineer for approval a Programme showing the general methods, arrangements,' order and timing for all the activities for the construction of works.

  • Monitoring Services IDT staff shall, using methods that include face-to-face and other contacts with the member, monitor the services a member receives. This monitoring shall ensure that:

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Monitoring and Review 5.1 The Council and the BID Company shall set up the Standard Services Review Panel within 28 days from the date of this Agreement the purpose of which shall be to:

  • Implementation Program 1. The Borrower shall:

  • Monitoring Compliance Upon the request of the Lender, but without incurring any liability beyond the Guaranteed Obligations, from time to time, Guarantor shall promptly provide to the Lender such documents, certificates and other information as may be deemed reasonably necessary to enable the Lender to perform its functions under the Servicing Agreement as the same relates to the Guarantor.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.