Off-Channel Chum Habitat Development and Improvement Program Sample Clauses

Off-Channel Chum Habitat Development and Improvement Program. 7.3.4.1 The Parties agree to a phased approach to examine off-channel chum habitat development and improvement. WDFW and the Tribes shall be the Program Co-Managers. The first phase of this process will be a site inventory, evaluation and ranking. The inventory will include review of existing information such as inventory lists compiled by the City, SSC, WDFW, WDW, NPS, and the USFS. Additional field inventory may be necessary. The inventory study of potential site improvements or developments will not be limited to new spawning channels (e.g., Park Slough). Consideration will also be given to improving access to off-channel or tributary habitat that is presently inaccessible or under-utilized. Sites will be ranked based an evaluation of cost effectiveness, species utilization, engineering, and other feasibility factors. Prior to implementation of the inventory and evaluation phase, the NCC will approve the site ranking criteria to be used. Once the site inventory and evaluation phase has been completed, the NCC shall be responsible for ranking candidate sites and for any refinement of the ranking list.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Off-Channel Chum Habitat Development and Improvement Program

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Construction Development of the Project The Allottee has seen the proposed layout plan/demarcation-cum-zoning/sanctioned plans, / site plan / building plan, specifications, amenities and facilities, etc. depicted in the advertisement / brochure / agreement / website (as the case may be) regarding the Project where the Said Independent Floor for residential usage along with parking is located and has accepted the floor / site plan, Payment Plan and the specifications, amenities, facilities, etc. [annexed along with this Agreement] which has been approved by the competent authority, as represented by the Promoter. The Promoter shall develop the Project in accordance with the bye-laws such as Haryana Building Code, 2017, FAR, density norms, provisions prescribed, approved plans, terms and condition of the license/ allotment as well as registration of RERA, etc. Subject to the terms in this Agreement, the Promoter undertakes to strictly abide by such plans approved by the competent authorities and shall also strictly abide by the provisions and norms prescribed by the relevant State laws and shall not have an option to make any variation/ alteration/ modification in such plans, other than in the manner provided under the Act and Rules made thereunder or as per approvals/instructions/ guidelines of the competent authorities, and any breach of this term by the Promoter shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement.

  • Alignment with Modernization Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities The activities and services that the LPHA has agreed to deliver under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities and the public health accountability metrics (if applicable), as follows (see Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf):

  • Improvement Plan A written plan developed by the evaluator, utilized when a teacher received a Rating of Ineffective on his/her Evaluation or on any individual deficiency in the evaluation system.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.