Review of Existing Information. 1.2.1 Existing utility information, existing record drawings of previous projects, and existing survey information are readily available to the Engineer and the public. The Director shall provide access to such information. It is the responsibility of the Engineer to physically gather this information from available sources.
1.2.2 The Engineer shall review applicable existing information and develop independent recommendations based on the information.
Review of Existing Information. In preparation for the previous inspection task, XXX has searched the Commission’s Morrisville drawing files and existing documentation and reproduced the obtainable original plans. However, we will revisit the Commission’s achieves as a check to ensure we have all the available existing information. • Perform a site visit to refine concepts for new sign placements, M&PT, surveying and soil boring operations. • XXX will contact utility companies, identify utilities in the vicinity of each proposed sign foundation, indicate these utilities on the plans, submit verification plans to the utility companies and indicate on the plans any utility designed relocations. Utility relocations (performed by the utility company) will be coordinated with the project.
A. Task 3 – Plans, Specifications and Estimate
Review of Existing Information. In preparation for the previous inspection task, XXX has searched the Commission’s Yardley drawing files and existing documentation and reproduced the obtainable original plans. However, we will revisit the Commission’s achieves as a check to ensure we have all the available existing information. • Perform a site visit to refine concepts for new sign placements, M&PT, surveying and soil boring operations. • XXX will contact utility companies, identify utilities in the vicinity of each proposed sign foundation, indicate these utilities on the plans, submit verification plans to the utility companies and indicate on the plans any utility designed relocations. Utility relocations (performed by the utility company) will be coordinated with the project. • XXX will field verify the proposed signage improvements prior to completion of final design. A total of three (3) site visits are anticipated. • New roadway signs will be designed based on the recommended strategy and standards established by the M.U.T.C.D., PennDOT and the Commission. All roadway signing will be shown on the final design drawings. New signs will be designed using “GuidSign” software. • Roadside safety devices will be designed for the protection of sign structures and shown on the final drawings. • Perform detailed survey in vicinity of new sign structure foundations. • Perform required subsurface exploration including soil borings and foundation recommendations. • Perform sign structure and support designs in accordance with PennDOT standards. • Plans and details will be prepared for M&PT, including detours as required for the construction of the new signs and structures. As many as six (6) detours may be required. Final M&PT design drawings will be prepared to scale, and will show the work zones, lane widths, temporary signing, striping, temporary traffic control devices, and details. XXX will also develop the construction staging of the improvements. M&PT plans will be prepared for review and comment at the 60% and Pre-Final stages, prior to final submission to the Commission. • Construction details for traffic roadway signing and supports, roadside safety devices, temporary M&PT devices and temporary signing will be prepared. PennDOT or NJDOT details will be utilized where appropriate. • XXX will prepare quantity calculations for all proposed items of work. Based on the quantity estimate we will prepare a cost estimate for the fabrication and erection of the proposed and temporary items. •...
Review of Existing Information. Engineer will review and validate existing documentation and traffic information. Based on the analysis of existing data, Engineer will prepare a Project needs assessment and, in coordination with the Program Manager and the City of Mission staff, identify data/resource requirements. Existing information to include previous (limited) Feasibility Studies that examined Private Occupancy Vehicle (POV) and commercial truck traffic (sans rail projections) and will serve basis of vetted feasibility parameters which the Engineer must evaluate / incorporate as much as possible into ensuing scopes. Engineer must validate and either amend or update key assumptions. New information relevant to the Project will also be collected, including but not limited to traffic reports, the latest traffic volumes within the study area, historical and forecasted border crossing volumes of relevant international bridges, existing origin-destination (OD) surveys, and relevant socioeconomic data.
Review of Existing Information. Engineer will review and re-validate the information generated for the Presidential Permit Traffic Projections. Based on the analysis of existing data, Engineer will prepare a Project needs assessment and, in coordination with PROGRAM MANAGER and the City of Mission staff, identify data/resource requirements and develop a data collection program. New information relevant to the Project will also be collected, including but not limited to traffic reports, the latest traffic volumes, historical and forecasted border crossing volumes of relevant international bridges, existing origin-destination (OD) surveys, and relevant socioeconomic data regarding the study area.
Review of Existing Information. Review available as-built plans for the existing building and previous geotechnical exploration results around the proposed site to identify geologic conditions and probable subsurface features. Prior to the exploration, conduct a geological site reconnaissance. During the site reconnaissance, meet with plant staff and review locations of known facilities. Afterwards, xxxx and reference the exploration locations (borings) in the field, and then contact the utility notification center (One-Call) for utility clearance.
Review of Existing Information. As an initial task, the consulting team will review the existing background information (data and reports) related to the site and pertinent to the project. This review will include our 2015 and 2017 trail feasibility reports, existing GIS/Lidar data, historical aerial images, geologic mapping, drainage studies, and any other information/data made available by the client. Because we are already familiar with the project site as part of our 2015 and 2017 trail feasibility assessment, we do not anticipate this to be a time consuming task.
Review of Existing Information. The Consultant shall review all existing studies and background information and identify and analyse all significant motorway alignment options previously developed in terms of engineering, economic, social and environmental aspects and provide an assessment of their quality and suitability for use in identification of a preferred option and preliminary design. Studies and information to be reviewed include, but are not limited to: • Gap Analysis Report, dated June 2013, prepared on behalf of JASPERS; • Pre-feasibility Studies (Xxxxxx, 1996/1997); • Feasibility Studies (including Iptana and Sceauroute [EGIS], 2008); • Existing survey data (geotechnical, geological, seismic, meteorological, topographic, traffic and transport, archaeological); • Transport studies e.g. National Transport Master Plan; • CESTRIN datasets; • Environmental studies (including Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) /Appropriate Assessment (AA) study); • Planning and land use studies; • Public utilities studies; • Archaeological studies; The review carried out by the Consultant shall cover the existing Pre-Feasibility studies completed in 1994 and 1997 as well as the Feasibility Study completed in 2008 which had the following structure: Pre-Feasibility Studies completed in 1994 and 1997 werw structured as follows: Volume no. Description Sub-section Volume 2 Prefeasibility Study dated December 1994 Covers route options for the section Pitesti – Curtea de Arges - Cornetu Volume 3 Prefeasibility Study dated January 1997 Covers route options for the section Cornetu - Sibiu The Feasibility Study completed in 2008 was structured as follows: Volume no. Description Sub-section Presentation Report Route Alignment Assessment Covers route options for the entire scheme between Sibiu to Pitesti. Vol. 1 Synthesis Vol. 2.1 Road Works Section I Sibiu – Cornet ch 0+000 to ch 40+200 Section II Cornet – Tigveni ch 40+201 to ch 78+500 Section III Tigveni – Pitesti ch 78+500 – ch 116+640
Review of Existing Information. ENGINEER will obtain and review reports, data and other relevant information which may include but not necessarily be limited to: • Water Master Plan • WUP (Water Use Permit) • City water usage and water quality data • City water reuse data • City growth and development projections • Existing well logs and drilling records • CFWI (Central Florida Water Initiative) reports and materials • PRWC reports, documents, meeting minutes and correspondence • Published hydrogeologic information
Review of Existing Information. Our Project Manager will meet with District staff as appropriate to gather all existing studies and reports, discuss data needed for the EIR and deadlines by which the data would be needed, and to discuss schedule and deliverables. In addition, under this task, we will review all previous plans prepared for the two campuses. We will also develop and provide to the District a list of data needs and a detailed schedule for completion of the EIR.
