Participant selection process Sample Clauses

Participant selection process. The applications for the JERICO Malta Summer School were open from the 1st of February 2013 up to the 30th of April 2013. Interested applicants had to complete and send an official application, a letter of recommendation, a covering letter expressing their interest in the school as well as their curriculum vitae. A total of 83 applications were received. In the application form, prospective students indicated their past experience in similar courses, whether they had been awarded a scholarship before and the financial support requested from JERICO (for travel, accommodation and subsistence allowance) to attend this school. Nineteen of the received applications did not require any funding support so they were accepted without any adjudication. A dedicated Steering Committee was set up to evaluate the applications that required sponsorship. This board was made of the members shown in Table 1. All of the received documents were stored in folders according to 'county of residence' and shared with the members of the board for evaluation. Xxxxx were allocated according to the applicants’ qualifications, work experience in operational oceanography, their ability to increase the impact of JERICO and the level of support of the course to applicant's career. The marks from all members of the Board were collected and the average was determined. Points related to the person making the recommendation as well as the applicant's geographical location were added to the scores to get the final global mark for ranking. Sixteen participants (11 of whom required full sponsorship and five required partial sponsorship) were selected. Thirty-five applicants were chosen to participate in the JERICO Malta Summer School. Seventeen students were male and 18 were female. A modicum of equitability in terms of geographical representation was maintained. Attendees were from 17 different countries as follows: Belgium (1), Croatia (1), Finland (1), France (1), Germany (1), Ireland (1), Italy (9), Malta (2), Norway (1), Poland (2), Portugal (3), Romania (2), Slovenia (2), Spain (3), Tunis (1), UK (3), and Ukraine (1). The large number of participants from Italy was due to the fact that self-supported candidates (i.e. candidates who did not request financial support) were accepted without being considered in the evaluation exercise. Table 1: JERICO Summer School Steering Committee Name Affiliation Xxxxxxx Xxxxx IFREMER Xxxxx Xxxxx and Xx Xxxxx Cefas Xxxxx Xxxxx DELTARES Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Participant selection process

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Enrollment Process The Department may, at any time, revise the enrollment procedures. The Department will advise the Contractor of the anticipated changes in advance whenever possible. The Contractor shall have the opportunity to make comments and provide input on the changes. The Contractor will be bound by the changes in enrollment procedures.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Time Off for Selection Procedures A regular, limited-term or probationary employee shall be entitled to necessary time off with pay to participate in tests of fitness, examinations and interviews required by the Chief Human Resources Officer during working hours for the purpose of determining eligibility for movement to another class in the County service or transfer from one agency/department to another.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Shift Selection In multiple shift operations, employees within each classification shall have a right to select their work shift on the basis of their seniority within a bureau or division thereof and competing only with employees covered under this agreement on the following basis:

  • Election Procedures Each holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock (“Holder”) shall have the right, subject to the limitations set forth in this Article II, to submit an election in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.