Performance Tracking Sample Clauses

Performance Tracking. CHS, on behalf of DCE, will provide an approximation of performance tracking based on information and data received from Provider. Provider acknowledges that performance tracking will be assessed separately for the periods prior to [January 1, 202_], versus the period starting [January 1, 202_]. Due to the bifurcated tracking of performance tracking, Provider acknowledges that performance of Provider versus performance of all other providers in the DCE will be based on CHS’ best approximation.
Sample 1
Performance Tracking. The Parties will work together to develop the data and information necessary to improve health services and to monitor and report on health status and health care information for First Nations in B.C. Actions under consideration include, but are not limited to, establishing data sharing agreements and mechanisms for the timely sharing of data on the health of First Nations in B.C.; reporting every five years on the health status of Aboriginal people through the Office of the Provincial Health Officer, with interim reports every two years; and expanding health surveying to include First Nations.
Sample 1Sample 2
Performance Tracking. For the Performance Tracking section of the reporting form, each Project budgeted on this Agreement should be reported separately to reflect the current status. Project Tile: Identify each project title, (i.e. Xxxxx Haven Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Old Ferry Dock Boat Ramp, etc.)
Sample 1Sample 2
Performance Tracking. For the Performance Tracking section of the reporting form, each Project budgeted on this Agreement should be reported separately to reflect the current status. Start Date: This date should identify the actual start date of the project, if the project has not started list the projected start date. Projected End Date: List the anticipated end date of the project and/or actual end date of the project.
Sample 1
Performance Tracking. It is important to measure the Contractor's performance to ensure that the contract is in compliance with what has been requested. NPS expects that the contractor will not only fulfill the staffing services as stated in the RFP but will also provide monthly reports and detailed invoices that document services rendered. Human Resources Director or designee can submit complaints orally or in writing to the Project Manager. NPS may also submit complaints in writing to the Contractor for immediate resolution pertaining to any condition of compliance with contractual provisions. Immediate attention and resolution given to complaints and the number of complaints filed will be the criteria used for measuring performance.
Sample 1
Performance Tracking. The Borrower shall cause Fund IV Holdco to make themselves available during normal business hours at the reasonable request of the Administrative Agent (acting on the instructions of the Required Lenders) to discuss the basis for any calculations, including the interpretation and application of the calculation rules, conventions and procedures under the applicable Limited Liability Company Agreement. At any time during the occurrence of any Event of Default or a Distribution Trap, the Administrative Agent may submit the latest Tax Equity Opco Model for the Tax Equity Opco, together with the exhibits or supplemental information thereto, to a model auditor selected by the Administrative Agent for its review at the sole cost and expense of the Borrower.
Sample 1
Performance Tracking. Company will provide to PRISM Group, Inc. (“PRISM”), on a monthly basis commencing no later than six (6) months from the Effective Date hereof, in an electronic format ticket-level detailed transactional data. Such data will include, but not be limited to, the amount of Company Group’s total (by segment) worldwide on all Participating Airlines air ticket sales and segments and the amount of Company’s total (by segment) worldwide air ticket sales and segments produced for all airline travel by Company. The transfer of data to PRISM with respect to a month will be completed no later than the 15th day of the following month. PRISM will, in turn, provide the data, in processed form, to the Participating Airlines. The data transfer will continue during the term of this Agreement, including any extensions thereof. Pursuant to the foregoing, Company will cause its Authorized Ticketing Locations to provide such data to PRISM. In connection therewith and during the term hereof, Company will maintain an active data release authorization(s) (“DRA”) in place with such Authorized Ticketing Locations in the format specified by the Participating Airlines. 01-Nov-2019 Xxxx XxXxxx Director, Procurement & Supplier Diversity Service University of Virginia 0000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xx. Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Re: Commercial Offer Dear Xxxx XxXxxx, I am writing you on behalf of United Airlines, Inc. (the “Lead Carrier”), Air Canada, All Nippon Airways, Co., Ltd, Austrian Airlines Inc., Brussels Airlines SA/NV, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Eurowings GmbH (EW) and Swiss International Air Lines Limited (together with the Lead Carrier, the “Participating Airlines”). The undersigned has the authority to represent all the Participating Airlines in connection with this “Commercial Offer”. Subject to compliance with the United for Business - Academia Agreement between the Participating Airlines and University of Virginia (“Company”) effective 01-Nov-2019 (the “Agreement”), this Commercial Offer shall be effective from 01-Nov-2019 to 31-Oct-2022. Capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. This letter represents the Participating Airlines’ offer to provide Company with the Discounts outlined in the attached Exhibit A and with the Travel Values specified hereto, solely in conjunction with Qualifying Tickets issued for the use of Eligible Travellers; provided that Company, or its AOR, has furnished the necessary fare filing information re...
Sample 1

Related to Performance Tracking

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopted for the employees of the Employer; 5.2 The Employee accepts that the purpose of the performance management system will be to provide a comprehensive system with specific performance standards to assist the employees and service providers to perform to the standards required; 5.3 The Employer must consult the Employee about the specific performance standards and targets that will be included in the performance management system applicable to the Employee; 5.4 The Employee undertakes to actively focus on the promotion and implementation of the key performance indicators (including special projects relevant to the employee’s responsibilities) within the local government framework; 5.5 The criteria upon which the performance of the Employee shall be assessed shall consist of two components, Operational Performance and Competencies both of which shall be contained in the Performance Agreement; 5.6 The Employee’s assessment will be based on his performance in terms of the outputs/outcomes (performance indicators) identified as per attached Performance Plan, which are linked to the KPAs, and will constitute 80% of the overall assessment result as per the weightings agreed to between the Employer and Employee; 5.7 The Competencies will make up the other 20% of the Employee’s assessment score. The Competencies are spilt into two groups, leading competencies (indicated in blue on the graph below) that drive strategic intent and direction and core competencies (indicated in green on the graph below), which drive the execution of the leading competencies. Strategic direc on and leadership People management Program and project management Financial management Change leadership Governance leadersip Moral competence Planning and organising Analysis and innova on Knowledge and informa on management Communica on Results and quality focus

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Excused The Affected Party, to the extent rendered unable to perform its obligations or part thereof under this Agreement as a consequence of the Force Majeure Event shall be excused from performance of the obligations. Provided that, the excuse from performance shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is reasonably warranted by the Force Majeure Event. Provided further, nothing contained herein shall absolve the Affected Party from any payment obligations accrued prior to the occurrence of the underlying Force Majeure Event.

  • Performance Management 17.1 The Contractor will appoint a suitable Account Manager to liaise with the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager. Any/all changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be agreed in writing between the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor’s appointed representative. 17.2 The Contractor will ensure that there will be dedicated resources to enable the smooth running of the Framework Agreement and a clear plan of contacts at various levels within the Contractor's organisation. Framework Public Bodies may look to migrate to this Framework Agreement as and when their current contractual arrangements expire. The Contractor will where necessary assign additional personnel to this Framework Agreement to ensure agreed service levels are maintained and to ensure a consistent level of service is delivered to all Framework Public Bodies. 17.3 In addition to annual meetings with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager, the Contractor is expected to develop relationships with nominated individuals within each of the Framework Public Bodies to ensure that the level of service provided on a local basis is satisfactory. Where specific problems are identified locally, the Contractor will attempt to resolve such problems with the nominated individual within that organisation. The Authority's Strategic Contract Manager will liaise (or meet as appropriate) regularly with the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager, and where common problems are identified, it will be the responsibility of the Contractor to liaise with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to agree a satisfactory course of action. Where the Contractor becomes aware of a trend that would have a negative effect on one or more of the Framework Public Bodies, they should immediately notify the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to discuss corrective action. 17.4 Regular meetings, frequency to be advised by Framework Public Body, will be held between the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of their Call-Off Contract(s) under this Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Reports will be provided by the Contractor to the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager at least 14 days prior to the these meetings. 17.5 Performance review meetings will also be held annually, between the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of the Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators. A summary of the quarterly reports will be provided by the Contractor at least 14 days prior to these meetings. 17.6 The Authority will gather the outputs from contract management to review under the areas detailed in the table below. Provision of management reports 90% to be submitted within 10 working days of the month end Report any incident affecting the delivery of the Service(s) to the Framework Public Body 100% to be reported in writing to FPB within 24 hours of the incident being reported by telephone/email Prompt payment of sub-contractors and/or consortia members (if applicable). Maximum of 30 from receipt of payment from Framework Public Bodies, 10 days target 100% within 30 days

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out- 4.1.1 the performance objectives and targets that must be met by the Employee; and 4.1.2 the time frames within which those performance objectives and targets must be met. 4.2 The performance objectives and targets reflected in Annexure A are set by the Employer in consultation with the Employee and based on the Integrated Development Plan, Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) and the Budget of the Employer, and shall include key objectives; key performance indicators; target dates and weightings. 4.2.1 The key objectives describe the main tasks that need to be done. 4.2.2 The key performance indicators provide the details of the evidence that must be provided to show that a key objective has been achieved. 4.2.3 The target dates describe the timeframe in which the work must be achieved. 4.2.4 The weightings show the relative importance of the key objectives to each other. 4.3 The Employee’s performance will, in addition, be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in