Preliminary Review Sample Clauses

Preliminary Review. Prior to issuing a disciplinary action of unpaid suspension, demotion, or discharge, the supervisor will make a recommendation to his/her supervisor regarding proposed discipline. That supervisor will then schedule a meeting with the employee prior to making a final determination of the proposed discipline. The employee shall have the opportunity to have union representation present and be provided the opportunity to speak on his/her behalf regarding the proposed action. If the employee is unable to meet with the supervisor, the employee will be given the opportunity to respond in writing.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Preliminary Review. Within five business days of receipt of the request from the Director, the Plan will complete a preliminary review of your request to determine whether: • You were a covered person at the time health care service was re­ quested or provided; • The service that is the subject of the Adverse Determination or the Fi­ nal Adverse Determination is a Covered Service under this benefit program, but the Plan has determined that the health care service is not covered; • You have exhausted the Plan's internal appeal process, unless you are not required to exhaust the Plan's internal appeal process pursuant to the Illinois Health Carrier External Review Act; and • You have provided all the information and forms required to process an external review. For appeals relating to a determination based on treatment being experi­ mental or investigational, the Plan will complete a preliminary review to determine whether the requested service or treatment that is the subject of the Adverse Determination or Final Adverse Determination is a Covered Service, except for the Plan's determination that the service or treatment is experimental or investigational for a particular medical condition and is not explicitly listed as an excluded benefit. In addition, your health care provider has certified that one of the following situations is applicable: • Standard health care services or treatments have not been effective in improving your condition; • Standard health care services or treatments are not medically ap­ propriate for you; or • There is no available standard health care services or treatment cov­ ered by the Plan that is more beneficial than the recommended or requested service or treatment. • In addition, a) your health care provider has certified in writing that the health care service or treatment is likely to be more beneficial to you, in the opinion of your health care provider, than any available standard health care services or treatments; or b) your health care provider, who is a licensed, board certified or board eligible physician qualified to practice in the area of medicine appropriate to treat your condition has certified in writing that scientifically valid studies using accepted pro­ tocols demonstrate that the health care service or treatment requested is likely to be more beneficial to you than any available standard health care services or treatments.
Preliminary Review. The Plan Administrator will perform a preliminary review of the domestic relations order to determine if it is a QDRO. If this preliminary review indicates the order is deficient in some manner, the Plan Administrator will allow the parties to attempt to correct any deficiency before issuing a final decision on the domestic relations order. The ability to correct is limited to a reasonable period of time.
Preliminary Review. For this paragraph’s purposes only, “Publication” does not mean a disclosure that reasonably has excluded detailed experimental results.
Preliminary Review. Preliminary review of the proposed development and preliminary layout of the required water main extension in accordance with the District’s Water Comprehensive Plan and other related policies.
Preliminary Review. The Plan must complete a preliminary review within 5 business days from receipt of the Member’s request for a standard external review to determine whether:
Preliminary Review. When a report or formal complaint alleging possible misconduct in research and scholarly activities is received by the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement, he or she will appoint a designee(s) to conduct a PRELIMINARY REVIEW. Normally the designee will be the Xxxx of the relevant college, but in situations of real, apparent, or potential conflict of interest, some other appropriate person(s) of comparable rank without any such conflict shall be appointed. The designee will conduct a PRELIMINARY REVIEW of the information or circumstances giving rise to a suspicion of misconduct in research and scholarly activities. The designee is directed to inform the person(s) alleged to have committed the act(s) of misconduct (the respondent) and, if the respondent(s) so desire, receive account(s) of the situation under inquiry from their/his/her point of view. The designee may consult informally, on a confidential basis, with the chairperson of the department involved and with others in the university community in carrying out the PRELIMINARY REVIEW. Immediate action should be taken to protect any data or other materials involved, including obtaining secure possession of such materials. The purpose of the PRELIMINARY REVIEW is to ascertain whether or not there is sufficient substance to the allegation of misconduct to proceed with additional investigation. The PRELIMINARY REVIEW should be completed by the designee within seven days of the receipt of the allegation or other information. Any need for additional time must be documented in writing. The designee shall make a written recommendation to the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement with copies to the respondent, and to any complainant. The recommendation shall specify either that the allegation or other information is without substance and the matter should be closed or that there is sufficient substance to the claims of misconduct to warrant further review. The respondent(s) may comment in writing on the written recommendation, which comment will be attached and subsequently included thereafter with the written recommendation. The Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement shall review the recommendation of the PRELIMINARY REVIEW designee and decide whether to proceed to the next level of review. If the decision is consistent with the PRELIMINARY REVIEW recommendation and is to proceed, the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement shall bring the matter before the University Research and Scholar...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Preliminary Review. (see 6.7(a)(1))
Preliminary Review. (see Section 6.7(a)(1)).
Preliminary Review. A preliminary review occurs prior to Pre-consultation. Its purpose is to gather information and is typically part of a developer’s due diligence. Preliminary discussions about a potential development application benefit the applicant by supplying early information about the land, process and possible issues. An important part of a preliminary review is providing direction on the Pre-Consultation Process. In particular, the applicant needs to understand what information is required by the parties prior to pre-consultation and any fees.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!