Program performance indicator tracking table Sample Clauses

Program performance indicator tracking table. FHI fully complied with the monitoring and evaluation activities that it set out to do according to its monitoring and evaluation plan (FHI 1999b). A mid-term evaluation was conducted in April-June 2001 (FHI 2001b). The annual reports always included a detailed indicator performance tracking table which contained all the indicator information that was associated with planned activities for that year. In some cases, where program activities were modified as a result of new advances or other factors, this was also reported on and the absence of performance indicators values was justified. Table Two on the next page summarizes the program’s performance for the period FY1999 to FY2002. With one year of the program still to be completed, thirty eight of the forty two output/activity targets that the FHI ISA set out to achieve, were fully met or exceeded. The four targets that were not met were: • Educational methods and messages post-test score (70% instead of 80%) • Number of staff trained on how to adequately prepare for an emergency (9 instead of 10) • Number of staff trained in designing and implementing an emergency program (9 instead of 10) • Average post test score for emergency transition workshop participants (65% instead of 80%) In the case of educational messages most fields were close to the target, but Mozambique’s score of 58% was very low. Several reasons for the lower-than- planned post-test scores in the educational messages workshops were given (FHI 2000:4): 1) The workshops covered a lot of topics and adding a day or two may have helped the staff to fully absorb the material; 2) One of the test questions was answered incorrectly by almost all the participants, which is generally a sign that the question was poorly worded. Without that question test scores would have been close to or greater than 80% for three of the four fields in question; 3) In the case of Mozambique (post test –score 58% vs. 80% planned), the workshop was conducted by second-generation trainers as the original workshop was postponed due to the flooding in the program area in February 2000. In the case of lower than planned test scores for the workshop on transitioning from emergencies into development, one of the main reasons may again be that a lot of materials were covered within a very short time period. It is also important to note that average pre-test scores increased from a low 31% to 65%. Thus staff, who attended the workshop, probably started from a much lower kno...