PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION Sample Clauses

PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION. 4.1 The Recipient must provide Manitoba with all reports for the projects in accordance with Schedule “A”. 4.2 The Recipient must develop an evaluation cycle wherein all project components are consistently evaluated.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION. Documentation to the County will include itemized hours of work performed that month, year to hours, and total budgeted hours broken out for each program. A narrative summary of work plan progress will also be provided monthly. The narrative summary and any back up documentation will include the information listed under each program work plan; to the County will include.” Receipts for reimbursable material expenses will be provided. This is for expenses such as education display materials, publicity posters, resource and information brochures, postage, news ads, newspaper insert costs, printing, etc. Ecology Action will submit, with its June invoice, a year-end Work Plan summary which identifies the completion date or work progress status of each work task contained within this Work Plan. Each project area will be evaluated using the following methods: Periodic review by advisory board for each individual project area. Written plan to County staff on how the work plan should be refined for the following fiscal year. Hours by task detail shown on accompanying table. Hours for each work task are exceed and may be re-allocated among work tasks only with approval of County. ** Expense by task detail shown on accompanying table. The reimbursable expense budget is a amount based on the attached schedule; each expenditure is contingent on approval by County staff. Any transfer of unspent budget amounts among reimbursable expenses or from reimbursable expenses to labor hours requires written approval of County. Except for the Waste Away - Business Waste Reduction brochure, all print and electronic promotional material prepared for work plan tasks, including text and artwork shall become property of the County upon completion. Copies, including electronic files, shall be made 02 83 available to County. ESTIMATED CONSULTANT STAFF HOURS: 2,580 STAFF COST HOUR $121,260 TOTAL BUDGET FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $ 9,000 TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $130,260 Ecology Action BUDGET FY 02-03 Public Awareness and Education Solid Waste Reduction and Diversion STAFF HOUR BUDGET: Business Waste Reduction Program 02-03 hours A. Waste Audit Services 260 Materials Exchange 250 C. Packaging Ordinance 160 D. School Recycling Services 520 Subtotal Budget for BWR Program 1190 Home Waste Diversion Program A. General Promotion B. Home Composting Workshops 210
Sample 1
PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION a. Progress Reports: One- to two-page or as otherwise specified by Program Staff reports summarizing progress toward milestones will be submitted to Internews in accordance with 4.01 “Table of Milestones, Deliverables, and Payment.” b. Final Report: A final report will be submitted to Internews in accordance with 4.01 “Table of Milestones, Deliverables, and Payment” and will include an evaluation of the impact of this project. In particular, the evaluation should address the ways in which project goals have been met. OR as otherwise specified by Program Staff
Sample 1Sample 2
PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION. Documentation to the County will include itemized hours of work performed that month, year to date hours, and total budgeted hours broken out for each program. A narrative summary of work plan progress will also be provided monthly. The narrative summary and any back up documentation will include the information listed under each program work plan; “Documentation to the County will include.” Receipts for reimbursable material expenses will be provided. This is for expenses such as education display materials, publicity posters, resource and information brochures, postage, news ads, newspaper insert costs, printing, etc.
Sample 1Sample 2
PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION. The Recipient will provide the following reports to USAID Agreement Officer’s Representative (AOR) and the Agreement Officer (AO) as specified below, in accordance with 22 CFR 226.51 and 226.52 and the Substantial Involvement Provisions.
Sample 1
PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION. (a.) Start-up Work Plan: Within 15 days after award, the Award Recipient will submit a Start-up Work Plan for approval by the USAID Agreement Officer’s Representative (AOR). This plan should describe preparations for priority program activities and provide a schedule for mobilizing and staffing the project during the first three months after award.
Sample 1

Related to PROGRAM REPORTING AND EVALUATION

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Reporting and Monitoring Please provide a brief description of the mechanisms proposed for this project for reporting to the UNDP and partners, including a reporting schedule.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Reporting and Record Keeping CONTRACTOR shall comply with all program and fiscal reporting requirements set forth by appropriate Federal, State and local agencies, and as required by the COUNTY. (c) CONTRACTOR agrees to provide to COUNTY, to any Federal or State department having monitoring or review authority, to COUNTY's authorized representatives, and/or their appropriate audit agencies upon reasonable notice, access to and the right to examine all records and documents necessary to determine compliance with relevant Federal, State, and local statutes, rules and regulations, and this Agreement, and to evaluate the quality, appropriateness and timeliness of services performed.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING Performance indicators

  • Management Reporting (a) Provide periodic reports, in accordance with agreed upon frequency and content parameters, to the Funds. As reasonably requested by the Funds, the Transfer Agent shall furnish ad hoc reports to the Funds.