Project Performance Monitoring Sample Clauses

Project Performance Monitoring. The Contractor shall:- Monitor the quality of the service provision to ensure customer satisfaction in accordance with the Solutions team as outlined in the Contract, unless otherwise approved by the Project Manager/Authorised Officer. Provide a report on progress to the Project Manager/Authorised Officer on a regular basis, on a quarterly basis. Attend meetings on site to review progress and discuss the service, as required by the Project Manager/Authorised Officer.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project Performance Monitoring. APG shall, and shall cause APDOT and IAs to ensure, that (i) Project impact is monitored and evaluated through a Project performance monitoring system, as agreed to by APDOT and ADB, to ensure that Project facilities are managed efficiently, benefits are maximized, and social impacts are monitored, including data disaggregated by gender, wherever possible; (ii) necessary information and data on Project performance is collected before Project implementation, at completion of the Project, and three (3) years thereafter; and (iii) reports summarizing the key findings of monitoring are submitted to ADB.
Sample 1
Project Performance Monitoring. Provisions reflecting final PCG documentation to be inserted. [The Commercial Banks will provide ADB with quarterly reports including that for disbursement and compliance with ADB policies and guarantee and loan covenants. These reports will provide information necessary to update ADB's project performance reporting system.]
Sample 1
Project Performance Monitoring. All projects implemented throughout ICAP received some measure of monitoring. Those projects prior to the creation of a dedicated M&E department were supervised by an ACDI/VOCA engineer in order to verify delivery of outputs. With the commencement of formalized monitoring and evaluation in mid 2004, regular monitoring and evaluation visits were conducted to assess project performance on a more systematic basis, and also to assess projects post-implementation to verify the activities of the CAG and the impact of the projects on the beneficiaries on a qualitative basis. The following table illustrates the numbers of evaluation visits conducted throughout ICAP. CAP 1 CAP 2 CAP 3 Total Overall total Regular projects Number of projects evaluated 000 000 000 386 703 % of total projects that year 33.6% 70% 61.7% 50.1% Xxxxx projects Number of evaluated projects n/a 164 153 317 634 % of total projects that year n/a 57.7% 41.0% 48.2% 1337
Sample 1
Project Performance Monitoring. The Borrower shall cause the Project Executing Agency to monitor and evaluate the Project outcomes and outputs against the indicators provided in the Project’s design and monitoring framework, as well as in the detailed Project performance and benefits monitoring framework, prepared under the Project-preparatory ADB-administered technical assistance. The Borrower shall ensure that the Project Executing Agency (i) collects the necessary information and data, including gender-disaggregated information for relevant indicators, on Project performance before Project implementation, at completion, and on the third anniversary of Project completion; and (ii) submits to ADB the reports summarizing the key findings of this monitoring.
Sample 1
Project Performance Monitoring. The Borrower shall cause the MRT to monitor and evaluate the Project outcomes and outputs against the indicators provided in the Project’s design and monitoring framework. The Borrower shall ensure that the MRT (i) collects the necessary information and data, including gender-disaggregated information for relevant indicators, on Project performance before Project implementation, at completion, and on the third anniversary of Project completion; and (ii) submits to ADB the reports summarizing the key findings of this monitoring.
Sample 1
Project Performance Monitoring. The Recipient shall ensure that the implementation of the Project, the benefits resulting from the Project, and the overall operations of the Project facilities are monitored and evaluated bi-annually. Within six (6) months of the Effective Date, the Recipient shall further refine the Project performance monitoring system, in a manner satisfactory to ADB, including the use of relevant financial and technical monitoring indicators and information.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project Performance Monitoring. System (PPMS) 32. Within three (3) months of the Effective Date, the PCC shall have established a PPMS. Within nine (9) months of the Effective Date, the PCC shall have submitted baseline physical and socioeconomic data as well as a detailed implementation plan for monitoring performance to ADB for its review and concurrence. Where appropriate, data shall be disaggregated by gender. Thereafter, the PCC shall coordinate with the ROs to submit semiannual monitoring and evaluation reports to ADB.
Sample 1

Related to Project Performance Monitoring

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Performance Management 17.1 The Contractor will appoint a suitable Account Manager to liaise with the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager. Any/all changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be agreed in writing between the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor’s appointed representative. 17.2 The Contractor will ensure that there will be dedicated resources to enable the smooth running of the Framework Agreement and a clear plan of contacts at various levels within the Contractor's organisation. Framework Public Bodies may look to migrate to this Framework Agreement as and when their current contractual arrangements expire. The Contractor will where necessary assign additional personnel to this Framework Agreement to ensure agreed service levels are maintained and to ensure a consistent level of service is delivered to all Framework Public Bodies. 17.3 In addition to annual meetings with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager, the Contractor is expected to develop relationships with nominated individuals within each of the Framework Public Bodies to ensure that the level of service provided on a local basis is satisfactory. Where specific problems are identified locally, the Contractor will attempt to resolve such problems with the nominated individual within that organisation. The Authority's Strategic Contract Manager will liaise (or meet as appropriate) regularly with the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager, and where common problems are identified, it will be the responsibility of the Contractor to liaise with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to agree a satisfactory course of action. Where the Contractor becomes aware of a trend that would have a negative effect on one or more of the Framework Public Bodies, they should immediately notify the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to discuss corrective action. 17.4 Regular meetings, frequency to be advised by Framework Public Body, will be held between the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of their Call-Off Contract(s) under this Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Reports will be provided by the Contractor to the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager at least 14 days prior to the these meetings. 17.5 Performance review meetings will also be held annually, between the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of the Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators. A summary of the quarterly reports will be provided by the Contractor at least 14 days prior to these meetings. 17.6 The Authority will gather the outputs from contract management to review under the areas detailed in the table below. Provision of management reports 90% to be submitted within 10 working days of the month end Report any incident affecting the delivery of the Service(s) to the Framework Public Body 100% to be reported in writing to FPB within 24 hours of the incident being reported by telephone/email Prompt payment of sub-contractors and/or consortia members (if applicable). Maximum of 30 from receipt of payment from Framework Public Bodies, 10 days target 100% within 30 days

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 The intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.12 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI, and the score of the employer will be given to and explained to the Employee during the assessment interview. 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Continuing Performance (a) The obligations under this Agreement continue until satisfied in full and do not merge with any action performed or document executed by any Party for the purposes of performance of this Agreement. (b) Any representation in this Agreement survives the execution of any document for the purposes of, and continues after, performance of this Agreement. (c) Any indemnity given by any Party under this Agreement: (i) constitutes a liability of that Party separate and independent from any other liability of that Party under this Agreement or any other agreement; and (ii) survives and continues after performance of this Agreement.

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions: (1) a requirement that the HSP develop and implement an improvement plan that is acceptable to the LHIN; (2) the conduct of a Review; (3) a revision and amendment of the HSP’s obligations; and (4) an in-year, or year end, adjustment to the Funding, among other possible means of responding to the Performance Factor or improving performance. (b) Any performance improvement process begun under a prior service accountability agreement that was not completed under the prior agreement will continue under this Agreement. Any performance improvement required by a LHIN under a prior service accountability agreement will be deemed to be a requirement of this Agreement until fulfilled or waived by the LHIN.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!