Property Evaluation Sample Clauses

Property Evaluation a. The City Parties shall be permitted to enter upon the Property upon at least twenty- four (24) hours advance written notice to Owner at any time on or before April, 2023 (the “Termination Date”) solely for the purpose of the City Parties conducting its investigative work for the extension of a walking path to the south of 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx in the City, including a survey, wetland delineation and “Diggers Hotline” survey (collectively, the “City’s Work”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, under no circumstances may the City Parties enter into or upon any improvements or structures located on the Property or conduct any testing or obtain any soil borings. The City’s Work and access to the Property shall be subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth below and the City Parties’ conduct thereof shall be in strict compliance with its covenants and agreements contained herein. b. In conducting the City’s Work, the City Parties shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, ordinances. c. Owner shall have the right, but not the obligation, to have its representative(s) present during the City’s Work at the Property. d. All of the City’s Work pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be done at the City’s sole cost and expense. e. The City shall maintain comprehensive and general liability insurance covering the City Parties entrance upon the Property, in commercially reasonable form and amount, which shall name Owner as an additional insured.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Property Evaluation. Broker shall make routine interior and/or exterior evaluations of Property upon renewal of Property lease agreements, vacation of premises, or substitution of roommates, up to four inspections included per calendar year. Owner agrees to pay Broker Forty-five Dollars ($45.00) for any additional evaluation performed at the request of or as authorized by Owner. First evaluation will be completed at no cost. An evaluation shall not be interpreted as an "Inspection" as outlined in NRS 645D. An evaluation is designed to make Owner aware of obvious physical defects of Property, which are generally referred to as "cosmetic" in nature. Broker will not observe inaccessible areas of Property or seek-out hidden defects. Should Broker become aware of what could be a structural or systems problem, Owner will be notified in writing, and a licensed repair professional will be contacted at Owner's request.
Property Evaluation. Purchaser shall have the right during the Due Diligence Period to inspect and examine the Properties during regular business hours, to the extent Purchaser deems necessary, in their sole discretion, to determine the condition of the Properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any entry by the Purchaser into a leased space shall be coordinated with Sellers who shall then coordinate the time of Purchaser’s entry with the tenant occupying said leased space. Purchaser and Purchaser’s representatives, consultants, agents and employees shall during regular business hours: (a) have the right to perform inspections and have access to all buildings, improvements, storage areas (not under the control of tenants) and, subject to tenant rights, other spaces, equipment and personalty that are included in the Properties; and (b) conduct all other necessary feasibility studies, title reports, surveys, engineering studies, examination of zoning status, building and use permits, sign permits and all other permits required for the Properties. While conducting such investigations, tests and studies, Purchaser shall not unreasonably disturb or interfere with Sellers’ use of the Properties, or with Sellers’ tenants or employees.
Property Evaluation. The Parties intend to conduct such due diligence as may be reasonably required to evaluate the properties to be exchanged hereunder. This due diligence period shall commence on the Effective Date and expire thirty (30) days thereafter (the "Due Diligence Period"). Each Party will reasonably cooperate with the other to resolve any matters arising during the Due Diligence Period. TEMPE will cooperate with ASU to facilitate ASU's obtaining, at ASU's cost, a title insurance policy for ASU's acquisition of Lot 1. To the extent any title exceptions appear on any title report obtained by ASU that can be removed with the assistance of TEMPE, but at no cost to TEMPE, TEMPE will cooperate with ASU to cause such title exceptions to be removed.
Property Evaluation. The Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, cause (a) to be completed within 90 days of the date hereof a property exam by a third party acceptable to the Agent in its sole discretion to evaluate each Property, the Construction Budget for each Property and such other matters as the Financing Parties may request and (b) within 120 days of the date hereof such third party to deliver to each Financing Party a report in form, substance and detail acceptable to the Agent.
Property Evaluation. Acquiror shall have the right to inspect and examine the Property, during regular business hours, to the extent Acquiror deems necessary in its sole discretion, to determine the condition of the Property. Acquiror and Acquiror’s representatives, consultants, agents and employees shall, during regular business hours and upon no less than 24 hours prior notice to Contributor, who shall be entitled to accompany Acquiror during all inspections, (a) have the right to cause complete environmental reviews and site assessments and inspections of the Property to be made including only a customary Phase I environmental report, (b) have access to all buildings, improvements, storage areas (not under the control of tenants) and, subject to tenant rights, other spaces, equipment and personalty that are included in the Property, and (c) conduct all other necessary feasibility studies, title reports, surveys, soils tests, ground water tests, engineering studies, examination of zoning status, building and use permits, sign permits and all other permits required for the Property. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, Acquiror shall not conduct any invasive testing, or so-called Phase II Study, of the Property without first obtaining Contributor’s prior written consent which may be withheld in his sole discretion. While conducting such investigations, tests and studies, Acquiror shall not unreasonably disturb or interfere with Contributor’s business, tenants or employees or with access to or from the Property.
Property Evaluation. Purchaser shall have the right to perform any non-invasive inspections and examinations of the Property, at reasonable times and during regular business hours, to the extent Purchaser deems necessary, to determine the condition of the Property. Purchaser and Purchaser’s representatives, consultants, agents and employees shall, during regular business hours, (a) have the right to cause non-invasive environmental reviews and site assessments and inspections of the Property to be made, (b) have access to all buildings, improvements, storage areas (not under the control of tenants) and, subject to tenant rights, other spaces, equipment and personalty that are included in the Property, and (c) conduct all other necessary non-invasive feasibility studies, title reports, surveys, soils tests, engineering studies, examination of zoning status, building and use permits, sign permits and all other permits required for the Property. While conducting such investigations, tests and studies, Purchaser shall not unreasonably disturb or interfere with Seller’s use of the Property or any person using, occupying or providing services at the Property, including, without limitation, Seller’s tenants and employees. All of the inspections and examinations of the Property shall be at the sole cost and expense of Purchaser. Purchaser shall not cause any damage to the Property and, in the event of any damage to the Property, Purchaser shall immediately repair the same and return the Property to the condition immediately prior to such damage. Prior to entering onto the Property, Purchaser’s consultants and contractors will deliver to Seller certificates of commercial general liability insurance, naming Seller and GECC (as defined in Section 9A) as additional insured parties and will maintain such insurance during the Infection Period, in an amount of no less than $3,000,000 per occurrence insuring all activity and conduct of any employee or agent of Purchaser’s consultants or contractors while exercising the right of access hereunder.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Property Evaluation 

Related to Property Evaluation

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!