QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT Sample Clauses

QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT. Exhibit B-1, p. 5; Clean Energy Act, Section 2(l); Order G-278-19, Appendix A, p. 11 On page 5 of the Filing, BC Hydro states that: In February 2016, the Xxxxxx North project was acquired by CCPLP, which is comprised of Cayoose Creek Development Corporation and Innergex. The Sekw’el’was Cayoose Creek Indian Band (Cayoose Creek Indian Band) is the sole beneficial shareholder of Cayoose Creek Development Corporation [(CDCC)]. Cayoose Creek Indian Band is part of the St’at’imc Nation. The original Xxxxxx North EPA, Forbearance Agreement and Diversion Agreement were assigned to CCPLP at that time. Section (2)(l) of the Clean Energy Act (CEA) states that one of BC’s energy objectives is “to xxxxxx the development of first nation and rural communities through the use and development of clean or renewable resources”. On page 11 of the Reasons for Decision, attached as Appendix A to Order G-278-19, the BCUC references a previously proposed EPA renewal with the Xxxxxx North independent power producer (IPP) and states that: The Limited Partnership Agreement between CCDC and Innergex provides the CCIB and the TA with a number of benefits related to contracting, jobs and training,49 as well as a share of net income or loss earned by the CCPLP over the term of the 40-year EPA renewal.50 Salmon migration is facilitated by the Cayoosh Diversion Tunnel, and the Xxxxxx North IPP states that the salmon population “…is of great natural importance to the CCIB.” Several elements of the Xxxxxx North IPP operations provide specific protection and enhancement of the salmon population native to the Cayoosh and Seton areas, and the salmon and other fish species are a source of food for the local and downstream communities. Additionally, the IPP provides indirect employment for many members of the CCIB, as well as other indigenous and neighbouring communities.51
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT. A Professional Engineer of the firm shall visit the intersection/interchange under study during the morning and evening peak traffic periods, as determined from the 24-hour traffic counts. This will also include any period during which a problem was indicated by the work order. The Engineer shall make qualitative assessments of intersection operation, particularly in terms of queue lengths, delays, phasing, conflicts or any operational characteristics that should be considered in recommending the need for a traffic signal or other operational improvements. The CONSULTANT shall conduct a field inventory of each intersection under study and prepare a condition diagram on standard DEPARTMENT forms contained in the MUTS or in another format approved by the DEPARTMENT. The condition diagram shall show the intersection geometry and dimensions, including but not limited to, auxiliary turn lane lengths, lane widths, taper lengths, and turning and curb radii. The condition diagram shall show all traffic control devices and other roadway or roadside elements that contribute to the quality of intersection operation, including but not limited to driveways, sidewalks, signs, pavement markings, drainage inlets, buildings, utilities, signal poles, lighting, and other fixed objects. The condition diagram shall be a scaled drawing. If an aerial is used, it must be scaled and any features not readily apparent from the aerial shall be outlined. Any variations in current geometry from the aerial shall also be outlined. Aerials used in diagrams shall be included in the electronic file submittal. Color photographs shall be taken of each approach. The photographs shall show the lane configuration, STOP sign/bar location and condition, traffic signals and other special beacons or devices used to control traffic. The photographs shall be taken facing the approaching traffic. A minimum of 1 photograph shall be taken of each approach. Additional photographs shall be taken if needed to show the physical conditions. Photographs shall be taken of any geometric, traffic, or traffic control aspects about which the DTOE should be aware. The CONSULTANT shall recommend to the DTOE or PM if any supplemental work tasks are needed prior to commencing work on such tasks. • Assessment of intersection operation • Condition Diagram • Color photographs of intersections The CONSULTANT shall collect hourly traffic count data on each approach (up to 4 approaches) of the intersection for a minimum peri...
Sample 1
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT. Following the completion of the quantitative assessment, BRG’s Subject Matter Experts will interview key stakeholders at the hospital department level to develop an understanding of operational processes, challenges, and changes needed to achieve the improved performance levels. Our team combines the acquired departmental knowledge, specific understanding of hospital departments, and the results of the quantitative analysis to identify realistic and achievable cost containment opportunities. This approach provides a rich and concrete set of actionable initiatives that, when implemented, will result in measurable performance improvement.
Sample 1
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT. Review crash history to determine if a pattern(s) exist. Conduct an engineering field review to identify potentially correctable/hazardous conditions. Verify existing conditions. • Recommendations are either short-term or “ideas” that may require additional study and vetting. May lead to more study. • Considered high level.
Sample 1

Related to QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 During the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will also be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.13 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met (qualitative and quantitative) and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI; 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale described in 6.9 below shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Environmental Assessment Buyer shall have the right for a period commencing upon execution of this Agreement by both parties and ending on November 28, 2012, to conduct an environmental assessment of the Assets, at Buyer’s sole risk, liability and expense. Seller shall make available to Buyer, during the environmental assessment period described above, Seller’s historical files regarding prior operations on the Assets, and provide Buyer and its representatives with reasonable access to the Assets to conduct the environmental assessment. Buyer shall provide Seller three (3) days prior written notice of a desired date(s) for such assessment and Seller shall have the right to be present during any assessment and, if any testing is conducted pursuant to Seller’s express prior written consent, Seller may require splitting of all samples. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Buyer shall not have the right to drill any test, monitor or other xxxxx or to extract samples of any air, soil, water or other substance from the Assets without Seller’s express prior written consent. If Buyer proposes a reasonable request to drill a test well or extract a sample pursuant to a systematic and customary procedure for the assessment of the environmental condition of the Assets and Seller refuses to grant its consent to such a well or sampling, then Buyer shall have the right, for a period of seventy-two (72) hours following notification of Seller’s refusal to consent, to deliver written notice to Seller of Buyer’s election to exclude from this transaction the portion of the Assets affected by such proposed test well or sample, and the Purchase Price shall be adjusted accordingly by the Allocated Value of such portion of the Assets so excluded. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall Seller ever be obligated to grant its consent to any such test xxxxx or sampling proposed by Buyer, and Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for any refusal by Seller to grant its consent shall be the limited right contained in the preceding sentence to exclude the affected Assets from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. If Buyer fails to exercise the right to exclude such Assets by written notice to Seller delivered prior to the expiration of the seventy-two hour period described above, then Buyer shall be conclusively deemed to have waived such right and shall be obligated to purchase the affected Assets without conducting such testing or sampling or any adjustment of the Purchase Price unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment If, pursuant to Data Protection Law, Customer (or its Controllers) are required to perform a data protection impact assessment or prior consultation with a regulator, at Customer’s request, SAP will provide such documents as are generally available for the Cloud Service (for example, this DPA, the Agreement, audit reports or certifications). Any additional assistance shall be mutually agreed between the Parties.

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - DST shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats Schedule 10.2 p.2 occurring and the impact of those threats upon DST organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”). b. Risk Mitigation - DST shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Fund Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Fund Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of DST pursuant to the Agreement. c. Security Controls Testing - DST shall, on approximately an annual basis, engage an independent external party to conduct a review (including information security) of DST’s systems that are related to the provision of services. DST shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!