Reason for Recommendation. If a building principal or designated supervisor of a full-time probationary or tenure Employee recommends that such Employee not be continued in employment, he or the Employer shall provide such Employee with a written statement specifying the reason for the recommendation. An Employee may prepare a written response to such written statement and have it attached to the statement.
Reason for Recommendation. 4.1 To seek Member endorsement to the next stage of work, following the Council decision to create a Care Trust for Adult Services in Torbay
Reason for Recommendation. It is considered that the variation indicated above would still ensure that whatever improvements are to be obtained, by the expenditure by the Councils of the monies obtained, will be likely to be in place by the time a significant number of the dwellings are occupied. The variation will increase the likelihood that this xxxxxxxxxx site is redeveloped, by improving the deliverability of the scheme, and the residential development that takes place will have a beneficial effect on the supply of housing in the locality. There is also the possibility that the improved viability of the scheme arising from the phasing of these payments could eventually be reflected in an enhanced profit which may, because of the terms of the original agreement, lead to the provision of a contribution towards affordable housing provision Policies and Proposals in the approved Development Plan relevant to this decision:- Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent Core Spatial Strategy 2006-2026 (adopted 2009) (CSS) Policy CSP5 Open Space/ Sport/Recreation Policy CSP10 Planning Obligations Newcastle-under-Lyme Local Plan 2011 (NLP) Policy C4 Open Space in New Housing Areas Policy IM1 Provision of essential supporting infrastructure and community facilities Other material considerations include: National Planning Policy Framework (March 2012) Planning Practice Guidance (March 2014) CIL Regulations, particularly Section 122 Supplementary Planning Guidance Developer Contributions SPD (September 2007) North Staffordshire Green Space Strategy – adopted December 2009
Reason for Recommendation. It is accepted, following the obtaining of independent financial advice, that a policy compliant scheme is not viable and that the scheme can only sustain reduced contributions. It is accepted that the benefits of the development are considered to outweigh the harm caused by the additional demand created by the development on education places and public open space in the area. A Section 106 agreement is required to secure those policy compliant contributions which can be afforded and a viability review mechanism should substantial commencement not be achieved promptly, along with the amendments to the red edge development site.
Reason for Recommendation. 7.1 The East Suffolk Communities Team have reviewed the EqIA process by scoping and sourcing information relating to the current priorities and needs of the local citizens and communities and trying to anticipate (or future proof) future demands and needs.
Reason for Recommendation. It is considered that the variation indicated above would still ensure that whatever improvements are to be obtained, by the expenditure by the Council of the monies obtained, will be likely to be in place by the time any significant number of the dwellings are occupied. Policies and Proposals in the approved Development Plan relevant to this decision:- Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan 1996 – 2011 (SSSP) Policy D8: Providing Infrastructure Services, Facilities and /or Mitigation Measures associated with development Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent Core Spatial Strategy 2006-2026 (adopted 2009) (CSS) Policy CSP5 Open Space/ Sport/Recreation Policy CSP10 Planning Obligations Newcastle under Lyme Local Plan 2011 (LP) Policy C4 Open Space in New Housing Areas Policy IM1 Provision of essential supporting infrastructure and community facilities Other material considerations include: National Planning Policy Framework (March 2012) CIL Regulations, particularly Section 122 Supplementary Planning Guidance Developer Contributions SPD (September 2007) Affordable Housing SPD (2009) North Staffordshire Green Space Strategy – adopted December 2009
Reason for Recommendation. That substantial commencement can be extended from 12 months to 18 months to allow the delivery of the development, accounting for delays in completing a S106 agreement following the 9th November 2021 planning committee.
Reason for Recommendation. 7.1 Approval from the Councils of all seven members of the ARP partnership is required before the Operational Improvement Board of ARP are able to negotiate and enter into a Section 113 agreement with any other potential partners. RECOMMENDATIONS That Council note the report. That Waveney District Council instruct the Operational Improvement Board to negotiate and enter in to a Section 113 agreement with Norwich City Council so that officers’ services can be placed at all authorities disposal (shared). That approval is given for ARP management team to start working with Norwich City Council immediately to carry out any necessary work prior to 1st April 2017 that will assist with the commencement of the agreement. APPENDICES - none
Reason for Recommendation. 18. To enable the installation of the Real Time Passenger Information system in Salisbury and its extension onto four routes radiating from Salisbury to be progressed.
Reason for Recommendation. Following the receipt of up to date independent advice on the financial viability of the scheme it is concluded that the proposed development is still unable to support policy compliant Section 106 obligations. The scheme is still considered to represent a highly sustainable form of development that would contribute to the delivery of housing supply in the Borough. The site has been vacant for a number of years which does little to enhance the appearance of the area and its redevelopment will be beneficial to the area. A further deed of variation to allow an additional 12 months before a review mechanism is therefore considered necessary and appropriate.
