Report of the International Review Panel. Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Presider of the 64th meeting of the Panel, presented his report (Appendix 5), noting that the Panel issued the following recommendations:
Report of the International Review Panel. Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Coordinator of the 61th meeting of the IRP, presented his report (Appendix 3), indicating that the Panel had decided to make the following recommendations:
Report of the International Review Panel. Mr. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Coordinator of the 49th meeting of the IRP, presented his report (Appendix 2), noting that the Panel decided to make the following recommendations to the Meeting of the Parties:
Report of the International Review Panel. The Presider of the Panel presented his report. He noted that the Panel had the following recommendations for the Parties:
Report of the International Review Panel. The Presider of the 42nd meeting of the IRP presented his report to the Parties. In particular, he noted that the Panel was transmitting to the Parties a list of 104 vessels that had requested full-year DMLs for 2007 and that the Panel determined were qualified to receive them.
Report of the International Review Panel. Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Presider of the 62nd Meeting of the Panel, presented his report (Appendix 3), noting that the Panel recommended that the requests for the allocation of 103 DMLs for 2018 be approved. The Parties approved this allocation. Costa Rica noted that it had not been able to be present at that meeting, and therefore it wished to provide information on the Tuna Tracking Forms (TTFs) cases related to its fleet (TTF-30, TTF 31a, TTF 31b). It informed that the corresponding investigations had been carried out, which showed that due to institutional changes and staff replacements it had been impossible to locate and have access to the corresponding data and documents. Now, however, the Costa Rican authorities have all the information from the TTFs and therefore requested that the cases be closed. The Chairman indicated that they should officially inform the Secretariat of their request for closure as well as the reasons for terminating them.
Report of the International Review Panel. Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxx, of the United States, Presider of the 55th meeting of the Panel, presented his report (Appendix 4), noting that the Panel recommended taking a series of actions regarding three types of cases reviewed. The Meeting of the Parties approved these actions agreed by the Panel.
Report of the International Review Panel. Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (Nicaragua), Presider of the 65th meeting of the Panel, presented his report (Appendix 3), noting that the Panel decided to issue the following recommendations to the Meeting of the Parties:
Report of the International Review Panel. Lic. Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Presider of the 39th meeting of the IRP, presented a report to the Parties describing the work of the Panel. The Panel had three recommendations for the Meeting of the Parties:
Report of the International Review Panel. Lic. Xxxx Xxxxx XxXxxxxx, Presider of the 37th meeting of the IRP, presented a report to the Parties describing the work of the Panel, highlighting those matters which were discussed but not resolved. The MOP noted the list of vessels qualified for DMLs for 2005 provided by the IRP, and endorsed the Panel's decisions regarding the DMLs for the five vessels whose flag is in dispute between Bolivia and Colombia (Appendix 2), and the denial of a DML during 2005 for the vessel identified as vessel “G” in the report to the Panel of special cases. The Parties agreed on recommendations regarding transit waiver guidelines, after discussing and amending the proposal from the IRP (Appendix 3). Ecuador asked that all Parties advise the Secretariat of the authorities in each country who are responsible for the implementation of the guidelines, and that the Secretariat circulate this information to all Parties. The Parties approved the amendment to Xxxxx XXXX of the AIDCP (Appendix 4) as recommended by the IRP. Colombia asked that the minutes reflect that Colombia intends to implement a national observer program, consistent with the relevant provisions of the AIDCP.
