Results Overview. A wide variety of results were extrapolated from the preliminary data. Only pertinent results in developing WW’s goal, purpose, outcomes, and activities as well as the M&E plan have been included within this paper. The major findings from the research data can all be characterized into three different dimensions: resident demographics, health needs, and health access barriers. The results from each category are described in detail below.
Results Overview. This chapter presents the formulated monitoring and evaluation plan (M&E) for Willow Wellness L.L.C.’s pilot project at Willow Branch Apartment Complex. The chapter begins with a conceptual framework, a visual presentation of the theoretical framework that underpins the project. The chapter continues with the results framework and narrative summary demonstrating the project’s strategic plan for the intervention. The chapter concludes with a detailed Xxxxx timeline and log frame to convey the monitoring and evaluation steps needed to achieve the desired impact of the project.
Results Overview. The purpose of this chapter is to report the results of the evaluation. Results are presented by evaluation topic, with qualitative themes illustrated by representative quotes. Major topics include: fidelity, reach, dose delivered, dose received, acceptability, feasibility, awareness and use, customer reactions, sustainability, and suggestions for program improvement. Description of Participants A total of 72 Super Giant Food store customers agreed to participate in the survey and 72 customer intercept surveys were completed. The data in Table 4 provide descriptive statistics for the participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. The mean age of the participants was 50.2 (SD= 14.87). The majority of participants were female (66.7%), non-Hispanic (95.8%), and African-American (95.8%). Among respondents, the majority (53.5%) received a high school diploma or General Education Development (GED) diploma. Participants most commonly reported (55.6%) living in a home with no children under the age of 18. The majority of participants (57.7%) received federal nutrition assistance in the form of either SNAP or WIC; all participants who received WIC benefits were also SNAP recipients. Six Super Giant Food store employees agreed to participate in the key informant interview. Both male (n= 3) and female (n= 3) employees were interviewed. Employees also had varying Super Giant Food store responsibilities
Results Overview. Table 1 shows an overview of the number of sources considered for this literature scan. Table 1 Overview of the survey results per research topic Topic Number of papers consider per subtheme Communication technology IEEE 802.11 V2X communication technologies [22] C-V2X communication technologies [14] NewRadio (NR) and 5G V2X [7] Data collection and state estimation Sensor (and communication) technology [5] Cooperative sensing [3] Message design problem [5] State estimation (and prediction) [8] Data fusion [4] Data security [5] Control methods Mathematical approaches for control [5] Freeway onramps and weaving section management [10] Intersection management [13] Incentive schemes Management objectives achieved through incentive schemes [7] Monetary incentive schemes [10] Behavioural incentive schemes [7] User acceptance [8] 3 Communication technologies and technological architectures for V2X WP2 develops theories and algorithms whose real-world implementation would involve a dynamic, complex, and heterogeneous network. Each traffic participant needs to communicate with the Traffic Management Units (TMUs) their real-time positioning along each traffic control section, on top of their preferences. This would result in a huge influx of data to the TMUs on a drastically varying scale, as the number of traffic participants could vary sharply over time and location. Once the TMUs receive this data in full, they need to communicate back to each traffic participant their individualized control advice and the associated payment in next to no time. Since cooperative driving is a requisite for WP2, we regard Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) as the main candidates for traffic participants, given their capability of safely receiving and carrying out control advice. This is to be enabled by V2I, V2N, and V2V that together (with V2D and V2P) constitute a broader avenue— Vehicle to Everything (V2X) communication technologies that are far from ubiquitous. V2X has emerged to enable vehicles to communicate with their surroundings (e.g., adjacent vehicles, TMUs, etc.) and improve transportation safety and efficiency as a result. From a broader perspective, for a swarm to occur, each particle needs to have a perception of its own state with relation to the state of its neighbouring particles. In the case of WP2, TMUs represent the particles in the swarm and need to have a certain level of awareness of each other's actions and traffic state before their actions can establish a swarm...
Results Overview. The first evaluation question aimed to explore the demographics of participants. Analyzing the RR and GR showed that there was somewhat of a diverse group of attendees. Half joined from a southeastern state, while others joined from other parts of the United States. The most common race, sex, and education were white, female, and some college degree. The most common occupation was Peer Professionals. The most common employment setting indicated by participants was community health center. The second evaluation question addressed if OHS influenced the professional knowledge and skills of participants. Using GR and QR, participants indicated if their knowledge and skills enhanced as a result of OHS and if OHS were relevant to their careers. Over 90% of attendees agreed to OHS enhancing knowledge, skills and found relevance to career. The third evaluation question explored what aspects of OHS influenced engagement. After an analysis of ON and feedback from presenters and participants, it was apparent that multiple factors impacted engagement. Zoom features, topic discussions, and having proficient presenters all enhanced engagement. The fourth and final evaluation question reviewed barriers to delivering OHS. The following themes appeared as barriers to delivering OHS: low interaction and external factors. All of the data sources were used to inform which aspects could have operated as barriers.
