Technology Assessment Sample Clauses

Technology Assessment. (A) The City may notify Grantee on or after five (5) years after the Effective Date, that the City will conduct a technology assessment of Grantee’s Cable System. The technology assessment may include, but is not be limited to, determining whether Grantee's Cable System technology and performance are consistent with current technical practices and range and level of services existing in the fifteen (15) largest U.S. cable systems owned and operated by Grantee’s Parent Corporation and/or Affiliates pursuant to franchises that have been renewed or extended since the Effective Date. (B) Grantee shall cooperate with the City to provide necessary non-confidential and proprietary information upon the City’s reasonable request as part of the technology assessment. (C) At the discretion of the City, findings from the technology assessment may be included in any proceeding commenced for the purpose of identifying future cable-related community needs and interests undertaken by the City pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §546.

Technology Assessment. Medium‐ and heavy‐duty battery electric trucks and buses. xxxxx://xx0.xxx.xx.xxx/sites/default/files/classic//msprog/tech/techreport/bev_tech_report.pdf. Xxx, X., X. Xxxx, A.N. Xxxxx, X.X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxx. 2017. Elaborating the History of Our Cementing Societies: An in‐Use Stock Perspective. Environmental Science & Technology 51(19): 11468–11475. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1021/acs.est.7b03077. Xxx, X., X. Xxxx, X. Xxxxx, X. Xxx, X. Xxxx, and X. Xxx. 2018. A Probabilistic Dynamic Material Flow Analysis Model for Chinese Urban Housing Stock. Journal of Industrial Ecology 22(2): 377–391. xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/10.1111/jiec.12579. Xxxxxxxx‐Xxxxx, I., X. xx Xxxxxx, and X.X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx. 2019. Dynamic Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROI) and material requirements in scenarios of global transition to renewable energies. Energy Strategy Reviews 26: 100399. xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/retrieve/pii/X0000000X00000000. Xxxxxxxxxx, X., X. Xxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxxxxxx. 2010. Aviation Industry ‐ Mitigating Climate Change Impacts through Technology and Policy. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 5(2): 66–75. Xxxxxxxx, X.X., X.X. Xxxxx, and X. xxx Xxxxxx. 2019. Opportunities for large‐scale energy storage in geological formations in mainland Portugal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 99: 201–211. R xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/science/article/pii/X0000000000000000. Xxxxx, X. 2011. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Alternative Constructions of a Typical Australian House Design. Vol. 61. xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxx/xxxxxx‐access/204‐comparative‐life‐ cycle‐assessment‐of‐alternative‐constructions‐of‐a‐typical‐australian‐house‐design.html.

Technology Assessment. The Homecare consortium has elaborated a top 100 list of references on a variety of aspects of integrated care and, in particular, integrated homecare. Xxxxxx O, Xxxxxxxx C, Xxxx's J et al. (2010): Long-term implications of a single home-based educational intervention in patients with heart failure. Heart and Lung Vol. 39, NO. 6S. Xxxxxx A, Xxxx J, Xxxxxxxxx D, Xxxxxx J, Xxxxxx T (2012). Practical Guide on Home Health for COPD, FP7-HOMECARE-222954, Deliverable 11 Xxxxxxx X (2002): Elderly people's accounts of home care rationing: Missing voices in long- term care policy debates. Ageing and Society; 22(4):399-418. Xxxxxxxx X, Xxxxxxxx XX (2006): Integration and collaboration in public health - a conceptual framework. International Journal of Health Planning and Management; 21: 75- 88. Xxxxx I, Xxxx X, Xx Xxx L, Xxxxxx K, Xx Xxxxxx W (2008): Stroke caregivers' strain: prevalence and determinants in the first six months after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation; 30(7):523-520. Bakerly ND, Xxxxxx C et al (2009): Cost analysis of an integrated care model in the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Resp Disease 6(4):201-8. Xxxx L, Xxxx E et al (2001): Randomised controlled trial of specialist nurse intervention in heart failure. BMJ 323:715-18. Boelen C (2000): Towards Unity for Health. Challenges and Opportunities for Partnership in Health development. A Working Paper. Geneva: WHO. Xxxxxxx A et al (2011): Repetitive training of paretic hand in Integrated Homecare for Patients suffering from Stroke, p. 51 in Xxxxxx et al (Eds.): Recent Developments and Future Challenges of Integrated Care in Europe and Northern America, Programme and abstracts from The 11th International Conference on Integrated Care. Xxxxxxxxxx M, Xxxxx X, Xxxxx X, Xxxxxxxxxx G (2007): Being a close relative of a person with severe, chronic heart failure in palliative advanced home care - a comfort but also a strain. Scand J Caring Sci; 21:338-344. Xxxxxx XX (2000): Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. Journal of advanced Nursing; 32(2):301-309. Xxxxx A, Xxxxxxxxx T, Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxxx J et al (2006): Integrated care prevents hospitalisations for exacerbations in COPD patients. European Resp J; 28:1-8. Xxxx XX, Xxx XX (2007): Multi-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary, and trans-disciplinary in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promoters, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clin Invest Med. 30(6):E224-32. Xxxxxx X, Xxxxxx...

Technology Assessment. A. Sensitive Technical Data/Technologies: 1. Civil GPS-SPS equipment is an international commodity. GPS-PPS equipment may be similar to civil equipment, except for the addition of security components described below. The GPS was designed as a force multiplier for military war fighting missions requiring delivery of troops or munitions, including operations with diverse types of forces, while maintaining common references for positioning, navigation, and time. Access to GPS-PPS user equipment promotes interoperability among forces and directly enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of joint operations. The countries to participate will acquire GPS receivers and PPS devices in the receivers. Without the PPS devices and implementing software, the receivers are standard and not sensitive. The aspects of GPS-PPS to be protected are described in the following paragraphs. 2. Selective Availability/Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM). This module contains the anti- spoof decryption capability. a. The SAASM is unclassified but sensitive. b. Electronic design and manufacturing technology is not sensitive; the cryptographic process is sensitive. The MOA specifies that Country X must procure these chips from the U.S. via Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and account by quantity and application for all ships procured. Country X is not authorized to build the SAASM and no manufacturing data will be released. 3. PPS reception capability with SAASM (PPS-SAASM). This capability will allow Country X to receive/use full military accuracy of GPS directly from the GPS satellites. a. Country X will only be allowed access to PPS through purchase of equipment incorporating the PPS-SAASM. The PPS-SAASM is unclassified. b. Circuit design and information processing within the PPS-SAASM are sensitive. However, the PPS-SAASM incorporates tamper-resistant features to protect loss of information. The PPS-SAASM is also design to permit unclassified-when-keyed operation.

Technology Assessment. ‌ (A) The City may notify Grantee on or after January 1, 2017, that the City will conduct a technology assessment of Grantee’s Cable System. The technology assessment may include, but is not be limited to, determining whether Grantee's Cable System technology and performance are consistent with current technical practices and range and level of services existing in the fifteen (15) largest U.S. cable systems owned and operated by Grantee’s Parent Corporation pursuant to franchises that have been renewed or extended since January 1, 2012. (B) Grantee shall cooperate with the City to provide necessary non-confidential and proprietary information upon the City’s reasonable request as part of the technology assessment.

Technology Assessment. (A) The Grantor may notify Grantee on or after five (5) years after the Effective Date, that the Grantor will conduct a technology assessment of Grantee’s Cable System. The technology assessment may include, but is not be limited to, determining whether Grantee's Cable System technology and performance are consistent with current technical practices and range and level of services existing in the fifteen (15) largest U.S. cable systems owned and operated by Grantee’s Parent Corporation and/or Affiliates pursuant to franchises that have been renewed or extended since the Effective Date. (B) Grantee shall cooperate with the Grantor to provide necessary non-confidential and proprietary information upon the Grantor’s reasonable request as part of the technology assessment. (C) At the discretion of the Grantor, findings from the technology assessment may be included in any proceeding commenced for the purpose of identifying future cable-related community needs and interests undertaken by the Grantor pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §546.

Technology Assessment. Conduct a technology assessment to identify what UASs are currently available given commercial technology, as well as a prediction of what is likely to be available in the reasonable near-term. Participate in meetings and communications via electronic mail and telephone or teleconference with the COR and NSIR Project Technical Lead, as necessary, to discuss project status.

Technology Assessment. DOCRO shall assess for LEXON the current technical and clinical performance of the existing telomerase reagents as provided by LEXON and the inventor, Dr. H. E.

Technology Assessment. Marco’s Technology Assessment is designed to assist Client in identifying certain risks to Client’s network and other information technology. The Technology Assessment includes Marco’s review of a limited set of risks in eleven areas to the extent described below. Marco will gather information for the Technology Assessment by conducting interviews with Client personnel, conducting an onsite visit at the site(s) designated on this document and deploying an IT assessment software tool. Client consents to providing Marco access to its network and other information technology for purposes of conducting the Technology Assessment as described on Schedule A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Marco will provide a summary of its findings in a presentation that identifies its primary concerns, the potential business impact of those concerns, and its remediation recommendation(s). Upon request, Marco will provide Client with the technical report produced by the IT assessment software tool which contains the complete findings from that tool. Client understands and agrees that the Technology Assessment is not intended to be a comprehensive review of Client’s network and information technology and is not a replacement for any legal compliance review or regulatory audit. If Client has specific concerns that it would like Marco to address about its network or other information technology, Client agrees to disclose those concerns prior to Marco’s commencement of the Technology Assessment. The parties will then determine whether such concerns will be included in the Technology Assessment. To develop recommendations, the following risk areas will be considered:

Technology Assessment. In this section a general technology assessment of the various solar hydrogen technologies will be presented. I will not attempt a detailed economic assessment [such an assessment has been given by Xxxxxx et al. (1985)]; however, I will begin by restating an analysis I carried out six years ago for an IEA Workshop (Xxxxxx, 1989) because this emphasizes the constraints placed on any solar conversion process by the characteristics of solar radiation, as received at the Earth’s surface. Solar radiation is quite diffuse, having a normal irradiance of only ~1 kW m-2 in bright sunlight. This means that, if the average irradiance (over 24 hours a day and 365 days per year) is ~200 W m-2 (typical of the southwestern USA), the total annual solar energy received is 6.31 GJ. If the conversion efficiency is ~10%, then the useful energy (say as electricity) is 631 MJ or 175 kWh. This is equivalent to 2660 moles of H2 or ~66 standard m3 of H2. At $0.25/m3, the annual value of this hydrogen per m2 of collector area is only $16.50. At a 10% return on investment, the maximum capital cost that would be reasonable is $165 per m2. It is interesting that Xxxxxx et al. (1985) come to a very similar conclusion ($162 per m2) and note that only 36% of the capital cost is that of the solar reactor and collector system; the other 64% is comprised of piping and reactor support, field piping, gas compression and balance of plant. This means that any system for the solar generation of hydrogen from water will have to be very simple and fabricated from very cheap materials. Exotic and costly substances, such as Ru, are clearly too expensive for any practical system. The analysis also indicates that efficiency is the key to practical economic systems and that any system with an efficiency <10% doesn’t have much of a chance to succeed.