Second Meeting. If the First Meeting fails to resolve the dispute or if the Parties fail to meet, a senior executive for Company and for Authority, neither of which have day to day Contract responsibilities, shall meet, within ten (10) days after a dispute occurs, in an attempt to resolve the dispute and any other identified disputes or any unresolved issues that may lead to dispute. Authority may invite other parties as necessary to this meeting. If a party intends to be accompanied at a meeting by legal counsel, the other party shall be given at least three (3) working days’ notice of such and also may be accompanied by legal counsel. All negotiations pursuant to this clause are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of rules of evidence. Following the First Meeting and the Second Meeting, Authority will review Company’s claims and may (1) request additional information from Company which will be immediately provided to Authority, or (2) render a decision on all or part of the claim in writing within twenty-one (21) days following the receipt of such claim or receipt of additional information requested. If Authority decides that the work related to such claim should proceed regardless of Authority disposition of such claim, Authority will issue to Company a written directive to proceed. Company will proceed as instructed.
Second Meeting. If the Representatives cannot resolve the Claim within thirty (30) days after the Initial Meeting, then, upon the request of either Party, the Parties’ managers, supervisors, or other designated executives (the "Executives") shall meet again and attempt to resolve such Claim (the "Second Meeting").
Second Meeting. This meeting will be held no more than thirty (30) days after the first meeting. The meeting may be held in person or by electronic means. Two (2) representatives of PACT and two (2) representatives of Equity are quorum for this meeting. One (1) representative from each organization must be a representative from the first meeting and the other must be a new representative. The Executive Directors of both PACT and Equity (or their designates) must be present with voice but no vote. The representatives have freedom to resolve the issue by consensus or by majority vote.
Second Meeting. The program supervisor/administrator will review with the unit member the evidence of student learning collected by the unit member. The unit member and program specialist/administrator will also review and discuss the unit member’s PLSO Self Evaluation Form.
Second Meeting. If the First Meeting fails to resolve the dispute or if the parties fail to meet, a senior executive for Company and for Authority, neither of which have day to day Contract responsibilities, shall meet, within ten (10) days after a dispute occurs, in an attempt to resolve the dispute and any other identified disputes or any unresolved issues that may lead to dispute. Authority may invite other parties as necessary to this meeting. If a party intends to be accompanied at a meeting by legal counsel, the other party shall be given at least three (3) working days’ notice of such and also may be accompanied by legal counsel. All negotiations pursuant to this clause are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of rules of evidence. If Authority decides that the work related to such claim should proceed regardless of Authority disposition of such claim, Authority will issue to Company a written directive to proceed. Company will proceed as instructed.
Second Meeting. At Completion, the Seller and the Buyer must ensure that a meeting of the directors or shareholders (as appropriate) of the Company is convened following the meeting referred to in clause 5.4, and conducts the following business:
(a) such action as may be required to facilitate the Buyer's financing for this transaction; and
(b) authorising the dividend contemplated by this agreement.
Second Meeting. If it is ascertained that no quorum exists for the meeting in accordance with § 17(c)(i) or the vote without a meeting in accordance with § 17(c)(ii), in case of a meeting the chairman (Vorsitzender) may convene a second meeting in accordance with § 15 paragraph 3 sentence 2 SchVG or in case of a vote without a meeting the scrutineer (Abstimmungsleiter) may convene a second meeting within the meaning of § 15 paragraph 3 sentence 3 SchVG. Attendance at the second meeting and exercise of voting rights is subject to the Bondholders' registration. The provisions set out in § 17(c)(i) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Bondholders' registration for a second meeting.
Second Meeting. The team may wish to start the second meeting by asking for the signed letter agreement from the developer to provide funding for technical assistance. If the developer is not forthcoming with such an agreement, the meeting is a good time to address these concerns. Most municipal purchasing and financial officials will require the funding to be encumbered before a contract can be executed. While the municipality could fund the expense out of its general operating budget and then wait for a reimbursement, forward funding from a developer will ensure that the project will not affect the operating budget or municipal cash flow. In addition to funding being provided directly from the developer/gaming applicant, funding for technical assistance for the review and consideration of gaming establishments is available to host and surrounding communities through the Massachusetts Gaming Commission via three different mechanisms: First, under M.G.L. c. 23K, § 15(11), the Massachusetts Legislature has required that, “not less than $50,000 of the application fee shall be used to reimburse the host and surrounding municipalities for the cost of determining the impact of a proposed gaming establishment and for negotiating community mitigation impact agreements”.9 The Gaming Commission’s Community Disbursements program does not limit the amount of assistance to $50,000 (xxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/wp-content/uploads/memo-on- community-disbursements-1-29-2013.pdf). If a host community or surrounding community reaches agreement with a gaming applicant on funding to be made available for technical assistance, the community and gaming applicant can jointly sign and send a Letter of Authorization to the Commission. After the Comission processes a Grant Agreement with the community, the Commission with then provide the amount requested to the municipality via a grant agreement. If the amount requested is greater than the $50,000 reserved, the Commission will require the applicant to provide additional funds prior to disbursing them to the community. By issuing the funds in the form of a grant, towns will not need to wait until Town Meeting to appropriate and begin utilizing the funds. Second, the Gaming Commission has established a system whereby gaming applicants and potential surrounding communities can use the state’s Regional Planning Agencies (RPAs) to help evaluate the potential impacts of a gaming facility and advise potential surrounding communities. If an applicant agrees to...
