Statutory Basis. Unless a patient has objected to processing or joint processing and sharing and the sharing organisation has accepted the patient’s objection(s) the legal basis for sharing and viewing the shared records includes provisions of Section 251B of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (as amended by the Health and Social Care (Safety and Quality) Act 2015):
Statutory Basis. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,7 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),8 in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is reasonable and equitable as it would extend a current fee discount, thus effectively maintaining low fees for all market participants that trade in large-sized FX options on the Exchange.
Statutory Basis. The proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. FINRA believes that the proposed rule change would result in minimal costs to member firms, while providing additional investor protections where such policies do not currently exist, are not consistently applied or are less restrictive than the proposed changes. The proposed rule change will ultimately benefit the investor community, and promote greater trust in the brokerage industry, by reducing the potential exploitation of vulnerable investors. FINRA believes that establishing an industry-wide benchmark for situations in which registered persons request member firm approval to be named beneficiaries or to positions of trust mitigate potential conflicts of interest consistently across the industry for all customers.
Statutory Basis. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act. 11 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),12 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, and does not permit unfair 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
Statutory Basis. The Exchange represents that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) 7 of the Act in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) 8 in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among CBOE members. 9
Statutory Basis. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.7 Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,8 in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and other persons using any facility or system which the Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. The changes to Exchange execution fees and rebates proposed by this filing are intended to attract order flow to BATS Options by offering competitive pricing, especially for those who add liquidity that sets the NBB or NBO. As a general matter, the Exchange believes that the NBBO Setter Program benefits all Members with the potential of increased and aggressively priced liquidity at the Exchange. The expansion of the NBBO Setter Program to Members with a lower ADV threshold (albeit with a lower rebate) will result in increased payments that will benefit some Members due to the increased revenue those Members will receive. With the increase to the current threshold of 20,000 contracts ADV to 50,000 contracts ADV, some Members will no longer qualify for the highest First, the Exchange proposes to charge potential rebate, though they will still $0.25 per contract for a Customer order and $0.35 per contract for a Firm or Market Maker order that removes 6 An order that is entered at the most aggressive price both on the BATS Options book and according to then current OPRA data will be receive a higher rebate than otherwise offered by the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the NBBO Setter Rebate is liquidity from the BATS Options order determined to have set the NBB or NBO for purposes of the NBBO Setter Rebate without regard book where the Member has an ADV of 50,000 or more contracts. Accordingly, to whether a more aggressive order is entered prior to the original order being executed.
Statutory Basis. NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,6 which requires, among other things, that NASD rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change sets forth a comprehensive approach for member firms to provide and keep current required contact information, while also reducing unnecessary burdens on firms by eliminating the requirement that firms review and update the contact information on a quarterly basis; instead, firms would be required to conduct such reviews on an annual basis as well as to promptly update the information following any change.
Statutory Basis. 2.1 This Agreement is made pursuant to section 106 of the Planning Act section 111 of the Local Government Act 1972 and section 1 of the Localism Act 2011 and in pursuance of all other powers enabling the parties hereto with the intention that the covenants and restrictions are planning obligations and are enforceable by the Council and the County Council as applicable.
2.2 Nothing in this Agreement restricts or is intended to restrict the proper exercise at any time by the Council or the County Council of any of their statutory powers, duties, functions or discretions in relation to the Land or otherwise.
Statutory Basis. 2.1 This Deed secures planning obligations made pursuant to section 106 of the 1990 Act and is enforceable pursuant to section 106(3) of the 1990 Act against the Owners and any person claiming or deriving title to the Site (or any part or parts thereof) through or under the Owners as if that person had been an original covenanting party to this Deed.
2.2 This Deed is enforceable by the Council as local planning authority for the purposes of the 1990 Act.
2.3 To the extent that the covenants, restrictions and requirements in this Agreement are not made under section 106 of the 1990 Act they are made under section 1 of the Localism Act 2011 and section 111 of the Local Government Act 1972 and all other powers so enabling.
Statutory Basis. 3.1 This agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of section 106 and 106A of the Act and the covenants contained in this agreement are planning obligations for the purposes of those sections
3.2 Insofar as any of the covenants contained in this agreement are not planning obligations within the meaning of the Act they are entered into pursuant to the powers contained in section 111 of the Local Government Xxx 0000 Section 1 of the Xxxxxxxx Xxx 0000 and all other enabling powers.
3.3 The parties agree that the requirements of Regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 relating to planning obligations are satisfied
