Tracking Progress. The milestones, timelines and service standards set out in this Agreement, subject to any amendments, will provide the basis against which the MPMO will monitor the progress of the federal review and report on this progress in the MPMO Tracker.
Tracking Progress. The Managing Member shall track the progress of the Class A Member in reaching the Target Internal Rate of Return and make reports to the Members as contemplated in ARTICLE VII.
Tracking Progress. The Managing Member will calculate at least annually whether the Class B Member has reached the Target IRR and will send the Class B Member, within 120 days after the end of each Fiscal Year in which the Target IRR was not achieved, a report in the form of the Tracking Model showing where it believes the Class B Member is in relation to the Target IRR. If the report suggests that the Target IRR will be reached during the next two Fiscal Years, then the Managing Member will calculate and report whether the Class B Member has reached the Target IRR at least quarterly thereafter. The Managing Member will make its advisers available to answer any questions about its calculations. The Class B Member may invoke the dispute resolution procedures in Section 11.11(b) to resolve any item or procedure that is in dispute, and the conclusion of such dispute resolution procedures will apply in all subsequent periods to any identical item or procedure.
Tracking Progress. The milestones, timelines and service standards set out in this Agreement, subject to any amendments, will provide the basis against which the MPMO will monitor the progress of the federal review and report on this progress in the MPMO Tracker. The following are examples of situations where the MPMO may pause the timelines of the federal review:
a) the federal review is delayed at the request of the Proponent or another jurisdiction;
b) the CEA Agency and/or RAs have indicated that the Proponent is required to provide additional information necessary for the completion of the federal review, or that the information provided is insufficient;
c) the federal review cannot proceed as a result of circumstances related to Aboriginal engagement and consultation; or
d) litigation or other court action prevents the completion or continuation of the federal review. The Parties will use their best efforts to resolve any differences of opinion in the interpretation or application of this Agreement in an effective and timely manner. Issues relating to the federal review for the Project will be resolved through direct discussions and collaboration between the involved Parties, supported by the MPMO. Should issues remain outstanding, they will be referred to the appropriate senior level committee established through the MPMO Initiative.
Tracking Progress. The Managing Member will cause the Manager to calculate at least annually whether the Class B Members have reached the Target IRR and to send the Class B Members, within 120 days after the end of each Fiscal Year in which the Target IRR was not achieved, a report (the “Annual IRR Report”) showing where it believes the Class B Members are in relation to the Target IRR. The Class B Members holding a majority of the Class B Membership Interests may invoke the dispute resolution procedures in Section 12.11 to resolve any item or procedure that is in dispute, and the conclusion of such dispute resolution procedures will apply in all subsequent periods to any identical item or procedure.
Tracking Progress. The Managing Member will cause the Manager to calculate at least annually whether the Calculated Amount has equaled zero, and will send the Class B Members, within 120 days after the end of each Tax Year in which the Calculated Amount did not equal zero, a report in the form of the Tracking Model showing where it believes the Class B Members are in relation to the Calculated Amount.
Tracking Progress. The milestones, timelines and service standards set out in this Agreement, subject to any changes, will provide the basis against which the MPMO will monitor the progress of the federal review process and report on this progress in the MPMO Tracker. Pursuant to the MOU and in support of the Cabinet Directive, if the federal review should be stopped or interrupted, then the MPMO may pause the timelines. The following are examples of situations that may result in the pausing of the federal review process:
a) the review is delayed at the request of the Proponent, another jurisdiction or the Panel;
b) the Panel and/or the RAs have indicated to the Proponent and/or the MPMO a requirement to provide additional information necessary for the federal review process to proceed or progress, or that the information provided is insufficient;
c) the federal review process cannot proceed as a result of circumstances related to the Aboriginal engagement and consultation process; or,
d) litigation or other court action prevents the completion or continuation of the federal review process. Issues Resolution The Parties will use their best efforts to resolve any differences of opinion in the interpretation or application of this Agreement in an effective and timely manner. Issues relating to the EA, regulatory review or Aboriginal engagement and consultation in relation to the Project will be resolved through direct discussions and collaboration between the involved Parties, supported by the MPMO. Should issues remain outstanding, they will be referred to the appropriate senior level committee established through the MPMO Initiative.
Tracking Progress. Indicators such as those listed below may be tracked as evidence of progress, and will be cross analyzed by ethnicity, home language, country of origin, English proficiency, gender, and school of attendance: · Progress on kindergarten assessments · Progression on-time to the next grade level based on promotion/non-promotion or credits earned · Increasing student attendance · Reduction in student disciplinary actions · Reduction in student school mobility · Reduction in truancy · Reduction in disproportionality in academic achievement · Increasing of student success on one or more portions of state assessments required for graduation · Increasing family involvement in student learning The Initiatives developed by the Housing Authority include the tracking and verification of results as the key tool of program evaluation. Evaluation of programs may verify results in two ways:
1) Quality control and course correction. Collecting timely information about program services, client, and outcomes will provide a capability to improve Housing Authority-funded programs to ensure they are getting the intended results. Periodic, in-depth analysis of funded programs will be conducted to provide direction for course correction.
2) Overall reporting of the results. Annual reports will be provided to the [name of education organization] and Housing Authority identifying services provided and the key results.
Tracking Progress. The Manager shall calculate at least quarterly whether the Calculated Amount has equaled zero, and will send to the Members, within forty-five (45) days after the end of each Fiscal Quarter in which the Calculated Amount did not equal zero, and within ten (10) Business Days following any request by a Member, a report showing where it believes the Valero Member is in relation to the Calculated Amount.
Tracking Progress. Indicators such as those listed below may be tracked as evidence of progress, and will be cross analyzed by ethnicity, home language, country of origin, English proficiency, gender, and school of attendance: · Progress on kindergarten assessments · Progression on-time to the next grade level based on promotion/non-promotion or credits earned · Increasing student attendance · Reduction in student disciplinary actions · Reduction in student school mobility · Reduction in truancy · Reduction in disproportionality in academic achievement · Increasing of student success on one or more portions of state assessments required for graduation · Increasing family involvement in student learning The Initiatives developed by the Housing Organization include the tracking and verification of results as the key tool of program evaluation. Evaluation of programs may verify results in two ways:
1) Quality control and course correction. Collecting timely information about program services, client, and outcomes will provide a capability to improve Housing Organization -funded programs to ensure they are getting the intended results. Periodic, in-depth analysis of funded programs will be conducted to provide direction for course correction.
2) Overall reporting of the results. Annual reports will be provided to the [name of education organization] and Housing Organization identifying services provided and the key results. In collaboration with the [name of education organization]’s Student Services and Assessment Offices or other relevant division, participant data will be periodically matched with student educational records, such as academic achievement data, to ensure that important milestones are met, and results are being realized. Outcomes for students served by Housing Organization -funded programs will be compared to outcomes for other non-identified [name of education organization] students with similar characteristics. Program providers may also be required to collect and analyze more frequent data on the status of key performance measures. This approach will ensure that programs are on track toward achieving results.
