FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the Project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with BCEAO, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annexes IV and V show the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of the RA and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, the RA will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for the RA/FA to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information may not be necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RA/FA to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided and amended by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with the NL- ENVC to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a coordinated manner. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Annex IV shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the former CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the former CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is not necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency, continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project described in the Project Description provided by Manitoba Hydro. The CEA Agency and the Manitoba Conservation will coordinate the federal and provincial EA review processes, to ensure that joint steps are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be done pursuant to the Canada-Manitoba Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will work together with the RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA. The type of EA required is a screening. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is not necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIS, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. If a department or agency determines that it is no longer required to make a regulatory decision, it will end its participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from an RA, continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project.
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The Minister has determined that a JRP should be established pursuant to paragraph 40(2)(a) of the CEAA to consider the potential environmental effects associated with the Project under the CEAA. The JRP will determine whether the Project is also in “the public convenience and necessity” under the NEBA. The Parties will participate in and rely on the information gathered through the JRP process to fulfill their roles and responsibilities as defined under the CEAA and the NEBA, and where appropriate, to inform their legislative decisions. The Joint Review Panel Agreement (JRPA) entered into by the Minister and the Chair of the NEB will establish the JRP and its Terms of Reference. Following the submission of an application by the Proponent for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity under section 52 of the NEBA for the Project to the NEB, the JRP will release a hearing order detailing the hearing process to be followed. The JRP has statutory responsibilities pursuant to the CEAA and the NEBA. The JRP is not a Party to this Agreement. As part of finalization of the JRPA, the Minister and the Chair of the NEB will establish a single scope of project for the federal review also outlined in the JRPA. The current draft scope includes the construction, operation, decommissioning and abandonment of: an oil pipeline commencing near Bruderheim, Alberta and terminating at a new marine terminal located in Kitimat, British Columbia; a condensate pipeline commencing at a new marine terminal in Kitimat, British Columbia and terminating near Bruderheim, Alberta; a new marine terminal located at Kitimat, British Columbia; and, associated pump stations and other infrastructure components. Operations will involve the main activities to commission, operate and maintain the pipelines as well as the marine transportation of oil and condensate associated with the Project. In preparing its application, the Proponent will be expected to refer to the NEB’s Filing Manual, the JRPA, including the Terms of Reference, and a separate scope of factors document. Federal departments are to engage directly with the Proponent to convey their respective information requirements. Through the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory decisions required in relation to the Project. If no regulatory decisions are required for a department or agency, it will end its participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from the JRP or an RA, continue to participate as an expert FA sho...
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project includes the construction, operation, modification and decommissioning of the following Project components and activities: Onshore Facilities: • Subject to further information to be provided by the Proponents, the approximately 7.6km rail loop/ access road corridor located on lands managed by PRPA; • The operation of locomotives on the rail loop from the point of exiting and re-entering the Canadian National Railway mainline; • The approximately 120,000 tonne capacity potash storage building; • The approximately 6000 tph belt conveyor system and surge bin; • The dust collection system; • The storm/ washdown water collection and two stage settling pond treatment system; • Subject to further information to be provided by the Proponents, the new approximately 3.4km 69 kV powerline; and, • The use and operation of land disposal sites at the PRPA's disposal site on Xxxxxx Island, related to the project. Marine Facilities: • The approximately 925m long berth access trestle; • Dredging activities in relation to the, wharf structure, and any other project components; • The marine wharf including access to the construction site; • The marine outfall; • The operation of vessels while berthing and berthed at the marine terminal and while within harbour limits of the PRPA; and, • The loading, transportation, and disposal of dredged materials at an approved ocean disposal site. Temporary Structures: • On-site and off-site fabrication/construction sites and temporary on-site and off-site service facilities; • Any barge facilities/ landings/ lay down areas related to this Project; and, • Any new quarries developed by the Proponents for supplying materials for development of the railbed and terminal facilities. Other: • The construction related to fish habitat compensation; • New and/or upgrades to access roads, service roads and bridges associated with the development of this Project; and, • Any other ancillary components and activities associated with the project and located on PRPA lands and marine areas. The CEA Agency will work together with the RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process meets the requirements of the CEAA. The type of EA required is a comprehensive study. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal engagement and consultation. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory decisions required in re...
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. For the purposes of the EA, the Proponent has described the proposed Project as comprised of the proposed construction, operation, modification decommissioning or abandonment/reclamation, where appropriate, of the following project components and activities: • Construction, operation and decommissioning of the mine pit and process plant; • Mill tailings and waste rock storage facility(ies) including construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of dams and water diversion channels for the tailings storage facility; • Site runoff, diversion and sediment control; • Ore and marginal ore storage; • Borrow pits, overburden and topsoil storage; • Sewage and waste water management facilities; • Surplus water management and disposal; • Groundwater and/or surface water used for monitoring and/or extraction; • Explosives transport, factory and magazine; • Electrical power transmission lines and right of way to the project site; • An electrical substation at the project site; • Mine haul roads within the mine property; • Associated mine facilities such as assay buildings, ore load out facilities, labs, maintenance shops, warehouse, equipment lay down areas, office complex parking; • Routes for hauling the ore to the milling facility and for personnel access and delivery of supplies and materials to the site, including new or existing roads, or deep sea ports or sidings; • Existing and/or dedicated barge and barge facilities; • Any works or undertakings required as compensation for the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat that require an authorization under subsection 35(2) of the Fisheries Act; • The draining of Xxxxxx Xxxx and the construction, operation and dismantling of the structures associated with the dewatering activity; • Construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of water intake on Xxxxxxxx Lake; and, • Construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of diffuser below the surface of Xxxxxxxx Lake. The CEA Agency will work together with the RAs and the expert FAs to ensure that the EA process meets the requirements of the CEAA. The type of EA required is a comprehensive study. The CEA Agency and the BCEAO will coordinate their respective review processes to ensure that joint steps are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be done consistent with the Canada-British Columbia Agreement for Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX show...
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. As proposed by the RAs, the preliminary scope of the Project includes the physical works and activities associated with the construction, operation and decommissioning of the following project components: stream crossings related to a proposed access corridor; on-site roadways and power/gas line; ancillary features located on Reserve lands; explosives mixing (factory) and storage (magazine) facilities; and, site water management facilities that would result in the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat and impact to navigation, including dewatering facilities and water diversion channels.
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed scope of the Project is the project as described in the Project Description as provided by the Proponent. The CEA Agency has commenced a comprehensive study and will coordinate the federal process with the New Brunswick Department of Environment, to ensure that the respective federal and provincial requirements are met in a manner consistent with the development of a Joint Provincial-Federal Terms of Reference, joint review of the EIA, and some concurrent consultation on the EIA. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review process. Xxxxx XX shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal consultation. Xxxxx XX shows the milestones and service standards for the regulatory review for each department. The CEA Agency will seek the participation of RAs and expert FAs to ensure that the EA process results in an efficient and effective EA that complies with the requirements of the CEAA and its regulations. During the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory or other s. 5 decisions required in relation to the Project that are triggers pursuant to the CEAA. As such, the Proponent is expected to submit all necessary applications to allow confirmation of triggers prior to the EA decision. Submission of the regulatory and technical information necessary for RAs to make their regulatory decision within the proposed timeframe is at the discretion of the Proponent. Although that information is not necessary for the EA decision, the Proponent is expected to submit it concurrent with the EIA, for the RAs to meet the regulatory timelines set out in this Agreement. If a department or agency determines that a regulatory decision or other trigger decision is not required, it may, upon request from the CEA Agency continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project. In the event that no triggers for the EA remain, the CEA Agency will terminate the EA.
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. As proposed by the RAs, the preliminary scope of the Project includes: • All marine components of the project (wind turbines, offshore converter station, submarine transmission cables to mainland and Haida Gwaii, and submarine power lines between wind turbines); and, • Components which are on federal (PRPA) lands (onshore converter station, onshore transmission line, staging, operations, and maintenance infrastructure). The RAs will work together with the expert FAs to jointly meet their responsibilities under the CEAA. The RAs have determined that the type of EA required is a screening. The CEA Agency and the BC EAO will coordinate their respective review processes, to ensure that joint steps are undertaken wherever that can appropriately be done pursuant to the Canada- BC Environmental Assessment Cooperation Agreement. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the federal review processes. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal engagement and consultation. Through the EA process, RAs will confirm any regulatory decisions required in relation to the Project that are included in the CEAA. If no regulatory decisions are required for a department or agency, it will end its participation in the EA as an RA, but may, upon request from an RA, continue to participate as an expert FA should it be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project.
FEDERAL REVIEW PROCESS. For the purposes of the EA, the Proponent has described the Project as comprised of the proposed construction, operation, modification and decommissioning or abandonment/reclamation, where appropriate, of the following components and activities: • Two open pit mining areas at Burnt Ridge and Mount Xxxxxxx; • Associated facilities, including transportation and electrical transmission infrastructure; marshalling area, fueling stations and parts storage areas; • Surface water management and treatment systems including settling ponds and drainage structures; waste rock storage; coal stockpile and sorting areas; and overburden and soil storage; and, • Storage of waste rock and process coal rejects from the Project within the current Line Creek operations. The RA will work with the expert FAs to meet their responsibilities under the CEAA. The type of EA required is a screening, the conduct of which has been delegated to the BCEAO. Annex I shows a Xxxxx chart of the review process. Annex II shows the key milestones and service standards for the EA as well as Aboriginal engagement and consultation.
