Question 6. Have you had any one or more of these symptoms today or within the past 24 hours, which is new or not explained by a pre-existing condition? • Fever of 100.4˚ or greater, Chills, or Repeated Shaking/Shivering • Cough • Sore Throat • Shortness of Breath, Difficulty Breathing • Feeling Unusually Weak or Fatigued • Loss of Taste or Smell • Muscle Pain • Headache • Runny or Congested Nose • Diarrhea • Check One: □ Yes □ No
Question 6. Can we escalate pricing during the year for market changes? HCC Answer: Price changes will be considered by the Executive Director, Procurement Operations, upon receipt of a written request from the Contractor at least thirty (30) calendar days before the price change is to occur. The Contractor may request price changes not more often than quarterly. Written documentation, based on Independent Industry Standards, shall support all price changes. Question #7: Do you receive any state or federal funding? HCC Answer: State funding.
Question 6. Can you please discuss the scope of the project and what is anticipated to be included? Answer: The general scope as it is outlined in the solicitation is for Architectural Services to design, permit, and provide bidding assistance for a brand-new Field Operations Facility located on a designated property that is owned by the City of Port Orange. The zoning is appropriate so there will be no zoning issues. A decent amount of civil work will be required. The facility will be an all-inclusive facility that includes office space, storage space (enclosed and open storage), and other civil work such as a potential Vac Truck Pump-out pit connected to the sanitary system.
Examples of Question 6 in a sentence
Please remember that, as described in Question 6, you will not receive a new stock option on the replacement grant date in exchange for those options with an exercise price less than $1.30 even though you are required to submit them for cancellation in order to participate in the Stock Option Exchange Program.
Once you have withdrawn options, you may re-elect to exchange options only by again following the election procedure described in the answer to Question 6.
In view of the broad definition of “Beneficial Ownership,” it may be prudent to include such shares in your beneficial ownership disclosure and then disclaim beneficial ownership of such securities pursuant to Question 6.
However, if you are an active participant in an employer-sponsored plan, your contributions will be deductible only if the income of you and your spouse, if any, is below certain limits (see Question 6 on page 10).
If either you or your spouse is an active participant in an employer-sponsored retirement plan, the allowable tax deduction for a Spousal IRA for that year may be reduced or eliminated in accordance with the rules explained in the answer to Question 6.
More Definitions of Question 6
Question 6. 9: (Goal 2, Objective 2A&B; Goal 3, Objective 3A&B) • Indicate the 17th XX XXXX xxxxx funded service/activity for reporting period. (refer to your Goals and Objectives on your grant application) *Report only on the progress of the goals set forth in your grant application. • Include number of victims served, specific service(s) provided and grant recipient agency personnel providing service; number of persons trained, specific training(s) conducted and grant recipient agency conducting training, etc. • Enter N/A if not funded for Goal 2, Objective 2A, 2B or Goal 3, Objective 3A or 3B
Question 6. The Principal Structural Engineer and Structural Engineer Project Two indicates Mixed-use Multi story “Tilt-Up”. Is multi-story tilt up the only structural solution you are considering? Answer 6: No final decision on the structure has been made. Tilt-Up is just one option among many. Question 7: Regarding the structural project two requirement (RFP Section 5.3-F-m & n), is there flexibility for the mixed-use multi-story tilt up project? Could either single story tilt up or multi story precast concrete projects be considered instead to show similar structural experience? Answer 7: Yes, single story tilt-up or multi story precast concrete projects are acceptable. Question 8: Please confirm that only the Prime Offeror is required to submit a Certificate of Insurance with our Proposal, per section 5.1 (page 40), under Tab F. It is our understanding that subcontractors will only be required to submit Certificates of Insurances upon award of the contract. Answer 8: Yes, only the Prime Offeror is required to submit a Certificate of Insurance. Question 9: Similar to the DCC Contract, will MD DGS allow Maryland Architecture or Engineering licenses to be in pending status with MD DLLR if the proposer provides documentation supporting that the license application has been submitted and is pending / under review at the time of submission? Answer 9: The Technical proposal submission due date has been extended to facilitate obtaining MD professional licenses. Maryland Licenses must be secured at the time of Technical submission, pending Licenses at time of submittal are NOT ACCEPTABLE. Question 10: The RFP provides requirements for qualifications in section 5.3, F., 4. Please confirm if project examples must be for constructed projects or could also reflect projects where design has been completed and construction is in process. Answer 10: All projects must be completed. Question 11: The RFP provides requirements for qualifications in section 5.3, F., 4 indicating a maximum of three (3) are to be completed projects by the lead design firm as “Architect of Record.” Please confirm if projects submitted by the lead design firm where they served as Lead Architect and Designer of Record responsible for developing a prescriptive design and criteria for an alternative delivery procurement would be acceptable. Answer 11: No - Only projects from the “Architect of Record” are acceptable. “Architect of Record” is the licensed Architect that signs and seals the Construction Documen...
Question 6. What if we get poor quality service from a vendor, or they are consistently not meeting the delivery schedule, are invoicing us incorrectly, are shipping partial orders, etc? Answer 6: First, report their performance to this office by completing a “Vendor Performance Report” (VPR) to this office. We will intercede and make a determination on how to resolve the problem. Another solution is you have a choice between vendors. Use those choices to your advantage. You can easily penalize a vendor by simply not electing to use them on future procurements.
Question 6. The RFQ says that behind Tab 2, we should “provide a list of at least three (3) similar contracts performed in the past five (5) years…” and Addendum 3, answer 20 says we “may list ten relevant contracts” – it sounds like 10 is an example and not a maximum, but can you confirm that? Answer 6: Yes, it is an example. You may list more or less than 10. Question 7: Also, for Tab 4, the RFQ says “provide summaries of at least three projects” and Addendum 3, answer 20 says “in Tab 4, you may only choose three of” the previously listed projects. Could you clarify if the Tab 4 projects have a minimum of 3 or maximum of 3? Please also confirm that the projects listed in Tab 4 must be included in the Tab 2 list.
Question 6. If an institution meets the qualifications for a religious exemption under section 600.9(b) of the regulations, but the institution is subject to State licensing or approval requirements independent of its status as a religious institution, is the institution considered exempt from demonstrating State legal authorization for HEA purposes?
Question 6. The FDIC invites comment on all aspects of this section of the proposal.
Question 6. Meaning of “committed sectors”: As said above, an obligation from a Services Chapter may contain a scope that is limited to committed sectors only. Assuming that a future FTA of Party A contains such obligation. What could other Xxxx Parties claim from Party A on the basis of the Xxxx MFN obligation? Two typical scenarios may occur. First, the future FTA adds new sectors compared to Xxxx but does not subtract sectors. Then most probably Xxxx Parties could claim the same treatment as provided by the obligation of the FTA and limited to those sectors that are committed in the FTA, not those of Xxxx. Second, the future FTA adds but also subtracts sectors, subsectors or activities. Then, could other Xxxx Parties claim to Party A to apply Xxxx obligations to each added sector? Or would it be concluded that none of the two sets of sectors (Xxxx and FTA) is globally bigger in size, or the FTA may even be a smaller set, and thus the balance is different but not “more favorable” and the Xxxx MFN does not apply? A complex situation arises if Party A has several bilateral FTAs with the said provision (or slight variations thereof), but the array of committed sectors is not identical in all FTAs. This question is particularly relevant in relation to lists of sectors attached to commitments on Contractual Service Suppliers (CSS).