Analysis of Alternatives. The major goal of this project is to develop a solution that allows for the pre-population of defined data elements from EHR to clinical research systems, based on current organizational infrastructure and workflow. Ultimately, the project aims to decrease research timelines and costs by reducing the need for manual data transmission across systems in addition to improving organizational workflow. This project will aid in reaching the organization’s goals to 1). Conduct innovative and collaborative research and integrate this knowledge into the practice of medicine 2). Advance the early detection, treatment, and prevention of disease and 3). Facilitate operational processes that support the efforts of the clinical research team in the timely initiation, management and completion of clinical trials at Emory. Through these goals and project implementation, the organization will contribute to federal initiatives to • Support and encourage the use of seamless data exchange • Advance scientific knowledge and innovation • Advance the health, safety, and well-being of the American people • Increase the economic impact of Federally- funded research and development by accelerating and improving the transfer of new technologies from the laboratory to the commercial marketplace
Analysis of Alternatives. Consider alternative approaches to the design of the Project, with the aim of best meeting Princeton University’s stated objectives for the Project, including scope, cost, schedule, and design intent.
Analysis of Alternatives. Analyze and develop alternative approaches to the design of the Project for the purpose of maximizing Owner’s objectives for the Project, including scope, cost, Schedule, design intent, and sustainability, energy management and materials specification. Perform the following:
.1 Review with Owner a number of alternative approaches to the overall design and construction of the Project as set forth in Architect Release.
Analysis of Alternatives. The consultants will analyze alternative sitting of transmission lines and substations in terms of their environmental and social impacts and benefits and check viability of route selection undertaken by NTDC in feasibility stage (PC-I). The analysis should include the siting process, based on the description of the selected route, environmental and social constraints (such as protected areas, settlements, cultural heritage etc.), the alternative routes and the justification for the choice. Based on the selected route, the consultant will identify and prepare maps showing the corridor of impact (Col). The analysis of alternatives will also avoid/minimize these impacts. 1xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xx/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Nachhaltigkeit/FZ- 2xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/wps/wcm/connect/554e8d80488658e4b76af76a6515bb18/Final+- 3xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/wps/wcm/connect/66b56e00488657eeb36af36a6515bb18/Final+-+Electric+Transmission+and+Distribution.pdf?MOD=AJPERES environmental and social issues. The consultation will also receive feedback on the expected social issues related to the project impact and suggested mitigation measures. The stakeholders will include the primary stakeholder (those directly affected by the intervention) and secondary stakeholders (those indirectly affected and those who have an interest in the project) the consultant will document the proceedings of the consultation along with the list of participants and photographs.
Analysis of Alternatives. Scoping exercise, (i.e. ToR issued by MoEF) does not specify any need for alternatives. Hence this exercise has not been done.
Analysis of Alternatives. Interested Parties shall have 45 calendar days upon receipt to review the proposed amendment to determine whether it may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a contributing resource in a manner that would diminish integrity of the WRAMC Historic District and to provide comments in writing to DOS.
Analysis of Alternatives. Based on an analysis of alterna- tive sites, sizes, production processes and environmental control techniques for any major source that is located in an area desig- nated under 42 USC 7407 (d), that the benefits of the construction or modification of the major source significantly outweigh the environmental and social costs imposed as a result of the major source’s location, construction or modification.
Analysis of Alternatives. Task 4.1 Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) Purpose: To document existing traffic conditions as well as future traffic conditions (2035) resulting from this specific project and its alternatives. The TEPA will be used to determine the scope and magnitude of the Traffic Analysis Study/Report that will be performed during the Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) phase. Approach: The approach is consistent with Caltrans' guidelines for traffic impact analysis to be conducted for PSR-PDS. The following will be conducted:
Analysis of Alternatives. This task will analyze the following five options from the 2006 MACTEC alternatives study for a potential superior project alternative. RAINFALL RECURRENCE AVG. ANNUAL CAPTURE ANNUAL LOAD REDUCTION (LBS) CER - $ PER LB OF TSS REMOVED Estimated Load Reductions for Option 3 (Wet pond as Treatment BMP) 85th Percentile 93% 361,171 $1.1 2-year 96% 372,643 $2.7 10-year 98% 381,247 $3.4 25-year 100% 387,198 $4.3 Estimated Load Reductions for Option 22 85th Percentile 89% 18,059 $6.2 2-year 91% 18,632 $6.6 10-year 96% 19,627 $9.3 25-year 100% 20,379 $10.2 Estimated Load Reductions for Option 18 85th Percentile 93% 361,171 $1.3
Analysis of Alternatives
