ANTECEDENTS. The AGENCY intends to procure the Project with an Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) of AMOUNT (Php 00.00) as reflected in the AGENCY’s [year] Annual Procurement Plan (APP), and as listed in Annex A, hereinafter referred to as the “Projects.” The specifics of the projects are duly reflected and fully disclosed in the respective Agency Procurement Request and Terms of Reference or Technical Specifications for each requirement submitted to PS-DBM. The AGENCY has offered to engage and PS-DBM has accepted to undertake the procurement activities in relation to the above subject to the execution of herein agreement. Accordingly, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual obligations, stipulations, and agreements in this Agreement, the AGENCY and PS-DBM agree to contract as follows:
ANTECEDENTS. 1. In its desire to offer to its clients a service consistent with technological advances, The Bank offers the product and service known as the Online Banking System. For his part, The Client is interested in gaining access to the indicated service.
ANTECEDENTS. As a result of the socioeconomic investigation conducted by Corporación Xxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxx (XXX, 0000) at Santa Xxxxxxx, important social issues that require attention were uncovered. These are:
ANTECEDENTS. As part of the work safety and health specific program, a descriptive assessment of the main requirements to be fulfilled in each stage of the project has been conducted. These requirements are shown in the following table. The table presents a summary of all actions that are to be planned and implemented in order to prevent, eliminate, or minimize safety and health risks. The requirements follow legal obligations and guidelines specified in: The General Law of Labor The General Law of Health The General Law of Civil Protection The State Law of Civil Protection Environmental and Social Action Plan Page 45 At the same time, this regulatory framework follows guidelines established by different agreements and recommendations issued by the International Labor Organization (ILO) and ratified by the Federal Government. Through this ratification, the mandates established in these agreements become of obligatory observance in Mexico. In Mexican regulation, health and safety issues and civil protection requirements are managed by agencies different from SEMARNAT. For this reason, they are not included in the EIM as part of the overall assessment of the project.
ANTECEDENTS. The development of the PCDP is based on the results and conclusions of the EIM, the Socio-Economic Survey (2000 and 20005; CAM), and the consultations conducted during the first stage of communication of the project summarized in Section 1.5 (CRC). Additionally, the regulations derived from the Municipal and State development plans 2006-2011, Citizen Participation Law of the State of Baja California Sur and the Law on Urban Image for the City and Port of Santa Xxxxxxx were considered. To address the described impacts, the PCDP contemplates the implementation of the following specific programs:
ANTECEDENTS. 1.1 CHAMBARA is regular of 100% of the rights and actions of the mining concessions that are detailed in the document that, like I Annex TO, it is integral part of the present instrument ("THE CONCESSIONS").
ANTECEDENTS. I. On April 7, 1995 by Presidential resolution published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, the Interministerial Divestiture Commission was created.
ANTECEDENTS. Republic Act (RA) No. 7227, as amended by Republic Act No. 9400, mandates the BCDA to accelerate the sound and balanced conversion into alternative productive civilian uses of the Xxxxx and Subic military reservations and their extension, and to enhance the benefits to be derived from said properties in order to promote the economic and social development of Central Luzon in particular and the country in general as well as to provide funds for the AFP Modernization Program. Executive Order No. 605, Series of 2007 directs all departments and agencies of the Executive branch, including all government-owned and/or controlled corporations (GOCCs) and government financial institutions (GFIs), to adopt the ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems (QMS) as part of the implementation of a government-wide quality management program. In compliance with the Executive Order, BCDA established its QMS in 2014, achieving certification to the ISO 9001:2008 standard the same year and successfully transitioning to the ISO 9001:2015 standard in 2017. BCDA is in need of the consulting services of a certifying body that will conduct the next cycle of recertification audits of the BCDA QMS to the ISO 9001 standard. For this purpose, BCDA has conducted the bidding for the said services in compliance with Republic Act No. 9184. BCDA is desirous that the Consultant conduct the recertification audit and thus, BCDA has accepted the proposal for (proposal amount in words) (proposal amount in figures) by the Consultant for the execution and completion of such Consulting Services. ACCORDINGLY, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises, and in accordance with the stipulations and conditions hereinafter stated, the Parties hereby agree and bind themselves to the following:
ANTECEDENTS. The AGENCY intends to procure [ITEM | PROJECT] with Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) of [value], hereinafter referred to as the “Project.” The AGENCY decided to tap the services of the PS as Procurement Agent to undertake all of the AGENCY’s procurement activities for the Project/s. Republic Act No. 9184 (RA 9184), otherwise known as the “Government Procurement Reform Act,” which became effective on 26 January 2003, including its associated revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR), provide for the rules and procedures to be followed in the conduct of government procurement activities. RA 9184, while authorizing the AGENCY to conduct its own procurement activities, provides for certain instances where assistancefrom other government agencies may be sought. Section 7.3.3 of the 2016 IRR of RA 9184 provides:
ANTECEDENTS. From January 9, 2006 until February 2, 2007, the petitioner, a domestic corporation dealing with medical equipment and supplies, delivered to and installed medical equipment and supplies at the respondent’s hospital under the following contracts:
