Department of Children and Families. 1. A DCF representative will be designated, as needed to participate in the following interagency collaborative initiatives:
a) Case Staffing Committee Meetings (F.S. 984.12).
b) Truancy/Drop Out Prevention Subcommittee of the Clay County Juvenile Justice Council
c) Training and in-service activities related to truancy intervention.
Department of Children and Families a. Children’s mental health services should be developed and coordinated to augment any local system of care for high-risk populations served by the Department of Children and Families, community based care providers, or by the Department of Juvenile Justice. (e.
Department of Children and Families. It means, where appropriate from the context, the Division, Commission, Bureau, Office, Unit or other designated component of the Department of Children and Families responsible for the administration of particular Contract programs.
Department of Children and Families. Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Regional Managing Director Date
Department of Children and Families. Signature: Date:
Department of Children and Families. Division of Early Care and Education DCF-F (CFS-2345) (R. 03/2009)
Department of Children and Families. Also referred to as DCF.
Department of Children and Families. In accordance with Section 8 of the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2022-2023, effective July 1, 2022, the minimum annual base rate of pay for each eligible unit employee shall be $41,600. In addition to the inflation pay adjustment, each unit employee shall receive a special pay adjustment equal to the increase necessary to attain the minimum annual base rate of pay of $41,600, or an additional 5 percent increase to the employee’s June 30, 2022, base rate of pay after the inflation pay adjustment is made, whichever is greater. This applies to institutional security specialists in the following classes:
(1) Institutional Security Specialist I (8237);
(2) Institutional Security Specialist II (8238); and
(3) Institutional Security Specialist Shift Supervisor (8240).
Department of Children and Families. (CORPORATE SEAL) Department of Children and Families, Circuit 17 BY: ATTEST: Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Circuit Administrator , Secretary -or- Witness Witness Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Subject to execution by the Parties: ____________________________________ Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Circuit Legal Counsel, DCF/Circuit 17 The Following Notarization is Required for Every Agreement Without Regard to Whether the Agency Chose to Use a Secretary’s Attestation or Two (2) Witnesses. STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______day of , 20 by of Name of Person Department of Children and Families, Circuit 17 on behalf of the Corporation/Agency. He/She is personally known to me or produced as Type of Identification identification and did/did not first take an oath. My Commission Expires: Signature - Notary Public (SEAL) Printed Name of Notary Notary’s Commission Number (CORPORATE SEAL) ChildNet, Inc. BY: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, CEO ATTEST: , Secretary -or- Witness Witness STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______day of , 20 by of Name of Person ChildNet, Inc. on behalf of the Corporation/Agency. He/She is personally known to me or produced as Type of Identification identification and did/did not first take an oath. My Commission Expires: Signature - Notary Public (SEAL) Printed Name of Notary Notary’s Commission Number (CORPORATE SEAL) WorkForce One BY: ATTEST: Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, CEO/President , Secretary -or- Witness Witness Approved as to form by the office of the County Attorney for Broward County, Florida XXXXXXX X. XXXXXX, County Attorney Governmental Center 000 X. Xxxxxxx Ave. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 BY: Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______day of , 20 by of Name of Person WorkForce One on behalf of the Corporation/Agency. He/She is personally known to me or produced as Type of Identification identification and did/did not first take an oath. My Commission Expires: Signature - Notary Public (SEAL) Printed Name of Notary Notary’s Commission Number (CORPORATE SEAL) Agency for Persons with Disabilities, Area 10 BY: ATTEST: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, Area Administrator , Secretary Witness Witness Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Subject to execution by the Parties: ____________________________________
Department of Children and Families. The views expressed here are those of the authors alone. The authors thank Xxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxx Xxxxx for assistance in preparing this report. Decades of research, in the United States and elsewhere, have documented economic challenges for women following divorce (see, e.g., Xxxxxxxx, 2000; Xxxxx-Xxxxxx et al., 2018; Xxxxxxx et al., 1999; Xxxxxx et al., 2020; Xxxxxxxx & Xxxx, 2002; xx Xxxx et al., 2017; Xxxxxx & Xxx, 2016; Xxxxxxx, 2008, 2009; Xxxxxxxxxx, 2022; Xxxxxx & Xxxxx, 1991; Xxxxxxxxxx, 2020). Focusing on one to six years after divorce, recent studies find declines of 25–30% in women’s income (Xxxxx-Xxxxxx et al., 2018; xx Xxxx et al., 2017), as well as substantial declines in personal wealth (Xxxxxx, 2021; Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2021). Divorce is also associated with lower levels of financial satisfaction, with more severe effects on women than men (Fan and Xxxxxxx 2019). Numerous studies confirm that the negative economic impacts of divorce for women are most pronounced for mothers, particularly those with young children (Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, 2008; Xxxxxxx et al., 1999; Xxxxxxx, 2008, 2009; Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2016). Child support has long been viewed as at least a partial remedy, and research has confirmed an important role for child support in increasing divorced women’s economic well-being (Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx, 2020; Xxxxxxx et al., 1999; Xxxxxx et al., 2020; Xxxxxx & Xxxxx, 2018; Xxxx & Xxxx, 2015). Beyond child support, mothers’ increased earnings and repartnering have both emerged as important strategies in economic recovery after divorce (for a review, see Xxxxxxxxxx, 2020). For over two decades, the Institute for Research on Poverty (IRP), with support from the Bureau of Child Support, has explored the economic impacts of divorce and the role of child support on mothers’, and sometimes fathers’, economic well-being in Wisconsin. In early work in this vein, Xxxxxxxx (1997) examined the role of child support in increasing divorced mothers’ needs-adjusted income, reducing poverty, and reducing economic inequality between divorced mothers and fathers. That work, focusing on divorces in the late 1980s and early 1990s, found a major impact, with child support increasing the income-to-poverty ratios of mothers with sole Since then, the trajectory of research on economic outcomes of divorce in Wisconsin has been influenced by the rapid growth of shared placement in the state (Xxxxxxx et al., 2014; Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx, & Xxxx 2017). In particular, research has p...
