Enabling Measures Sample Clauses

Enabling Measures. Our proposals We would like to: • Continue to explore further potential flexibilities relating to Housing Market Renewal including: - developing propositions for aligning HMR resources together with those from the Regional Housing Board Single Pot, and the Decent Homes programme with the LAA. - having a forward programme for opening up a dialogue on the pooling of all ODPM capital resource on housing and sustainable communities from April 2008 onwards. (Note: as part of the City Summit Business Case submission, we are going further than this and requesting wider flexibilities on capital spending between funding blocks and also on earmarking capital receipts.) • The Local Authority to have formal involvement or influence with regard to the procurement of Section 4 accommodation by NASS (accommodation for failed / end of process asylum seekers) • In recognition of the cross-cutting nature of substance misuse issues we will develop the Safer Communities Partnership statutory overview of Substance Misuse target delivery to ensure that each SFA block is making an appropriate contribution to the strategy's delivery. We will also discuss the potential for further alignment of relevant funding. • Remove the capital/revenue split on elements of the funding that make up our successful neighbourhoods pot – ie. Home Office elements. • Develop a package of freedoms and flexibilities within the Mixed Communities Pilot during 2006. We shall develop specific proposals for discussion at the mid year review. • Seek initial exemption of automatic inclusion of calls recorded through the Single Non-Emergency Number within our crime statistics. We will wish to evaluate the impact of the system and have clear processes in place to ensure that recording is accurate and appropriate. • With regard to National Asylum Support Service (NASS) procurement through Section 4 or the private provider it is necessary to have greater local control to ensure there is less propensity for the provision of accommodation for asylum seekers to have negative impacts on the closing the gap agenda and HMR. Summaries of the business case for these requests are provided in ANNEX A. Pooling: Our proposals Housing solutions (Homelessness) funding We aim to place the funding for Housing Solutions into one single budget area to enable local discretion and development of locally specific services to address homelessness prevention and development of housing solutions. These funds include the Homelessness Inn...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Enabling Measures. Ref: Activity Timescale Progress
Enabling Measures. GP Clinical Systems will need to be enhanced to support CVD risk calculation and the care plan record. • GP Clinical Systems will need to be enhanced to enable the minimum data set to be auto populated and to be recorded and data to be returned. • GP systems will be developed to support GPs to proactively identify the cohort of patients requiring complex care and information to enable quality improvement. • Data governance will be established in line with GDPR requirements. • Individual patient consent for early detection, treatment and data sharing for various necessary functions will need to be collected by the GP at registration. The HSE will develop the consent method and materials. • Supports to practices to enhance diagnostic ability and practice nurse capacity will be required (it is estimated that over 247 additional practice nurse WTE’s will be required to serve the GMS/GPVC population identified with chronic diseases). • Additional capacity for non-practice based diagnostic referral will need to be made available to each GP Practice, e.g. spirometry, echo cardiography, etc. CHO Specialist Nurse and allied health professional resources will also be required to support GPs in each locality. • Communications to the public and development of materials about the new programmes will be developed by the HSE.
Enabling Measures. Xxxxxx takes a pragmatic view of the opportunity offered to negotiate freedoms and flexibilities. The development process has identified a number of key enabling measures, which would benefit the LAA in its operation. These potential freedoms and flexibilities are summarised below: Children & Young People
Enabling Measures. The partnership is proposing to request a small number of enabling measures. Listed below are those freedoms and flexibilities which are being considered for negotiation with Government Departments and GOL. Sub-regional/district approach to accessing DWP/JCP+ to tackle local problems of worklessness DWP approaches, priorities and funding are generally set on a regional (pan- London) basis which does not take into account particular and specific local issues relating to worklessness. Flexibility to agree local joint commissioning/pooling of resources would enable a more coherent, strategically consistent approach to tackling worklessness, greater and more practical partnership working, would overcome any duplication of provision, and would ensure economy of scale, greater value for money and greater impact. We are requesting GOL broker this between Haringey and Department of Works and Pensions. Flexibility around benefits when people enter employment Losing their passport to vital benefits for new job entrants is a major barrier, particularly housing benefit. Losing such benefits often penalises people who take up or return to work. Some benefit claimants currently are able to claim benefit for 4 weeks after taking up employment, e.g. some New Deal claimants, but to extend this and other benefit support (including housing benefit) for all new job entrants to 13 weeks would remove a major barrier to work and would greatly increase the numbers able to take up and maintain sustained employment. Not agreeing this measure would fail to address a major obstacle to work for many people in Haringey and a vital underlining factor in worklessness. We will consider discussing this enabling measure in two parts, general benefits and housing benefits, as the latter is administered by the local authority. Flexibility around 16 hour rule for work placements and work trials In the SSCF programme we have recognised that the lack of experience, work discipline etc is a major barrier for many people wishing to take up work. Work is underway with major employers, including the local authority, to put in place an intervention that supports people who wish to gain experience and skills through work placements. An obstacle to undertaking meaningful work placements is the restriction around the “16 hour rule” which triggers a loss of benefit for volunteers and those on work placements. Currently people can undertake 3-week “work trials” with the agreement of JCP+, this allows them...

Related to Enabling Measures

  • Interim Measures 6.1 The Parties acknowledge that the British Columbia Claims Task Force made the following recommendation concerning interim measures:

  • Non-Conforming Measures 1. Articles 2, 3 and 6 shall not apply to:

  • Other Measures 1. A Contracting Party may not require that an enterprise of that Contracting Party that is an investment under this Agreement appoint to senior management positions individuals of any particular nationality.

  • General Measures (a) Evidence of family violence may be required and can be in the form an agreed document issued by the Police Service, a Court, a registered health practitioner, a Family Violence Support Service, district nurse, maternal and health care nurse or Lawyer. A signed statutory declaration can also be offered as evidence.

  • Safety Measures Awarded vendor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of employees on the worksite, and shall erect and properly maintain all necessary safeguards for protection of workers and the public. Awarded vendor shall post warning signs against all hazards created by the operation and work in progress. Proper precautions shall be taken pursuant to state law and standard practices to protect workers, general public and existing structures from injury or damage.

  • Provisional Measures Article 50

  • Protective Measures We have implemented and will maintain appropriate technical and organisational measures in relation to the Services taking into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation, and the nature, scope, context and purposes of Processing, as well as the likelihood and severity of risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects. This includes measures relating to the physical security of Our facilities used to deliver them, measures to control access rights to Our assets and relevant networks, and processes for testing these measures. In accordance with Our obligations under applicable law, We may undertake digital forensic investigations in relation to the use of the Services and Subscriptions. You are responsible for using, and ensuring that your Users use, the controls and advice provided by the Services correctly and consistently.

  • Anti-dumping and Countervailing Measures 1. Each Party retains its rights and obligations under Article VI of GATT 1994, the AD Agreement, and the SCM Agreement regarding the application of anti-dumping and countervailing measures. 2. During any anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigation involving the Parties, the Parties agree to exchange all notifications, exporter/producer questionnaires, and information requirements2 in English. 3. Should a Party decide to impose an anti-dumping or countervailing duty, the amount of such duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping or subsidies, and the investigating Party shall endeavor to apply a duty which is less than the margin of dumping or subsidies, if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry. 4. Upon receipt by a Party's competent investigating authority of a properly documented countervailing duty application with respect to imports from the other Party, and before initiating an investigation, the Party shall provide written notification to the other Party of its receipt of the application and afford the other Party a meeting to consult with its competent investigating authority regarding the application, as provided for in Article 13 of the SCM Agreement. 5. Where a Party's competent investigating authority conducts an anti-dumping or countervailing duty investigation with respect to imports from the other Party, in addition to the notifications in accordance with the relevant provisions of the AD Agreement and the SCM Agreement, and independently of the notifications provided directly to the producers or exporters, it shall provide to the other Party written notification of the initiation of such investigation procedure, together with a copy of the exporter/producer questionnaire and the list of the known main exporters or producers. 6. The Party that received the notification in accordance with paragraph 5: (a) shall endeavor to send the list of producers and exporters of the good under investigation to the competent investigating authority of the other Party, together with their addresses, within 30 days; 2 The parties concerned shall provide all documents and information required by the competent investigating authority through the exporter/producer questionnaires and information requirements in the competent investigating authority's official national language. The competent investigating authority shall accept translations of such documents and information, as long as the translator's identification and signature are included. (b) shall endeavor to inform the exporters or producers, or the relevant trade or industrial associations of the good under investigation, of the information received from the competent investigating authority of the other Party; and (c) may collect responses of the exporters or producers to the questionnaire and send the collected responses to the competent investigating authority of the other Party by the due date specified in the questionnaire.

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Safeguard Measures 1. The Parties note the multilateral negotiations pursuant to Article X of GATS on the question of emergency safeguard measures based on the principle of non- discrimination. Upon the conclusion of such multilateral negotiations, the Parties shall conduct a review for the purpose of discussing appropriate amendments to this Agreement so as to incorporate the results of such multilateral negotiations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!