Environmental Mitigation. Owner is responsible for wetlands mitigation required by Permits, Applicable Law or Governmental Instrumentalities to be performed on or off the Site. Subject to Applicable Law and Permits. It is anticipated that most such mitigation will take place after the majority of construction by the Contractor has been completed. Contractor shall cooperate to ensure the mitigation is accomplished expeditiously and with minimum interference.
Environmental Mitigation. Contractor shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures, if any, adopted by any public agency with respect to this Project pursuant to the environmental protections laws of the State of Oregon.
Environmental Mitigation. Owner is responsible for wetlands mitigation required by Permits, Applicable Law or Governmental Instrumentalities to be performed on the Phase 3 Site as defined in the Scoping Documents and Attachment 25 Exhibit 25-1, dredge site BUDM placement, and dredge pipeline right-of-way. Contractor will be responsible for wetland mitigation at offsite park and rides, offsite laydown yards, and offsite assembly areas as required by Contractor to perform the Work. Contractor, at its own cost, shall cooperate to allow the mitigation that is the responsibility of Owner to be accomplished expeditiously and with minimum interference.
Environmental Mitigation. CHSRA will fully implement the FRA-approved MMEP and any conditions of Federal and state environmental approvals and permits required for construction of the FCS. The CHSRA understands that FRA may withhold payment if FRA determines that the CHSRA (or its contractors) has failed to comply with the FRA-approved MMEP or the conditions of any Federal or state environmental permit.
Environmental Mitigation. In connection with City's approval of any Subsequent Approval or issuance of any other permit or approval that is subject to CEQA, and to the extent permitted or required by CEQA, City shall commence and process any and all preliminary reviews, initial studies and other assessments pursuant to CEQA, and City shall first consider using and adopting any existing environmental impact report(s) certified for the Project, addenda thereto and other existing environmental reports and studies as adequately addressing the environmental impacts of such matter or matters before requiring new or supplemental review or documentation.
Environmental Mitigation. ▪ To implement environmental mitigation measures in San Marcos as described in the Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Coffee Value Chain, RVCP worked with ANACAFE to organize 73 training events pertaining to climate change. A total of 1,342 coffee producers (985 men and 357 women) participated. As a result, 1,224 growers implemented environmental mitigation measures. A separate report provides further details on progress to implement the Plan. ▪ To implement environmental mitigation measures in Huehuetenango as described in the Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Coffee Value Chain, (see separate report) and PERSUAP, RVCP worked with ANACAFE as follows: − 20 training events for 496 participants (346 men and 150 women); − Classroom instruction and hands-on exercises to learn the use and safe handling of pesticides (included providing 50 sets of spray equipment and PPE to curb the spread of coffee rust disease); − Set up 120 biodeps for producer organizations; building on that success, growers used their own resources to set up an additional 20 biodeps; − Provide technical assistance to 50 coffee growers to maintain an equal number of absorption xxxxx used during harvest season. The xxxxx appropriately treat wastewater from wet mill processing and collect solids for composting or soil amendments. ▪ FEDECOCAGUA completed activities for environmental mitigation in compliance with the Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Plan for the Coffee Value Chain as approved by USAID for RVCP (see separate report). ▪ FEDECOAG: − Worked through its Centro de Generacion y Analisis para el Diseno y Apoyo Tecnico (CAAT in Spanish) to continue publishing news bulletins on climate conditions and provide producers with timely information to plan their production schedules. − Provide PPE for 550 producers from 22 RVCP organizations and provide training on the importance of using and maintaining the equipment to avoid health hazards when in contact with chemicals. − Set up six weather stations to a) continuously monitor atmospheric conditions that could affect crops such as potatoes, sweet peas, snow peas, lima beans and cruciferous vegetables; b) provide timely information for technicians and producers on weather conditions, and c) use newsletters and brochures to distribute information on climate. − Install 88 bins to collect used pesticide containers at the 22 RVCP horticulture organizations (four bins at each) and continue coordinating wit...
Environmental Mitigation. The parties understand that the EIR was intended to be used in connection with all of the Project Approvals needed for the Project.
Environmental Mitigation. The parties understand that the EIR for the Project is a project level CEQA document intended to be used in connection with each of the Project Approvals and Subsequent Approvals needed for the Project. Consistent with the CEQA policies and requirements applicable to the EIR, City agrees to use the EIR in connection with the processing of any Subsequent Approval to the extent allowed by law. City agrees not to impose on Developer any mitigation measures or other conditions of approval other than those specifically imposed by the Project Approvals and the Mitigation Monitoring Program described in the FEIR, specifically required by Applicable Law, or as properly required through the design or architecture review process as long as such mitigation measures or other conditions are imposed in a manner consistent with applicable design review guidelines.
Environmental Mitigation. The parties understand that the EIR was intended to be used in connection with each of the Project Approvals and Subsequent Approvals needed for the Project. Consistent with the CEQA policies and requirements applicable to the EIR, City agrees to use the EIR in connection with the processing of any Subsequent Approval to the maximum extent allowed by law and not to impose on the Project any mitigation measures or other conditions of approval other than those specifically imposed by the Project Approvals and the Mitigation Monitoring Program or specifically required by Applicable law. In addition, to the extent consistent with CEQA’s policies and requirements applicable to either Master EIRs or tiered EIRs, the City agrees to use the EIR in connection with the processing of approvals related to future expansion to the maximum extent allowed by law.
Environmental Mitigation. Prior to any building demolition, Developer will engage with a third-party company to provide an environmental assessment on the building and will pursue clearance from such company that the applicable building is safe to demolish before any demolition begins. Developer will also engage with a third-party company to monitor air quality and vibration monitoring throughout the demolition process and shall make reasonable efforts to reduce airborne particles, noise and vibration during demolition. Where possible, Developer shall make reasonable efforts to direct contractors to use noise mitigating scrubbers on construction equipment. X
