Evaluation and Selection Criteria. The City plans to select a consultant to perform the work described in the RFP to the consultant whose submittal is most advantageous to the City with factors including, but not limited to: the City’s evaluation of the consultant’s final product in similar utility infrastructure permitting and designs, previous client’s satisfaction with the final product, proposed timeliness of delivery of the final product, general understanding of the City’s needs, as expressed in the consultant’s written response to this RFP, reference calls and/or recommendations, and any additional criteria deemed appropriate by the City which would lend itself to establishing the consultant’s ability to perform the work as outlined in this RFP. <.. image(A map of a city Description automatically generated with low confidence) removed ..> <.. image(An aerial view of a city Description automatically generated with medium confidence) removed ..> CITY OF PACIFIC THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Pacific, Washington, a municipal corporation (“City”), and _, (“Consultant”), whose principal office is located at
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. The Town follows Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS) approach to consultant selection. The consultants that are deemed to most fully meet the following criteria will be asked to negotiate a scope and fee for a Master Professional Services Agreement (MPSA). Qualifications will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria: • Firm’s experience of the services required, including unique and direct knowledge of the Town’s water, recycled water, collections, and/or wastewater systems. • Responsiveness to this RFQ. • Experience and qualifications of the firm’s project managers, team leaders, other essential personnel assigned to the Town’s on-call engineering work. • Approach to providing services. • Information obtained from references. Based on evaluation of the qualifications and the Town’s needs, the Town may select one or more consultant(s) and enter into negotiations for a Master Professional Services Agreement (MPSA) based on a specialty area of expertise or experience. When an assignment is identified, the Town will i) select a firm with an executed MPSA and negotiate a specific scope of work and fee under a separate Task Order to the MPSA; or ii) request a proposal (RFP) of one or more firms with an executed MPSA and award the work and Task Order to the most qualified firm, for work that is estimated at greater than $50,000.
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. Minimum Qualifications
1. Possess at least two (2) years of demonstrated experience providing programming to support the transition of youth and young adults to adulthood and independent living.
2. Possess at least two (2) years of direct experience working collaboratively with a public agency, such as child welfare, as well as other community based organizations that provide services to the targeted population.
3. Possess all necessary licenses, permits, approvals and authorizations necessary in order to perform the Work and conduct the vendor’s business, including Department of Justice and Child Abuse Centralized Index clearance for staff.
4. Demonstrate the willingness and ability to comply with City contracting requirements set forth in Section VII of this RFP.
5. Be a current certified vendor or possess the willingness and ability to become a certified vendor with the City and County of San Francisco within ten days of notice of award. Please note: Agencies submitting proposals that have previously been contracted by the City and County of San Francisco and/ or Federal agencies to provide goods and/or services must successfully demonstrate compliance with performance/monitoring requirements specified in previous grants/contracts (corrective actions) in order to be considered responsive to this RFP. Documented failure to correct performance/monitoring deficiencies identified in past City, County or Federal grants/contracts may result in Agency disqualification to participate in this RFP. The proposals will be evaluated by a selection committee comprised of parties with expertise in the service areas identified in this RFP. The City intends to evaluate the proposals generally in accordance with the criteria itemized below.
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. A. Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. The City plans to select a consultant to perform the work described in the RFP to the consultant whose submittal is most advantageous to the City with factors including, but not limited to: the City’s evaluation of the consultant’s final product in similar utility infrastructure permitting and designs, previous client’s satisfaction with the final product, proposed timeliness of delivery of the final product, general understanding of the City’s needs, as expressed in the consultant’s written response to this RFP, reference calls and/or recommendations, and any additional criteria deemed appropriate by the City which would lend itself to establishing the consultant’s ability to perform the work as outlined in this RFP. CITY OF PACIFIC THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Pacific, Washington, a municipal corporation (“City”), and _, (“Consultant”), whose principal office is located at
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. The Village of Keremeos will do an initial evaluation of the proposals using the criteria and weightings in the table below. The Village may then hold interviews with short listed Proponents or make a recommendation to the Mayor and Council to award to a Proponent. Proponent’s experience/ability to comply with all identified requirements within the Scope of Work 20 Availability of staff assigned to Keremeos and location of office(s) 20 Keremeos deemed value for proposed fees 20 Proponent’s knowledge of/experience with Keremeos 10 Value adds 10 References and reputation of the Proponent 10 Proposed methodology for managing budgets and charging out time on projects and requests (including sub-consultants) 5 Quality of the Proposal (clear, complete, demonstrates understanding of Keremeos) 5 Submission of a proposal in response to this Request for Proposal indicates acceptance of the following terms and conditions, which will apply to this Request for Proposal and to any subsequent Contract.
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. The Town follows Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS) approach to consultant selection. The consultants that are deemed to most fully meet the following criteria, will be asked to negotiate a scope and fee for a Master Professional Services Agreement (MPSA). Qualifications will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria: Firm’s experience of the services required, including unique and direct knowledge of the Town’s water, recycled water, collections, and/or wastewater systems. Completeness of submittal Experience and qualifications of the firm’s project managers, team leaders, other essential personnel assigned to the Town’s work. Demonstrated ability to perform some portion of the work described in Section 2. Approach to providing services. Information obtained from references. Based on evaluation of the qualifications and the Town’s needs, the Town may select one or more consultant(s) and enter into negotiations for a Master Professional Services Agreement (MPSA) based on a specialty area of expertise or experience. When an assignment is identified, the Town will i) select a firm with an executed MPSA and negotiate a specific scope of work and fee under a separate Task Order to the MPSA; or ii) request a proposal (RFP) of one or more firms with and enter into a separate Professional Service Agreement (PSA) for specific projects. The Town will keep the SOQs on file for a period of five years and may discuss issuing an MPSA to a particular consultant on an as-needed project basis based on the particulars of the project and unique qualifications of the consultant team. The Town of Windsor does not guarantee work to any qualified firm. Rates and costs are not part of the qualification evaluation. Rates and costs requested in Section 3 will be considered only for purposes of negotiating and determining costs for Task Orders.
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. The City recognizes the long-term implications of implementing a RF AMR System. The City, therefore, will evaluate each Proposal based on long-term cost effectiveness, initial cost, future maintenance, and similar system characteristics. The City Selection Team will consider, at a minimum, the following criterion in evaluating Proposals:
Evaluation and Selection Criteria. This section describes the process for analyzing and evaluating the Proposals. SFPUC and Contract Monitoring Division (CMD) staff first performs an Initial Screening process as described in Section VI.1. Proposals that pass the Initial Screening process will proceed to the Evaluation Process described in Section VI.2.
Evaluation and Selection Criteria
