EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS a. The State will put each bid through a process of evaluation to determine the responsiveness of bidders to the State's needs. The final selection will be made on the basis of the lowest responsible bid meeting the specifications.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents‘ submittals. Top-scoring Respondents will be invited to participate in Stage 2 of the evaluation process, which will be a formal presentation to the evaluation committee. (See Section 3.16) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non- responsive. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent‘s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this RFP document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table below for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent‘s ranking: Evaluation Category Maximum Possible Pts. Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail Xxxxxxx 0 XXX 0000 Xxxxx/Xxxxxxxx Section 3 – Financials 24 Section 4 – PUR 1000 Agree/Disagree Section 5 – References, Purchase Orders, & Environmental 49 Section 6 – Technical Specifications 145 Section 7 – Pricing Models and discounts proposed 260 Section 7 – Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire Pass/Fail Questions to Vendors 320 Total Points Possible: 798 pts. Except for Cost Information, all evaluation categories will be scored with each response having the opportunity to achieve the maximum total point allocation indicated.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. The qualifications-based selection process is used to select consultants for master on- call agreements. Generally, the following information and criteria are used to evaluate and rank the responses to the RFQ:
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. A detailed evaluation of the proposals will be conducted and the proposals will be ranked. A comparative description of the proposals and evaluation results will be prepared. The evaluation and recommendation will be presented to City Council. The City Council will review the recommendation and approve that recommendation or form an alternative recommendation.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents’ submittals. Top-scoring Respondents will be invited to negotiate their offerings and proposed pricing. (See Section 3.13 of this ITN.) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non-responsive by the Department, at its discretion. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent’s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this ITN document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table, below, for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent’s ranking: Evaluation Category Maximum Possible Pts. Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. 2.5.1 Contract Award Contract award, if made, will be in accordance with RFP Section 9: Evaluation to responsive and responsible Proposer(s). Notice of Award, if made, will occur pursuant to Section 1.9, Key Action Dates. However, the Lead State, at its sole option, may change the Notice of Intent to Award date without prior notification. The Lead State reserves the right to modify or cancel in whole or in part its RFP document.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. Contractors who possess the capabilities and conform to the solicitation requirements will be placed on the Approved Vendor List for Uniform Laundry Rental and Related Services. However, regardless of rates proposed, the City of Xxxxxx Grande reserves the right to select other than the lowest price proposal and will also utilize but not be limited to the City of Xxxxxx Grande Municipal Code, Chapter 3.08, Section 3.08.020(G), Guidelines for Evaluating Bids; and Section 3.2 of this RFP (Selection Criteria and Consideration).
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. Evaluation Proposal evaluation involves an assessment of both the quality and responsiveness of the proposals and the ability of the firm to fulfill the requirements of the RFP. The proposals will be evaluated to ensure that all material requirements of the RFP are met. Selection Process The awarded firm will be selected from the qualified vendors submitting responses to this RFP. The selection process will be as follows:
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS: Based on the proposal format as outlined in Section II, the evaluation criteria in order of importance are as follows: (100)
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. Proposals will be evaluated by a committee and will be ranked in accordance with the RFP section entitled “Evaluation Criteria” by a selection committee (which committee shall be comprised of such persons as City may determine in its sole discretion).
