The Evaluation Committee Clause Samples
The Evaluation Committee clause establishes a designated group responsible for reviewing and assessing proposals, bids, or applications within a contractual or procurement process. Typically, this committee is composed of individuals with relevant expertise who evaluate submissions based on predetermined criteria, ensuring a fair and objective selection process. The core function of this clause is to formalize the evaluation process, promote transparency, and mitigate potential conflicts of interest by clearly defining who is responsible for making key decisions.
The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post- Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five work days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate.
1) The Faculty chair will serve on area evaluations and facilitate the Pre-Observation Meeting. In the event that a faculty chair cannot serve, an area does not have a chair, or the faculty chair is the evaluee, the Educational Administrator will meet with the faculty in the area to select a suitable substitute.
2) Faculty Evaluators will participate in all components of the evaluation as peer experts: • Attend all committee meetings • Review the portfolio and other materials • Make arrangements for an observation date • Complete the observation and observation form appropriate to assignment • Complete Form B/FT as appropriate • Give the evaluee timely feedback upon completion of the observation (prior to the post-observation meeting) • Sign the final report confirming the majority opinion
3) The Educational Administrator: • Provides direction to evaluee on expectations and suitability of initial paperwork • Provides direction to evaluee on expectations and initial process • Determines the timeline following contract specifications • Coordinates the paperwork inherent in the process • Completes an observation and observation form appropriate ...
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee for the second-year probationary faculty member will be the same as that for the first year. The Evaluation Committee Chair will convene committee meetings and maintain the Evaluation File and Evaluation Committee minutes. Should a vacancy occur on the committee for any reason, the Committee Chair will fill the vacancy using the procedure described in section I.A. above no later than the third week of the second Fall Semester of employment. All decisions and recommendations of the Evaluation Committee require the affirmative vote of three members, except for a Recommendation to Employ the Probationary Employee as a Tenured Employee for all Subsequent Academic Years or a Recommendation to Not Enter into a Contract for the Following Academic Year which require the affirmative vote of four members. If the Evaluation Committee is unable to make a decision or recommendation, the Superintendent/President and the president of the Academic Senate will confer and make the decision or recommendation.
The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee Article 6 (continued) members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post-Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five working days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate.
1) The faculty chair will serve on area evaluations and facilitate the Pre-Observation Meeting. In the event that a faculty chair cannot serve, an area does not have a chair, or the faculty chair is the evaluee, the Educational Administrator will meet with the faculty in the area to select a suitable substitute.
2) Faculty Evaluators will participate in all components of the evaluation as peer experts:
3) The Educational Administrator:
The Evaluation Committee. This procedure shall be the official evaluation procedure and shall be reviewed annually by the Employee Performance Evaluation Committee (EPEC). The Committee is comprised of bargaining unit members and administrators. The EPEC has the authority to meet annually prior to the opening day to review and make any changes to the District’s Evaluation Procedures. The Administration will then annually provide to the staff a copy of the Evaluation Procedures which outlines procedures and timelines for evaluations.
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of two of the following three people: The Evaluation Committee shall send a letter to each Faculty Member named in the report from the Developmental Review Committee as needing performance development or improvement. This letter shall identify those areas of performance requiring development or improvement and shall schedule a meeting with the Evaluation Committee in order to work out a strategy which effectively responds to the performance issues indicated. The chairperson of the Evaluation Committee, or designate, shall meet with each Faculty Member named in the report as needing performance development or improvement, and, in consultation with the Faculty Member, shall devise a plan to address the areas of concern which may stipulate a specific term and/or time frame for improvement. The Faculty Member shall be provided with a summary of the meeting and the strategy for improvement, with the time frame for resolution. A copy of the summary shall be forwarded to the Faculty Association. The Evaluation Committee, or its designate, shall reconvene with the Faculty Member at the end of the stipulated period described above, to discuss the progress and outcome regarding the plan. Based on this review, the committee shall then notify the Faculty Member, in writing, with a copy to the Faculty Association, that: When a disagreement arises concerning the nature or existence of a problem, the Faculty Member may write a letter of dissension and submit affidavits and testimony contrary to any finding of the Evaluation Committee, or of the Developmental Review Committee, and request inclusion of same in his/her personnel file.
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of two of the following three people:
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of two of the following three people: the President; the Vice-President Academic (chairperson); the Faculty ▇▇▇▇ of the faculty member being evaluated; additional members may be included, at the discretion of the Committee, when added expertise is required.
The Evaluation Committee. 1. Substantive changes to the Teacher Evaluation System Procedures Manual (Evaluation Manual) shall reflect new contractual language agreements in this article. The Evaluation Committee is charged with aligning those contractual language changes to the Teacher Evaluation System Procedures Manual (Evaluation Manual).
2. The Evaluation Committee shall also provide oversight of all planning development and implementation of the Evaluation Process creating and overseeing a system to ensure reliability and validity of observations and all evaluations are conducted by trained personnel.
3. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of three members selected by the Union and three members selected by the District. The Committee shall meet as needed to develop the Evaluation Manual, which the Parties agree is binding as to teacher evaluations to the extent not inconsistent with this Article.
4. The Evaluation committee is authorized to make decisions to make substantive changes to the Evaluation Manual,
a. Provided two-thirds of the committee members agree to the recommendations, they shall be made directly to the Superintendent to present to the School Board which shall either accept the recommendations or refer them back to the committee; if less than this fraction of the committee members agree, the results of the committee’s work shall be submitted to the parties’ negotiations teams for resolution during subsequent bargaining.