The Evaluation Committee Sample Clauses

The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of two of the following three people: • the President; • the Vice-President Academic (chairperson); • the Faculty Xxxx of the faculty member being evaluated; • additional members may be included, at the discretion of the Committee, when added expertise is required. The Evaluation Committee shall send a letter to each faculty member referred to the Committee as needing performance improvement. This letter shall identify those areas of performance requiring improvement and shall schedule a meeting with the Evaluation Committee in order to work out a strategy which effectively responds to the performance issues indicated. The Chairperson of the Evaluation Committee, or designate, shall meet with each faculty member referred to the Committee, and, in consultation with the faculty member, shall devise a plan to address the areas of concern which may stipulate a specific term and/or time frame for improvement. The faculty member shall be provided with a summary of the meeting and the strategy for improvement, with the time frame for resolution. A copy of the summary shall be forwarded to the Faculty Association. The Evaluation Committee, or its designate, shall reconvene with the faculty member at the end of the stipulated period described above, to discuss the progress and outcome regarding the plan. Based on this review, the Committee shall then notify the faculty member, in writing, with a copy to the Faculty Association, that: • the faculty member has satisfied the stated criteria for improvement; • the faculty member has failed to show the required level of improvement, and further improvement is required; • if a Probationary faculty member, and they have not satisfied the criteria for improvement, the faculty member’s employment will not be continued. When a disagreement arises concerning the nature or existence of a problem, the faculty member may write a letter of dissension and submit affidavits and testimony contrary to any finding of the Evaluation Committee, or of the Developmental Review Committee, and request inclusion of same in their personnel file.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee for the second-year probationary faculty member will be the same as that for the first year. The Evaluation Committee Chair will convene committee meetings and maintain the Evaluation File and Evaluation Committee minutes. Should a vacancy occur on the committee for any reason, the Committee Chair will fill the vacancy using the procedure described in section I.A. above no later than the third week of the second Fall Semester of employment. All decisions and recommendations of the Evaluation Committee require the affirmative vote of three members, except for a Recommendation to Employ the Probationary Employee as a Tenured Employee for all Subsequent Academic Years or a Recommendation to Not Enter into a Contract for the Following Academic Year which require the affirmative vote of four members. If the Evaluation Committee is unable to make a decision or recommendation, the Superintendent/President and the president of the Academic Senate will confer and make the decision or recommendation.
The Evaluation Committee. The goal of the Evaluation Committee is to identify and validate strengths, to identify areas needing improvement, and to suggest areas for growth. The committee should limit itself to the agreed-upon expectations for conditions of improvement and parameters that the faculty member and department have identified. During the evaluation cycle, the Educational Administrator and the Evaluation Committee Article 6 (continued) members shall make scheduled and announced visits to classes or work areas for observation purposes. The Evaluation Committee will meet with the faculty member in the Pre-Observation and Post-Observation Meetings and sign the final evaluation report. Every effort will be made for evaluation meetings to be scheduled with due consideration of faculty assignments. In the event that a committee member misses a meeting, that committee member will meet with both the Educational Administrator and the evaluation committee chair, within five working days, to fulfill committee obligations. A minority statement may be submitted to the evaluation package prior to the report being finalized and signed. All comments and recommendations will be tied to components relevant to the faculty member’s job description. Personal criticisms, challenges to academic freedom, and identification of goals outside of these parameters are not appropriate. 1) The faculty chair will serve on area evaluations and facilitate the Pre-Observation Meeting. In the event that a faculty chair cannot serve, an area does not have a chair, or the faculty chair is the evaluee, the Educational Administrator will meet with the faculty in the area to select a suitable substitute. 2) Faculty Evaluators will participate in all components of the evaluation as peer experts: 3) The Educational Administrator:
The Evaluation Committee. This procedure shall be the official evaluation procedure and shall be reviewed annually by the Employee Performance Evaluation Committee (EPEC). The Committee is comprised of bargaining unit members and administrators. The EPEC has the authority to meet annually prior to the opening day to review and make any changes to the District’s Evaluation Procedures. The Administration will then annually provide to the staff a copy of the Evaluation Procedures which outlines procedures and timelines for evaluations.
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of two of the following three people:
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of two of the following three people: The Evaluation Committee shall send a letter to each Faculty Member named in the report from the Developmental Review Committee as needing performance development or improvement. This letter shall identify those areas of performance requiring development or improvement and shall schedule a meeting with the Evaluation Committee in order to work out a strategy which effectively responds to the performance issues indicated. The chairperson of the Evaluation Committee, or designate, shall meet with each Faculty Member named in the report as needing performance development or improvement, and, in consultation with the Faculty Member, shall devise a plan to address the areas of concern which may stipulate a specific term and/or time frame for improvement. The Faculty Member shall be provided with a summary of the meeting and the strategy for improvement, with the time frame for resolution. A copy of the summary shall be forwarded to the Faculty Association. The Evaluation Committee, or its designate, shall reconvene with the Faculty Member at the end of the stipulated period described above, to discuss the progress and outcome regarding the plan. Based on this review, the committee shall then notify the Faculty Member, in writing, with a copy to the Faculty Association, that: When a disagreement arises concerning the nature or existence of a problem, the Faculty Member may write a letter of dissension and submit affidavits and testimony contrary to any finding of the Evaluation Committee, or of the Developmental Review Committee, and request inclusion of same in his/her personnel file.
The Evaluation Committee. 1. Substantive changes to the Teacher Evaluation System Procedures Manual (Evaluation Manual) shall reflect new contractual language agreements in this article. The Evaluation Committee is charged with aligning those contractual language changes to the Teacher Evaluation System Procedures Manual (Evaluation Manual). 2. The Evaluation Committee shall also provide oversight of all planning development and implementation of the Evaluation Process creating and overseeing a system to ensure reliability and validity of observations and all evaluations are conducted by trained personnel. 3. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of three members selected by the Union and three members selected by the District. The Committee shall meet as needed to develop the Evaluation Manual, which the Parties agree is binding as to teacher evaluations to the extent not inconsistent with this Article. 4. The Evaluation committee is authorized to make decisions to make substantive changes to the Evaluation Manual, a. Provided two-thirds of the committee members agree to the recommendations, they shall be made directly to the Superintendent to present to the School Board which shall either accept the recommendations or refer them back to the committee; if less than this fraction of the committee members agree, the results of the committee’s work shall be submitted to the parties’ negotiations teams for resolution during subsequent bargaining.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of two of the following three people:  the President;  the Vice-President Academic (chairperson);  the Faculty Xxxx of the faculty member being evaluated;  additional members may be included, at the discretion of the Committee, when added expertise is required.

Related to The Evaluation Committee

  • Evaluation Committee 16.2.1 The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Development Committee for the purpose of regularly reviewing the effectiveness of the policy, procedure and process, including the evaluation instrument, for the evaluation of teachers in the District and to provide recommendations to the Superintendent and Board by April 30.

  • Selection Committee A. Each building site will appoint a selection committee for the TLS. The committee shall be comprised of equal numbers of teachers and administrators and at least one teacher will be appointed by the Des Moines Education Association. B. The committee will accept and review application for a TLS position and will make recommendations to the hiring administrator. In developing recommendations, the committee will utilize measures of teacher effectiveness and professional growth, consider the needs of the school district and review the performance and professional development of the applicants. Teachers who are selected must meet all of the qualification contained in the TLS grant and contained in the law.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements: (i) Written guidelines that establish the formation and composition of the Advisory Committee, terms of service for members, contingency for removal or resignation of members, a schedule of meetings, and any other administrative details; (ii) Composition that includes at least an equal number of local representatives as state representatives; (iii) A process for receiving input from Subdivisions and other communities regarding how the opioid crisis is affecting their communities, their abatement needs, and proposals for abatement strategies and responses; and (iv) A process by which Advisory Committee recommendations for expenditures for Opioid Remediation will be made to and considered by the appropriate state agencies.

  • Negotiation Committee (A) The Union may designate certain employees to serve on its Negotiation Committee, and such employees will be granted administrative leave to attend negotiating sessions with the state. No employee shall be credited with more than the number of hours in the employee's regular workday for any day the employee is in negotiations. The agency shall not reimburse employees for travel, meals, lodging, or any expense incurred in connection with attendance at negotiating sessions. (B) No more than one employee shall be selected from the same work unit at any one time, nor shall the selection of an employee unduly hamper the operations of the work unit.

  • Union Committee ‌ The Union shall appoint and maintain a Committee comprising persons who are employees of the Employer, and/or the Senior Union Official, or her/his representative, which shall be known as the Union Committee. The Union at all times shall keep the Employer informed of the individual membership of the Committee.

  • Grievance Committee The Hospital will recognize a Grievance Committee composed of the Chief Xxxxxxx and not more than (as set out in Local Provisions Appendix) employees selected by the Union who have completed their probationary period. A general representative of the Union may be present at any meeting of the Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to deal with complaints or grievances as set out in this Collective Agreement. The Union shall keep the Hospital notified in writing of the names of the members of the Grievance Committee appointed or selected under this Article as well as the effective date of their respective appointments. A Committee member shall suffer no loss of earnings for time spent during their regular scheduled working hours in attending grievance meetings with the Hospital up to, but not including arbitration. The number of employees on the Grievance Committee shall be determined locally.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!