PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION Sample Clauses

PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION. As part of its strategy to meet these provisions of this RFP, the Provider may elect to provide a percentage (specify) of overage or surplus stock of equipment within schools or other depot sites, or insure against all other risks of loss or damage through some other means such as commercial insurance. Regardless of the method proposed by the Bidder, the Bidder will describe how it has integrated its protection plan into its overall support plans. All costs associated with the Provider's proposed protection plan shall be counted as part of its bid price and should be incorporated into the Bidder's annual cost proposal defined in PART V PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION. Bidders should recognize that this enhanced protection only needs to provide protection against categories of loss or damage that are not covered in Section 9.5.2.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION. 9.1 The City of New Westminster will evaluate all submitted valid Proposals. Any or all proposals will not necessarily be accepted. The City will disqualify Proponent(s) that fail to meet a minimum requirement for qualifications, experience, and methodology from the process prior to cost considerations. The object of the evaluation and selection process is to identify the Proposal that, in the City’s opinion offers the best value for the products and/or services requested.
Sample 1Sample 2
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION. Evaluation of the submitted proposals shall be accomplished as follows: Evaluation Process - General Information
Sample 1
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION. A. Evaluation of the technical proposals determined to be responsive to the submittal requirements will be conducted by an evaluation committee in accordance to the procedures incorporated within enclosed Schedule B. EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT (Percent) 1. Performance of the firm with previous clients, on similar projects based upon quality of the work, control of costs, ability to meet schedules or deadlines and responsiveness to the client. 35%
Sample 1
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION. Each proposal will be reviewed to determine if it meets the minimum proposal requirements stipulated in Sections V and VI. Failure to meet the requirements of the RFP will be cause for HCAOG to reject the proposal. HCAOG may reject any proposal if it is conditional, incomplete, or contains irregularities. HCAOG may waive an immaterial deviation in a proposal. Waiver of an immaterial deviation shall in no way modify the RFP documents or excuse the respondent from full compliance with the contract requirements if the respondent is awarded the contract. Respondents may be telephoned and asked for further information, if necessary, and may be expected to appear for oral interviews. A selection committee will review all proposals and will make recommendations to the HCAOG Executive Director on the basis of the proposal, oral interview (if applicable), and references check. HCAOG reserves the right to select a consultant based solely on written proposals and not convene oral interviews. Proposals that meet the minimum qualifications will be evaluated and scored according to the criteria designed to help judge the quality of the proposal. Evaluation criteria will include such considerations as described below. Criteria Max Points Weight (Criterion weight)
Sample 1
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION. Evaluation of the submitted proposals shall be accomplished as follows: Evaluation Process - General Information An evaluation team, comprised of qualified reviewers, will judge the merits of the proposals received in accordance with the criteria defined in the RFP, and in accordance with the most advantageous financial and economic impact considerations (where applicable) for the State. Officials responsible for making decisions on the selection of a contractor shall ensure that the selection process accords equal opportunity and appropriate consideration to all who are capable of meeting the specifications. The goals of the evaluation process are to ensure fairness and objectivity in review of the proposals and to ensure that the contract is awarded to the Bidder whose proposal provides the best value to the State of Maine. The Department reserves the right to communicate and/or schedule interviews/presentations with Bidders if needed to obtain clarification of information contained in the proposals received, and the Department may revise the scores assigned in the initial evaluation to reflect those communications and/or interviews/presentations. Interviews/presentations are not required, and changes to proposals will not be permitted during any interview/presentation process. Therefore, Bidders should submit proposals that present their rates and other requested information as clearly and completely as possible. Scoring Weights and Process
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • Formal Evaluations The employer shall undertake formal evaluations of an employee’s performance of the various duties and responsibilities of a position only if one or more of the following conditions is present: • employee request • mutual agreement of hiring unit and employee • recommendation arising from informal evaluation • decision of Chair, Xxxx, Director or designate resulting from the processing of a complaint in accordance with Article 8.

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!