Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty. All full-status full-time faculty members shall be subject to formal evaluation once every four (4) years, utilizing the tools and procedures outlined in the Xxxxxxxxxxx College Faculty Evaluation Handbook. The evaluation process is to be non-punitive, promoting growth and opportunities for professional development. 1. One IDEA survey will be distributed to students in the semester prior to the checkpoint review meeting following the same process used in the evaluation process. 2. The Faculty will have sole possession of their detailed data, which includes the data cover sheets. The faculty member will provide a copy of their review process student data cover sheets to their immediate supervisor. 3. The IDEA results will not be tied to the evaluation score system. 4. The purpose of the checkpoint review meeting will be to have dialogue between the faculty member and the designated administrator regarding student data results, professional development activities and continuous improvement objectives. The faculty will bring with them, for the purpose of review and discussion, both the IDEA student data and their proposed professional development activities for the coming semesters. 5. In lieu of a face to face meeting, exceptional circumstances (i.e. faculty member is out of state, faculty member has other full time employment) may dictate the use of an alternative meeting format (i.e. phone or Internet meeting). 6. The administration will develop a standardized form to be utilized for recording professional development plans.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty. All full-status full-time faculty members shall be subject to formal evaluation once every four (4) years, utilizing the tools and procedures outlined in the Xxxxxxxxxxx College Faculty Evaluation Handbook. The evaluation process is to be non-punitive, promoting growth and opportunities for professional development. Where an evaluation results in an overall composite rating (OCR) score of less than 3.88, deficiencies must be stated in writing along with a plan for improvement formulated by the faculty member in consultation with the assigned faculty mentor and the designated administrator. The faculty mentor is assigned by the Designated Administrator for a period of two years. The faculty mentor will be compensated at a rate of one (1) contact hour per year. Evaluations will continue every two years until the OCR score is 3.88 or greater, at which time the regular evaluation cycle resumes. If the OCR score is less than 3.88 after mentoring occurs, faculty will be subject to the formal evaluation process outlined in the Faculty Evaluation Handbook every two years until such time as the OCR score rises to 3.88 or greater. Faculty mentor support will be provided for one (1) two-year period. If evaluation results in an OCR score of 4.50 or greater, the faculty member will receive recognition from the College for their achievement. In addition, all full status full-time faculty will have a checkpoint review meeting in the middle of the four year evaluation cycle (defined as two years after the last evaluation). The checkpoint review process is as follows: A . One IDEA survey will be distributed to students in the semester prior to the checkpoint review meeting following the same process used in the evaluation process.‌ B . The Faculty will have sole possession of their detailed data, which includes the data cover sheets. The faculty mem- ber will provide a copy of their review process student data cover sheets to their designated administrator.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty. All full-status full-time faculty members shall be subject to formal evaluation once every five (5) years, utilizing the tools and procedures outlined in the Xxxxxxxxxxx College Faculty Evaluation Handbook. The evaluation process is to be non-punitive, promoting growth and opportunities for professional development.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty

  • Full-Time Status In addition to the duties and responsibilities specifically assigned to the Executive pursuant to Section 2.1 hereof, the Executive shall: (a) devote substantially all of Executive’s time, energy and skill during regular business hours to the performance of the duties of his employment (reasonable vacations and reasonable absences due to illness excepted) and faithfully perform such duties; (b) diligently follow and implement all reasonable and lawful management policies and decisions communicated to Executive by the Board of Directors of the Employer; and (c) timely prepare and forward to the Board of Directors of the Employer all reports and accountings as may reasonably be requested of the Executive.

  • Full-Time Nurse is a Nurse who is hired to a position on a regular or temporary basis to work the work period described in Article 7.00 of this Agreement.

  • Full-Time Union or Public Duties The Employer shall grant, on written request, leave of absence without pay: (a) for employees to seek election in a municipal, provincial, or federal election, for a maximum period of ninety (90) days; (b) for employees selected for a full-time position with the Union or any body to which the Union is affiliated for a period of one (1) year; (c) for employees elected to a public office for a maximum period of five (5) years; (d) for an employee elected to the position of President or Secretary-Treasurer of the

  • Contractor Status The Contractor, under the code of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), is an independent contractor, and neither the Contractor's employees nor contract personnel are, or shall be deemed, the Client's employees.

  • Independent Contractor Status The Sub-Adviser shall for all purposes hereof be deemed to be an independent contractor and shall, unless otherwise provided or authorized, have no authority to act for or represent the Trust or the Adviser in any way or otherwise be deemed an agent of the Fund or the Adviser.

  • Professional Status The Superintendent affirms that he is not under contract with any other board of education covering any part or all of the term provided in this contract. Throughout the contract term, he will hold a valid and appropriate certificate to act as a superintendent of schools in the State of Nebraska which he will register and maintain on file in the school district’s central administrative office. This contract shall not be valid and the Board will not compensate the Superintendent for any service performed prior to the date that he registers his certificate.

  • CERTIFICATION PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FIREARM AND AMMUNITION INDUSTRIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has at least ten (10) full-time employees; (c) this contract has a value of at least $100,000 that is paid wholly or partly from public funds; (d) the contract is not excepted under Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.003 of SB 19 (87th leg.); and (e) governmental entity has determined that company is not a sole-source provider or governmental entity has not received any bids from a company that is able to provide this written verification, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 19 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary parent company, or affiliate of these entities or associations, that exists to make a profit, does not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate during the term of this contract against a firearm entity or firearm trade association. For purposes of this contract, “discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” shall mean, with respect to the entity or association, to: “ (1) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; (2) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; or (3) terminate an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19. “Discrimination against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” does not include: “ (1) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories; and (2) a company’s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency, or for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity’s or association’s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19.

  • Deviation from Grievance Procedure The Employer agrees that, after a grievance has been discussed at Step 2 of the grievance procedure the Employer or his representatives shall not initiate any discussion or negotiations with respect to the grievance, either directly or indirectly with the aggrieved employee without the consent of the xxxxxxx or the Union.

  • Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion First Tier Participants: a. The prospective first tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (1) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (2) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (3) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(2) of this certification; and (4) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. b. Where the prospective participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

  • More Time Needed If the Engineer determines or reasonably anticipates that the work authorized in a work authorization cannot be completed before the specified completion date, the Engineer shall promptly notify the State. The State may, at its sole discretion, extend the work authorization period by execution of supplemental authorization, using the form attached hereto as Attachment D. F-2. Changes in Scope. Changes that would modify the scope of the work authorized in a work authorization must be enacted by a written supplemental work authorization. The Engineer must allow adequate time for the State to review and approve any request for a time extension prior to expiration of the work authorization. If the change in scope affects the amount payable under the work authorization, the Engineer shall prepare a revised work authorization budget for the State's approval.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!