Evaluation of Historic Properties Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Historic Properties. For each property that is identified within the APE as affected by any activity described as part of Stipulation I.A, the BLM, in consultation with the Consulting Parties, will determine NRHP eligibility pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(c)(1). These may include properties of religious and cultural significance to Tribes or Tribal Organizations
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Historic Properties. 1.1 General Guidance Region 5 shall use the National Register criteria (36 CFR 60.4) when making determinations of eligibility; and/or Region 5 evaluation strategies for specific types of cultural resources, or Forest procedures that are or have been approved by the SHPO (Stipulation 7.7). Region 5 may use NRHP evaluation procedures documented in thematic studies or cultural resource modules previously approved by the California SHPO as individual evaluation and management programs or under prior programmatic agreements. These thematic studies or modules shall be supplemented as necessary to include any additional resources not previously considered. These thematic studies and modules also may be used in Nevada if approved by the Nevada SHPO. Such studies and modules are adopted herein by reference or may be amended to this agreement pursuant to Stipulation 12.1.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Evaluation of Historic Properties. The Heritage Professional may determine a reevaluation is necessary if, for example, new information about the property becomes available.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Evaluation of Historic Properties. To the maximum extent feasible, all cultural resources identified within an APE for an Undertaking covered by this Agreement shall be evaluated using the National Register Criteria for Xxxxxxxxxx [00 XXX Part 60.4], BLM Manual 8110 Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Resources, BLM Manual 8140 Protecting Cultural Resources, the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation [48 Fed. Reg. 447816], and appropriate National Register Bulletins (NRB) (for example NRB 15, 30 and 38.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. A. Arizona BLM will ensure all historic properties identified within the APE, and that have not been previously evaluated for National Register eligibility or for which updated evaluations are deemed necessary, are evaluated using the National Register Criteria for Xxxxxxxxxx [00 XXX Part 60.4], BLM Manual 8110, Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Resources, BLM Manual 8140, Protecting Cultural Resources, the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation [48 Fed. Reg. 447816], and National Register Bulletin 15.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. A. The historic properties identified as of October 1, 2020, are listed in Appendix B of this Agreement. In total, 644 archaeological sites have been recorded within the Oak Flat Federal Parcel (selected lands), GPO project areas, and the proposed tailings location for Alternatives 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Of these, 506 sites have been determined eligible for the NRHP, and 116 sites have been determined not eligible for the NRHP. Another 21 sites are unevaluated for NRHP eligibility. One site is exempt from Section 106 consultation because they are in-use gas pipelines, per the ACHP’s Exemption Regarding Historic Preservation Review Process for Projects Involving Natural Gas Pipelines (67 Federal Register 16,364, April 5, 2002).
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. 2 A. The historic properties identified as of June 6, 2019, are listed in Appendix B. In total, 3 721 archeological sites have been recorded within the Oak Flat Federal Parcel, GPO project 4 components, and the proposed tailings location for Alternatives 2, 3, 4, and 5. Of these, 523 sites have 5 been determined eligible for the NRHP, and 86 sites have been determined not eligible for the NRHP.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Historic Properties. The BLM’s nPA allows more efficient (as opposed to case-by-case) consultation on the evaluation of cultural resources for National Register eligibility when the SHPOs and the BLM agree on the approach. That agreement, as expressed in this Protocol, allows the BLM to determine certain types of properties ineligible without seeking SHPO agreement on each resource determination. However, any BLM FM or CR Staff may contact the SHPO or DPO concerning ineligibility determinations when assistance or additional perspectives related to the decision would be helpful. In the case of this Protocol, the BLMs authority to determine that individual archaeological properties or built environment resources do not meet the eligibility criteria in 36 CFR § 60.4, is limited to the following procedures.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. A. HTNF, in consultation with the SHPO and other consulting parties as appropriate, shall make determinations of NRHP eligibility for all previously recorded (unevaluated) and newly discovered cultural resources within a Work Plan APE.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Historic Properties

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontract Reports a) Vendor shall electronically provide each Customer with Vendor’s relevant Historically Underutilized Business Subcontracting Report, pursuant to the Contract, as required by Chapter 2161, Texas Government Code. Reports shall also be submitted to DIR.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Evaluation Reports Where a formal evaluation of an employee's performance is carried out, the employee shall be provided with a copy to read and review. Provision shall be made on the evaluation form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee's signature in two (2) places, one indicating that the employee has read and accepts the evaluation, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the evaluation. The employee shall sign in one of the places provided within seven (7) calendar days. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of an evaluation report unless the signature indicates disagreement with the evaluation. The employee shall receive a copy of the evaluation report at the time of signing. An evaluation report shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.

  • Selection of projects and financial parameters 4.1 Open calls and availability of funds (including number of calls, duration of calls, and estimated size):

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.