FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED. DRAFT The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal: Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below.
FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED. The following evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below. A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the “Evaluation Approach”, Paragraph C of this section. During evaluations of each proposal, the Government will assign each Factor 2, Technical, subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings. All other factors shall be evaluated on as an acceptable/not acceptable rating. Factor 1: Experience: Each proposal will be evaluated to determine if the offeror has a minimum of three (3) years of experience (within the past 5 years) in each of the three
FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED a FACTOR I TECHNICAL
FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED. 1. Evaluation of the offeror’s proposal shall address each subfactor as it applies to the PWS. A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the “Evaluation Approach”, paragraph C of this section. During evaluations of each proposal, the Source Selection Evaluation Board / Source Selection Team (SST) will assign each subfactor an adjectival rating and provide a written narrative evaluation of the identified findings.
FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED. Evaluation and award of this contract will be made in accordance with the Best Value Continuum Tradeoff procedures described in FAR Part 15.101-1 Tradeoff Process for a Best Value Decision. The evaluation Factors and Sub-factors (also known as “selection criteria”) are contained in the RFP Sections L and M, and are incorporated by reference. The following evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to up to three (3) offerors whose proposals are most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and sub-factors described below. (However, the Government reserves the right to award more contracts, if it is deemed in the best interests of the Government.) The Offeror’s proposal is presumed to represent an Offeror’s best effort in response to the solicitation. The Government will perform a cost analysis on the proposal to determine completeness, reasonableness and realism. This analysis may include, but is not limited to, determining if 1) the costs are realistic for the work to be performed, 2) reflect a clear understanding of the contract requirements, and 3) are inclusive of all services requested. A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the “Evaluation Approach,” Paragraph C of this section. DRAFT
FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED. M.3.1. Relative Order of Importance Terminology. An evaluation of all offers will be made in accordance with the criteria set forth below. Evaluation criteria consist of four factors. In order to provide the Offeror with an understanding of the significance assigned by the Government, the factors are assigned a relative order of importance. The following terminology is used:
