Government of Canada. Canada, as in the present case, wished to pursue a judicial review after the jurisdiction and liability phase of a bifurcated proceeding and requested a stay from the tribunal. Canada and the investor in that case both agreed that while a stay was not required by law, the tribunal had the discretion to grant a stay as part of its general authority to control the proceedings. The tribunal in S.D. Xxxxx, in Procedural Order No. 18 dated 26 February 2001, on the facts of that case found that Canada had not presented a persuasive case that the tribunal should not continue with the rest of the proceeding.
16. This Tribunal agrees with the S.
Government of Canada. U.S. Department of Energy Government of Mexico Government of France Union Fenosa Distribucion Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico (RSE S.p.A.) Government of Austria Swiss Federal Office of Energy New Technology Development and Industrialization Government of Australia New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
Government of Canada. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Government of Canada reasoned: Taking into account the objectives of the NAFTA, and the obligation of the Parties to interpret and apply its provisions in light of those objectives, the Tribunal does not accept that an otherwise meritorious claim should fail solely by reason of the corporate structure adopted by a claimant in order to organise the way in which it conducts its business affairs. The Tribunal’s view is reinforced by the use of the word “indirectly” in the second of the definitions quoted above [i.e. the definition of “investment of an investor of a Party”].271 (emphasis added)
Government of Canada. Guide on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Terminology. Xxxxxx.xx. Published March 28, 2022. Accessed August 30, 2023. xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx/en/publications/equite-diversite- inclusionequity-diversity-inclusion-eng
Government of Canada. FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN AGREED MINUTES Both Parties confirm their understandings that:
Government of Canada. The Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change, xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xx/content/dam/themes/environment/documents/weather1/20170106-‐1-‐en. pdf
Government of Canada. Original signed by: Original signed by: Minister of State (Infrastructure and Communities) Premier of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Island Minister of Atlantic Canada Opportunity Agency Minister of Community and Cultural Affairs Federation of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Island Municipalities
Government of Canada a. Municipal Relations 1. Heavy Equipment Search and Rescue (XXXXX) Xxxxx 525 525 - Total Government of Canada (Municipal Relations) 525 525 - Municipal Board Community Planning and Development Assistant Deputy Minister Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Office of the Fire Commissioner Fire Commissioner Xxxx Xxxxxx Keystone Centre Inland Port Special Planning Area Board Manitoba Code of Conduct Manitoba Water Services Board Municipal Board The Forks North Portage Partnership Provides executive planning, management, and directs departmental policies and programs while overseeing their implementation. Delivers the comptrollership function and central management services, including financial and administrative services and budget oversight.
Government of Canada. Example of Contribution Contribution Fundings Strategic Priorities Board Of Directors Government of Nunavut Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. An out-of-court settlement agreement, signed in May 2015 by Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated, the Government of Nunavut (GN) and the Government of Canada (GoC) Example of Contribution Settlement Agreement Government of Canada Fundings Strategic Priorities Board Of Directors Government of Nunavut Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. $175 million to create Inuit Training Corporation (Makigiaqta): Settlement Agreement
