Interlocal Agreements Clause Samples
The Interlocal Agreements clause establishes the framework for cooperation and collaboration between two or more governmental entities. It typically outlines the terms under which these entities can jointly exercise powers, share resources, or coordinate services, such as law enforcement, public works, or emergency response. By formalizing these arrangements, the clause ensures legal clarity and operational efficiency, enabling governments to address shared needs or projects more effectively than they could individually.
Interlocal Agreements. The governing bodies of school administrative units and career and technical education regions are authorized to enter into interlocal agreements in accordance with Title 30‑A, chapter 115 and may organize or cause to be organized joint boards and legal entities including public nonprofit corporations under Title 13, chapter 81 and Title 13‑B to purchase telecommunications services and to acquire customer premise telecommunications, as defined by the Public Utilities Commission, and related technology equipment. [PL 1997, c. 664, §1 (NEW); PL 2003, c. 545, §5 (REV).]
Interlocal Agreements. PARD enters into an agreement with another governmental entity either for services or to provide services. May be driven by PARD business need or it may be Council directed. While PARD periodically evaluates the need for the “service”- there may be other considerations for maintaining the agreements
Interlocal Agreements. The Agency anticipates that it will enter into separate Interlocal Agreement with the City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the “County”), and the Jordan School District (the “School District”) (collectively, the “Interlocal Agreements”) pursuant to which the County and the School District will agree to pay to the Agency Tax Increment and the City has agreed to pay the Agency Tax Increment for purposes of funding part of the costs of developing the Project Area. The Agency agrees to use good faith effort to negotiate and enter into such Interlocal Agreements. At such time as the Interlocal Agreements are executed, they will be attached to this Agreement as Exhibit G. The Participant acknowledges that Agency’s obligations under this Agreement are conditioned on the execution of the Interlocal Agreements by the County and School District.
Interlocal Agreements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners may authorize the inclusion of the fee assessment of one quarter (1/4) of one percent in any exempted contract at the time of award. Nothing contained above shall in any way limit the powers of the Inspector General to perform audits on all County contracts including, but not limited to, those contracts specifically exempted above. The Miami-Dade County Inspector General is authorized and empowered to review past, present and proposed County and Public Health Trust contracts, transactions, accounts, records and programs. In addition, the Inspector General has the power to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, require the production of records and monitor existing projects and programs. Monitoring of an existing project or program may include a report concerning whether the project is on time, within budget and in conformance with plans, specifications and applicable law. The Inspector General is empowered to analyze the necessity of and reasonableness of proposed change orders to the Contract. The Inspector General shall have the power to audit, investigate, monitor, oversee, inspect and review operations, activities, performance and procurement process, including but not limited to project design, specifications, proposal submittals, activities of the Contractor, its officers, agents and employees, lobbyists, County staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with contract specifications and to detect fraud and corruption. _M_i8_m_i-D_8_d_e_C_ou_n_I_yF_L, •••••• 1 Contract No. BW-l0067 Upon written notice to the Contractor from the Inspector General or IPSIG retained by the Inspector General, the Contractor shall make all requested records and documents available to the Inspector General or IPSIG for inspection and copying. The Inspector General and IPSIG shall have the right to inspect and copy all documents and records in the Contractor's possession, custody or control which, in the Inspector General's or IPSIG's sole judgment, pertain to performance of the contract, including, but not limited to original estimate files, change order estimate files, worksheets, proposals and agreements form and which successful and unsuccessful subcontractors and suppliers, all project-related correspondence, memoranda, instructions, financial documents, construction documents, proposal and contract documents, back-charge documents, all documents and records which involve cash, trade...
Interlocal Agreements. The District is authorized to enter into interlocal agreements with the Other Southeast Travis County Districts, with Travis County and with the City for purposes permitted by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Government Code; the Enabling Legislation and this Agreement. All interlocal agreements between the District and one or more of the Other Southeast Travis County Districts, other than Shared Facilities Contracts that only provide for cost-sharing in Major Water and Wastewater Facilities and Internal Water and Wastewater Facilities based on each district’s prorata share of capacity in the facilities covered by the contract, which will not require City review or approval, must be submitted to the PDRD Director and the Utility Director and will be subject to their review and approval prior to execution, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. A copy of any Shared Facilities Contract only providing for cost-sharing on a prorata basis must be filed with the PDRD Director and the Utility Director at least three business days prior to the date of the Board meeting at which the contract is considered by the District. The PDRD Director and the Utility Director will timely review all interlocal agreements submitted under this Section and either approve them or provide written comments specifically identifying any changes required for approval within 45 days of receipt.
Interlocal Agreements. PARD enters into an agreement with another governmental entity either for services or to provide services. May be driven by PARD business need or it may be Council directed. While PARD periodically evaluates the need for the “service”- there may be other considerations for maintaining the agreements Partnership: Cooperation, collaboration, working together for public benefit.- with non-profit organizations- and they are not necessarily subject to bid processes. These partners should adhere to recently developed base terms associated with partnership levels (operations and maintenance) Concessions: Relationship with for-profit or non-profit where the contractual partner earns money by using parkland. The contractual partner pays a portion of the revenue to PARD. PARD periodically evaluates whether this “service” continues to be a business need priority. Formal solicitations are typical for these relationships. In some cases, Council provides specific direction*.
Interlocal Agreements. Controlling external influencer schedules (TxDOT FY Bid Letting, CAMPO TIP)
Interlocal Agreements. Each district school board
Interlocal Agreements. Brevard County utilizes selective routing to eliminate central office overlaps with adjoining counties. Therefore, there is no specific requirement for an inter-local agreement.
Interlocal Agreements. Assist in the development of interlocal agreements (ILA) with the City of Austin, generation of ▇▇▇ exhibits, review of ILA drafts, and City of Austin coordination support, as directed by the Authority.