Joint Planning and Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. The parties believe it is important to clearly articulate how all the components of the performance partnership are interrelated and sequenced. We will carry out the following joint planning and evaluation process, modified from last year to reflect our conversion to a two-year agreement covering FY 06-07. Actions Annual Milestones 1. Annual Environmental Conditions Report July 2. Senior Management Planning Meeting July 3. Agreement/Work plan Negotiations August/September or Mid-Course Updates 4. Final Performance Partnership Agreement October or Mid-Course Updates 5. State's Performance Report for PPG November/December 6. Region's Evaluation of State's Annual Report February and overall progress. As noted above, certain elements of our joint planning and evaluation process will continue to occur every year (Annual Conditions Report, State’s Performance Report for PPG, and Region’s Evaluation of State Annual Report and overall progress). Other elements will be adjusted to address mid-course assessment and any necessary updates/modifications during the FY 06 cycle. The Annual Performance Report for the PPG and the Annual Environmental Conditions Report are key components of the performance review. In addition, each media office has a documented post award management process, which they will continue to follow. These processes provide for periodic program meetings, conference calls, program and file reviews, as appropriate. Finally, the two Agencies’ have also developed a Reporting Requirement Inventory, which documents the various reporting requirements associated with grants and programs due to statute, regulations and/or other policies and agreements. Illinois EPA will continue to fulfill these reporting requirements as outlined in the Inventory, unless a specific item is raised and/or renegotiated. All relevant information is taken into account as part of the joint evaluation process. Another critical element in this joint evaluation process is the Senior Management Planning meeting, and the corresponding mid-year check-in meeting. It is expected that national program guidance should be available well before these meetings, allowing for identification of any critical commitment concerns. In addition, one agenda item for these meetings will be a senior level discussion of performance highlights and areas of concern. These discussions will be documented via joint meeting notes. A second agenda topic for the Senior Management Planning meeting will be joint ...