Joint Planning and Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. The parties believe it is important to clearly articulate how all the components of the performance partnership are interrelated and sequenced. We will carry out the following joint planning and evaluation process. Actions Milestones 1. Annual Environmental Conditions Report July 2. Senior Management Planning Meeting July/August 3. Agreement/Work plan Negotiations August/September 4. Final Performance Partnership Agreement October 5. State's Performance Report for PPG November/December 6. Region's Evaluation of State's Annual Report February and overall progress. The Annual Performance Report for the PPG and the Annual Environmental Conditions Report are key components of the performance review. In addition, each media office has a documented post award management process, which they will continue to follow. These processes provide for periodic program meetings, conference calls, program and file reviews, as appropriate. Finally, the two Agencies’ have also developed a Reporting Requirement Inventory, which documents the various reporting requirements associated with grants and programs due to statute, regulations and/or other policies and agreements. Illinois EPA will continue to fulfill these reporting requirements as outlined in the Inventory, unless a specific item is raised and/or renegotiated. All relevant information is taken into account as part of the joint evaluation process. Another critical element in this joint evaluation process is the Senior Management Planning meeting. It is expected that national program guidance should be available well before this meeting, allowing for identification of any critical commitment concerns. In addition, one agenda item for these meetings will be a senior level discussion of performance highlights and areas of concern. These discussions will be documented via joint meeting notes. Another agenda topic for the Senior Management Planning meeting will be joint priorities. Preparation for the meeting will include development of brief progress reports for existing joint priorities, with recommendations for renewal or not. To ensure new joint priorities get underway, the lead Region 5 Division Director and Bureau Chief for that joint priority will ensure that a check-in call occurs during the second quarter, with progress reported back to the senior managers and PPA leads for each Agency. On-going joint priorities will be addressed by the lead media programs as part of their normal interactions during the year.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. The parties believe it is important to clearly articulate how all the components of the performance partnership are interrelated and sequenced. We will carry out the following joint planning and evaluation process, a two-year agreement covering FY 08-09. Actions Annual Milestones
Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. 40 CFR 35.115 requires the Illinois EPA and U.S. EPA to develop a process for jointly evaluating the workplan components and activities agreed to under this PPA. The evaluation process will include: 1. A discussion of accomplishments as measured against workplan commitments;
Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 both agree that it is important to clearly articulate how all the components of the performance partnership are evaluated. In order to evaluate this agreement, both agencies will participate in a joint planning and evaluation process. The process timeline is as follows: Actions Deadlines Senior Management Planning Meeting (2013-2015 PPA) June 2013 Ohio EPA/USEPA Program-to-Program Meetings (2013-2015 PPA) August 2013 Workplan Negotiation (2013-2015 PPA) August 2013 Draft PPA Finalized (2013-2015 PPA) September 2013 2013-2015 PPA Begins October 1, 2013 Joint Assessment Process Meeting July 2014 Joint Assessment Process Conditions Report December 30, 2014 USEPA R5’s Evaluation of Report February 2015 2013-2015 PPA Final Environmental Conditions Report December 2015 Senior Management Planning Meeting (2015-2017 PPA) April 2015 Ohio EPA/USEPA Program-to-Program Meetings (2015-2017 PPA) April/May 2015 Workplan Negotiation (2015-2017 PPA) April 2015 Draft PPA Finalized (2015-2017 PPA) June 2015 2015-2017 PPA Begins October 1, 2015 Joint Assessment Process Meeting July 2016 Joint Assessment Process Conditions Report December 30, 2016 USEPA R5’s Evaluation of Report February 2017 2013-2015 PPA Final Environmental Conditions Report December 2017 The joint assessment process for this agreement will: • Allow for a check in at the mid-term Joint Assessment Process Meeting to determine if revisions or additions to the document are necessary to reflect changes in Ohio EPA and USEPA needs; • Provide general discussion, measurements of outcomes and analyze the environmental and programmatic results of each element; • Identify emerging issues, environmental trends and strategies for improvement; • Provide flexibility in both form and substance, as warranted by program performance; • Seek to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary efforts and reporting; • Respond with appropriate solutions, including redirecting goals and resources; • Encourage Ohio EPA to find innovative program implementation alternatives, as long as the desired result is able to be measured and achieved. The success of each outcome of this agreement relies on clear, constructive communication and the commitment of Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 to work together to implement Ohio EPA’s Plan-Do-Check- Improve model (now Quality Services through Partnership model), to solve problems and improve the programs. If any differences exist on specific issues or problems, Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 should move...

Related to Joint Planning and Evaluation Process

  • Procurement Planning Prior to the issuance of any invitations to bid for contracts, the proposed procurement plan for the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines. Procurement of all goods and works shall be undertaken in accordance with such procurement plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Project Planning GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS; ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE; PUBLIC INFORMATION 30 4.1 Planning and Engineering Activities 30 4.2 Site Conditions 30 4.3 Governmental Approvals 30 4.4 Environmental Compliance 34 4.5 Community Outreach and Public Information 35

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least fifteen (15) days written notice to the SLDC / ALDC / DISCOM as the case may be, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System. 4.1.2 Subject to Article 4.1.1, the Power Project may be synchronized by the Power Producer to the Grid System when it meets all the connection conditions prescribed in the Grid Code and otherwise meets all other Indian legal requirements for synchronization to the Grid System. 4.1.3 The synchronization equipment and all necessary arrangements / equipment including Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) for scheduling of power generated from the Project and transmission of data to the concerned authority as per applicable regulation shall be installed by the Power Producer at its generation facility of the Power Project at its own cost. The Power Producer shall synchronize its system with the Grid System only after the approval of GETCO / SLDC / ALDC and GEDA. 4.1.4 The Power Producer shall immediately after each synchronization / tripping of generator, inform the sub-station of the Grid System to which the Power Project is electrically connected in accordance with applicable Grid Code. 4.1.5 The Power Producer shall commission the Project within SCOD. 4.1.6 The Power Producer shall be required to obtain Developer and/ or Transfer Permission, Key Plan drawing etc, if required, from GEDA. In cases of conversion of land from Agricultural to Non-Agriculture, the commissioning shall be taken up by GEDA only upon submission of N.A. permission by the Power Producer. 4.1.7 The Power Producer shall be required to follow the Forecasting and Scheduling procedures as per the Regulations issued by Hon’ble GERC from time to time. It is to clarify that in terms of GERC (Forecasting, Scheduling, Deviation Settlement and Related Matters of Solar and Wind Generation Sources) Regulations, 2019 the procedures for Forecasting, Scheduling & Deviation Settlment are applicable to all solar generators having combined installed capacity above 1 MW connected to the State Grid / Substation including those connected via pooling stations.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Selection Planning Prior to the issuance to consultants of any requests for proposals, the proposed plan for the selection of consultants under the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Consultant Guidelines. Selection of all consultants’ services shall be undertaken in accordance with such selection plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Transition Planning The AGENCY will be responsible for the development of the student’s Transition Plan, which begins upon entry and is completed prior to the student’s exit.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!