We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

File Reviews Sample Clauses

File ReviewsDuring the year, certain stakeholders of BSU including management, treaty reinsurance partners and various state insurance departments may, and as respects treaty reinsurance partners, will, conduct file reviews to measure compliance with state laws, guidelines, treaty terms and letters of authority. As such, underwriting files should be clear, organized, complete and available upon request. All referral and exception authorizations must be in the file and in writing. Ø Application relied upon for underwriting. Bowhead Application if received after quoting should be reviewed to ensure consistency of information with original application and included in file as well as any supporting information attached to the application or relied upon for quoting Ø Financial Information or other product critical information as applicable Ø Rating worksheet or system generated summary Ø Underwriting support documents Ø Underwriters workup with analysis and summary Ø Loss runs Ø Bowhead Claim information Ø Quote Letters Ø Binder Ø Policy with all endorsements Ø Underwriting Correspondence / emails Ø Referral documentation if applicable Ø Accounting Invoice and other issues Casualty Underwriting Guidelines The Casualty Lines Department (CLD) of Bowhead Specialty Underwriters (BSU) was formed in November 2020 by hiring experienced casualty experts with a proven track record of building a portfolio from scratch and creating consistent underwriting profits throughout the market cycle. Excess Casualty coverage will be written for a broad variety of commercial entities but will initially focus on the construction and manufacturing segments where current pricing conditions and capacity restrictions have created a significant opportunity. CLD will institute a collaborative underwriting culture, utilizing underwriting roundtables to discuss individual risks. Each underwriter in CLD will be granted authority over time, as set forth in the Letter of Authority (LOA) issued to that underwriter. CLD’s focus will always be on profits versus premium; this concept is rooted in BSU’s DNA. Product and coverage The goal of CLD is to provide a solution-based Excess Casualty product to commercial insureds and brokers across the country. As a general matter, Excess Casualty policies provide coverage for catastrophic Commercial General Liability and Automobile exposures of an insured. Though the coverage may also apply above other exposures (e.g., liquor liability in hospitality risks), these oth...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
File Reviews. Vendor shall give Health Plan access, upon request, to Vendor’s files for Health Plan’s review. Such files may exclude bona fide confidential peer review files. At least annually, or more frequently if deemed necessary by Health Plan representatives, Vendor or Vendor Provider, as applicable, will permit Health Plan to perform on-site performance compliance review, including without limitation review of any verification and re-verification files, upon not less than ten (10) days written notification by Health Plan. Upon request, Vendor shall provide copies of requested files (i) promptly following Health Plan’s request if the request is made during such on-site review, and (ii) upon not less than ten (10) days following Health Plan’s request if the request is made outside of any such on-site review.
File Reviews. 8.2(1) A new Repair Certifier’s first 30 certification files will be subjected to a File Review process by RepairCert NZ (see Note 1 below).
File Reviews. Annually, or as needed, Provider shall give Health Plan access, upon request, to credentialing and recredentialing files for remote review, excluding any confidential peer review files. Provider agrees to obtain from each Credentialed Provider the appropriate consent and authorization for the release of credentialing and recredentialing information to Health Plan. All credentialing and recredentialing files will contain appropriate consent and authorization for the release of credentialing and recredentialing information not more than six months old at the time of Provider credentialing committee approval. At least annually, or more frequently, and by type (e.g., desk audit, on-site visit) as deemed necessary by Health Plan representatives, Provider will permit Health Plan to perform performance compliance review, including without limitation review of any credentialing and recredentialing files, upon not less than 10 days written notification by Health Plan. Upon request from NCQA to Health Plan and Health Plan’s subsequent notification of the NCQA request to the Provider, Provider shall provide copies of requested files in accordance with the NCQA’s designated time frame.
File Reviews. A. By March 1, 2025, OEO will review the University’s response to each report of discrimination and/or harassment on the basis of shared ancestry that the University received for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 school years. As part of this review, OEO will determine, to the extent it has not done so already, whether the University made a prompt and effective response, including determining whether any conduct created a hostile environment in a University program or activity based on race, color, or national origin, including based on shared ancestry, including when the conduct occurred off campus or on social media, was verbal, involved multiple or unidentified harassers, or was directed at a group or class rather than a specific person. If the University’s review reveals that it did not complete a determination or promptly and effectively respond to any of the reports made during the 2022-2023 or 2023-2024 school years, the University will promptly investigate and make a determination regarding whether the alleged conduct occurred and if so whether it created a hostile environment and will notify the relevant parties of its determination and offer services or support to remedy the effects of any harassment for the impacted individual(s) and take any other steps reasonably calculated to prevent recurrence, including disciplinary action when appropriate. The offer of services or support will be made in writing and the individual(s) will have at least 30 days to accept any offer of services. Students and employees who are identified as complainants or respondents in any complaint being investigated will be afforded rights pursuant to the applicable University rule, policy, employment agreement, or collective bargaining agreement. B. By June 15, 2025, and June 15, 2026, the University will provide OCR with an electronic sortable spreadsheet or other file of the University’s response to all reports alleging discrimination, including harassment, on the basis of shared ancestry, during the preceding academic year. At a minimum, the spreadsheet will include separate fields for: 1. The date of receipt of the written or oral report. 2. The name and relationship of the reporter, if applicable (e.g., self, faculty, employee, eyewitness, colleague) to the allegedly injured person(s). 3. The name of the individual or group who was allegedly discriminated against/xxxxxxxx (complainant) and relationship to the University (e.g., student, student organization, faculty, employ...
File Reviews. 4.7.1. The Client will not pay for file reviews, unless: 4.7.1.1. they are prompted by a legal or factual development, such as the receipt of correspondence or a telephone call; and 4.7.1.2. they result in the creation of actual work product, such as a strategy note, a strategy plan, a letter, a report, or a telephone call. 4.7.2. Where a file is to be reviewed because of a change of fee earner or the current unavailability of the previous fee earner, the time spent reading in by new personnel will not be allowed. 4.7.3. Where, however, the file transfer is occasioned by a cause or causes beyond the control of the Law Firm, such time will be allowed provided this is appropriately noted on the relevant draft invoice, including the specific cause or causes of the file transfer.

Related to File Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the Funder or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the Funder or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to: inspect and copy any financial records, invoices and other finance- related documents, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding or otherwise to the Services; and inspect and copy non-financial records, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding, the Services or otherwise to the performance of the HSP under this Agreement. (b) The cost of any Review will be borne by the HSP if the Review: (1) was made necessary because the HSP did not comply with a requirement under the Enabling Legislation or this Agreement; or (2) indicates that the HSP has not fulfilled its obligations under this Agreement, including its obligations under Applicable Law and Applicable Policy. (c) To assist in respect of the rights set out in (a) above, the HSP shall disclose any information requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives and shall do so in a form requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives. (d) The HSP may not commence a proceeding for damages or otherwise against any person with respect to any act done or omitted to be done, any conclusion reached or report submitted that is done in good faith in respect of a Review.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • Annual Reviews Within thirty (30) days after each annual anniversary of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Company shall review Employee’s performance of his duties pursuant to this Agreement and advise Employee of the results of that review; provided, however, that Company may elect to conduct a partial-year performance review in order to synchronize Employee’s annual review date with that of the Company’s other executives. In connection with each such review, the Company shall evaluate whether any increase in Employee’s compensation under Section 2, below, is appropriate.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • REPORT SUBMISSION 1. Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F-Audit Requirements, and required by PART I of this form shall be submitted, when required by 2 CFR 200.512, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) as provided in 2 CFR 200.36 and 200.512 A. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse designated in 2 CFR §200.501(a) (the number of copies required by 2 CFR §200.501(a) should be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse), at the following address: Federal Audit Clearinghouse Bureau of the Census 0000 Xxxx 00xx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Submissions of the Single Audit reporting package for fiscal periods ending on or after January 1, 2008, must be submitted using the Federal Clearinghouse’s Internet Data Entry System which can be found at xxxx://xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/facweb/ 2. Copies of financial reporting packages required by PART II of this Attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following: A. The Department of Environmental Protection at one of the following addresses: By Mail: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Inspector General, MS 40 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Electronically: XXXXXxxxxxXxxxx@xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx B. The Auditor General’s Office at the following address: Auditor General Local Government Audits/342 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Building, Room 000 000 Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 00000-1450 The Auditor General’s website (xxxx://xxxxxxxxx.xxx/) provides instructions for filing an electronic copy of a financial reporting package. 3. Copies of reports or management letters required by PART III of this Attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to the Department of Environmental Protection at one of the following addresses: By Mail: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Inspector General, MS 40 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Electronically: XXXXXxxxxxXxxxx@xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx 4. Any reports, management letters, or other information required to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted timely in accordance with 2 CFR 200.512, section 215.97, F.S., and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable. 5. Recipients, when submitting financial reporting packages to the Department of Environmental Protection for audits done in accordance with 2 CFR 200, Subpart F-Audit Requirements, or Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) and 10.650 (non and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date and the reporting package was delivered to the recipient correspondence accompanying the reporting package.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!