JRC Decision Making Sample Clauses

JRC Decision Making. 2.4.1 Each Party’s representatives of the JRC shall have collectively one (1) vote. All decisions of the JRC shall be made whenever possible by unanimous vote.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
JRC Decision Making. The JRC will take action by unanimous vote with each Party having a single vote, irrespective of the number of representatives actually in attendance at a meeting, or by a written resolution signed by all of the designated representatives of each of the Parties. If the JRC is unable to reach unanimous consent on a particular matter within [*****] (unless otherwise agreed) of its initial consideration of such matter, then the matter will be referred to the Executive Officers (or their respective designees; provided, however, that each such designee is not a member of the JRC and occupies a position senior to the positions occupied by the applicable Party’s members of the JRC) of the other Party for resolution. If the Executive Officers are unable to resolve a dispute pursuant to section 3.6 after good faith negotiations (not to extend beyond [*****] unless otherwise agreed), such issue will be decided consistent with [*****].
JRC Decision Making. Each Party’s JRC representatives will collectively have a single vote, and the JRC will operate by unanimous consent of all JRC members present and in accordance with the principles set forth in Section 4.1. The JRC will not have any authority or jurisdiction to amend, modify, or waive compliance with this Agreement, any of which shall require mutual written agreement of the Parties. If a dispute arises between the Parties’ JRC representatives, the matter will be first referred to the Liaisons for resolution. If the Liaisons are unable to resolve the dispute, then the matter will be elevated to the Chief Executive Officer of Ideaya, the Director of the CRUK-MI on behalf of Manchester and the Director, Business development of CRT (or, in either case, a direct report of such individual). If these three (3) individuals are unable to resolve the dispute, then, subject to the last sentence of this Section 4.1(c), Ideaya will have the final decision, so long as such decision does not conflict with the terms of the Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, no decision by Ideaya will: (i) require CRT or Manchester to breach any obligation or agreement that Institute may have with or to a Third Party prior to the Effective Date; (ii) require CRT or Manchester to perform any activities that are materially different or greater in scope than those provided for under the Agreement; or (iii) amend, modify, or waive CRT’s or Manchester’s compliance with, this Agreement, any of which shall require mutual written agreement of the Parties; or (iv) impose or increase any financial burden on CRT or Manchester (other than any financial obligations expressly set forth in this Agreement).
JRC Decision Making. All decisions of the JRC shall be unanimous, with the representatives of Metabasis on the JRC collectively having one vote and the representatives of Roche on the JRC collectively having one vote. If the JRC is unable to decide or resolve unanimously any matter properly presented to it for action, then at the written request of either party, the issue shall be referred to Metabasis’ head of research and development and Roche’s [***] who shall attempt in good faith to resolve such issue as promptly as practicable. If such officers are unable to resolve such issue within [***], then at the written request of either party, the issue shall be referred to the Chief Executive Officer of Metabasis and Roche’s [***]. If such officers are unable to resolve such issue within [***] of commencing such negotiations, then, except as provided in Section 1.3, the resolution and/or course of conduct shall be determined by [***]. However, [***] will give [***] to [***], and [***] to [***] in [***] or [***]. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, [***] the [***] with [***] this [***] shall [***]:
JRC Decision Making. The JRC shall determine, approve or resolve Committee Matters within the authority of the JRC by unanimous vote, with each Party’s representatives on the JRC collectively having one (1) vote. If the JRC representatives of the Parties do not reach consensus as to a particular Committee Matter within [***] days after such matter is first presented to the JRC, after reasonable discussion and good faith consideration of each Party’s comments, then:
JRC Decision Making 

Related to JRC Decision Making

  • Decision-Making The JDC shall make decisions unanimously, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote and at least one (1) representative from each Party participating in such decision. In the event the JDC determines that it cannot reach an agreement regarding a decision within the JDC’s authority, then, within *** Business Days after such determination: (a) for any matter that is not a Critical Issue *** shall have the final decision making authority on such matter; and (b) for any matter that is a Critical Issue, the matter shall be referred to FivePrime’s Chief Executive Officer (or designee) and HGS’ Chief Executive Officer (or designee) for resolution. If such executives cannot resolve the matter within *** Business Days, then the Chief Executive Officer of *** (or designee) shall have the final decision making authority on such matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Development Plan shall not be amended, without FivePrime’s prior written approval (which approval may be withheld in FivePrime’s sole discretion), to: (i) increase or materially change the nature of FivePrime-Conducted Trials or Other FivePrime-Conducted Activities; or (ii) require FivePrime to continue any FivePrime-Conducted Trial if FivePrime, in its reasonable judgment, decides not to continue such trial for any business, scientific, safety, efficacy, enrollment or ethical reason, provided that, in the event FivePrime so decides to discontinue such trial, HGS shall have no further obligation to reimburse FivePrime under Section 4.2(d) except with respect to costs *** INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. already incurred by FivePrime prior to such discontinuation and any and all standard close out costs incurred thereafter, and HGS shall have the right to continue such trial by itself at its expense. When *** make a final determination under this Section 3.4, that final determination must be consistent with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth:

  • Independent Due Diligence and Decision Making Each Consenting Stakeholder hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent investigation of the operations, businesses, financial and other conditions, and prospects of the Company Parties.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Major Decisions (a) any proposed or actual foreclosure upon or comparable conversion of the ownership of the Property or the exercise of any other remedies with respect to the Loan;

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Decision-Making Authority BMS shall have the sole decision-making authority for the operations and Commercialization strategies and decisions, including funding and resourcing, related to the Commercialization of Products; provided that such decisions are not inconsistent with the express terms and conditions of this Agreement, including BMS’ diligence obligations set forth in Section 5.1.

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision Within thirty (30) days after the appointment of the third arbitrator, the three (3) arbitrators shall decide whether the parties will use Landlord’s or Tenant’s submitted Fair Market Rental Value and shall notify Landlord and Tenant of their decision. The decision of the majority the three (3) arbitrators shall be binding on Landlord and Tenant.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!