General Process. If the external review process is initiated, procedures in the Department Policy Statement shall be followed. Those procedures shall, at a minimum, specify the minimum number of recommended external reviews, with a recommended minimum of four external reviewers. Department Policy Statements shall describe the process by which professionally capable external reviewers will be obtained. In the absence of an approved external review policy in the Department Policy Statement, the recommended minimum of four shall prevail, where practicable, and the process will follow the guidelines found in this section of the Agreement. The candidate and the chair of the DPC shall identify the names of the recommended number of mutually acceptable external reviewers. If they are unable to reach agreement on the recommended reviewers, each will be responsible for identifying an equal number of external reviewers until the recommended number has been obtained. Materials sent to the external reviewers should include a vita and other items that demonstrate professional recognition. The candidate and the chair of the DPC should attempt to reach mutual agreement as to these materials. If they are unable to reach agreement, the chair of the DPC shall make the final decision. The department chair will be responsible for sending the materials to the external reviewers. A letter clearly indicating the purpose of the external review and who shall have access to the letters of recommendation shall be sent by the department chair, with a copy to the candidate, to any potential external reviewer selected by the promotion candidate and the chair of the DPC to participate in the external review process (see Appendix E, External Review Process--Promotion and Tenure). The department chair’s request to an external referee must include Western’s statement on confidentiality: “Your letter of evaluation, as part of an official review file, will be held in confidence and will not be disclosed to the faculty member under consideration or to the public except as required by law or University policy. In all such instances, the information made available will be provided in a form that seeks to protect the identity, privacy, and confidentiality of evaluators.” Nothing in the above is intended to prevent a candidate from soliciting external letters. External letters of recommendation shall be made part of the adjunctive promotion file, but shall not be placed in the promotion candidate's permanent pers...
General Process. Based on the criteria and procedures specified in this Agreement, the qualifications and performance of each probationary faculty member shall be reviewed by Western during the second, fourth, and sixth years of his/her appointment. If the probationary period is less than six (6) years, the review schedule shall be stipulated in the letter of appointment. Individual departments may, at their discretion, and in accordance with their Department Policy Statements, conduct more frequent intermediate tenure reviews. Tenure reviews are cumulative. Each subsequent review committee must consider the recommendations of earlier committees. Each tenure recommendation, including a substantiated narrative, shall explicitly state whether it is a positive or negative recommendation in the case of the final tenure award or one of four possible recommendations (positive, positive with conditions, negative with conditions, negative) for continued probationary status. Traditionally ranked faculty at the rank of assistant professor will be promoted to associate professor with the awarding of tenure. For faculty in rank at the level of Faculty Specialist I, promotion to the level of Faculty Specialist II shall be concurrent with the granting of the tenure award, provided tenure is awarded in year four or later after initial appointment. No later than October 15, all faculty who are undergoing tenure review shall submit their tenure files to their department chair (see Timetable in 17.§10 for specific date).
General Process. Department faculty members at or above the rank sought by the promotion candidates shall have the right and responsibility to make negative and positive recommendations, with supporting data, for promotions of colleagues according to this article, the Department Policy Statement, and in accordance with the established criteria and contractual timetable. Each promotion committee shall explicitly state whether it is a positive or a negative recommendation for promotion, with substantiating narrative. For purposes of promotion, the rank of associate professor is considered equivalent to the rank of master faculty specialist, the rank of assistant professor is considered equivalent to the rank of faculty specialist II, and the rank of instructor is considered equivalent to the rank of faculty specialist I. Traditionally ranked faculty at the rank of assistant professor will be promoted to associate professor with the awarding of tenure. For faculty in rank at the level of Faculty Specialist I, promotion to the level of Faculty Specialist II shall be concurrent with the granting of the tenure award, provided tenure is awarded in year four or later after initial appointment.
General Process i. Transfers shall not be used as a disciplinary measure, or for the sake of change or rotation only.
ii. All transfers, except the transfer of a teacher from their community of residence, should be complete by May 1 for transfers effective September 1.
iii. The transfer of a teacher from their community of residence shall require a notice period of:
1. April 30 for transfers effective September 1;
2. September 30 for transfers effective January 1;
General Process. F.1.1 The Parties will encourage their staff and employees to resolve disputes that arise in the provision of Interconnection Services at the lowest practical levels in their respective organisations.
General Process. 4.1.1 TxDOT has commenced the environmental process for the CDA Segments. As part of the NEPA process, TxDOT will prepare NEPA documents (e.g., XXXx, environmental assessments or categorical exclusions, as appropriate) for each CDA Segment or Facility consistent with the Master Development Plan (or, prior to approval of the Master Development Plan, Exhibits B and C), including Facilities that serve a financing or connectivity purpose for the CDA Segments. Issuance of a ROD, FONSI, and/or other decision document would complete the NEPA process and NEPA-related public involvement phase of project development for the specific Facility unless: (i) changes to the project concept, design, or location trigger the need for additional environmental study; (ii) three years lapse from the date of the final Facility NEPA document without approval to undertake final design, acquisition of right-of-way, or approval of plans specifications and estimates, thus triggering a re-evaluation and/or additional environmental study; or (iii) changes in law or environmental conditions trigger the need for additional environmental study.
4.1.2 Developer shall review, comment upon, and generally support activities, including public information activities, undertaken by TxDOT in order to secure environmental approvals as part of the NEPA processes.
General Process. During the Purchase Period, and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, to initiate a Sale the Seller shall provide the Buyer prior written notice in substantially the form of Exhibit E hereto (a "Sale Notice") not later than 2:00 p.m. (New York City time) on the date which is no less than three (3) Business Days prior to the date of a proposed Sale (each such sale date, a "Sale Date"). Such Sale Notice shall specify (i) the principal amount of the Timeshare Loans and (ii) the proposed Sale Date, which must be a Business Day. The Buyer may act without liability upon the basis of written notice believed by the Buyer in good faith to be from the Seller (or from any Authorized Officer thereof designated in writing by the Seller to the Buyer). The Buyer shall be entitled to rely conclusively on any Authorized Officer's authority to request a sa1e on behalf of the Seller until the Buyer receives written notice to the contrary. The Buyer shall have no duty to verify the authenticity of the signature appearing on any written Sale Notice. Unless a Sale Notice is provided by Seller to Buyer as set forth above, the Seller shall not be obligated to sell and the Buyer shall not be obligated to buy any Timeshare Loans.
General Process. An overview of the annual plan update process shall be provided to all of the OC PW/O&M management and senior staff during routine management meetings. The goal is to refresh more experienced staff and orient those less familiar or new employees, with the process. Deliverable: Planning process overview shall be given to OC PW/O&M.
General Process. The JSC, the Project Team, and any Committee established pursuant to this Agreement will only have the powers expressly assigned to it in this Article 7 (Governance) and elsewhere in this Agreement and will not have the authority to: (a) modify or amend the terms of this Agreement; or (b) waive either Party’s compliance with the terms of this Agreement. All decisions of the JSC will be made by unanimous vote, with each Party’s representatives having collectively one vote (i.e., one vote per Party). No action taken at any meeting of the JSC will be effective unless there is a quorum present at all times at such meeting, and at all such meetings, a quorum will be reached if two voting representatives of each Party are present or participating in such meeting. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement, the phrase “determine,” “designate,” “confirm,” “agree,” “approve,” or “determine whether to approve” by the JSC and similar phrases used in this Agreement will mean approval in accordance with this Section 7.4 (Decision-Making), including the escalation and tie-breaking provisions herein. For the avoidance of doubt, matters that are specified in Section 7.2.2 (JSC Roles and Responsibilities) to be reviewed and discussed (as opposed to reviewed, discussed, and determined) do not require any agreement or decision by either Party and are not subject to the voting and decision-making procedures set forth in this Section 7.4 (Decision-Making) or in Section 7.5 (Resolution of JSC Disputes).
General Process. To obtain monetary relief as part of the Settlement, a Class Member must fill out and submit a Claim Form, completed online or in hard copy mailed to the Class Administrator. The claim made via the Claim Form will proceed through the following general steps:
(a) The Claimant will be asked to provide identifying information.
(b) The Claimant will be asked to identify which of the Class Products he or she has purchased since November 2013. For each Class Product purchased since November 2013, the Claimant will be asked to state his or her approximate number of purchases over a typical three-month period. The Claimant will be asked to identify the year he or she began purchasing the product.
(c) An equation running “behind the scenes” will calculate the extrapolated number of units of each Class Product purchased by the Claimant during the Class Period, taking into account the year the Claimant began purchasing the Class Product. Settlement Class Members’ claims without proof of purchase will be subject to a product cap of two boxes per month based on a reasonable average use for the products, but Settlement Class Members’ claims with proof of purchase will have no cap in a given month if proven purchases exceed the two-box cap in that month. The equation will then calculate a dollar amount of “Base Damages” by multiplying the number of units of each Class Product purchased, by a standardized refund of $0.21 per unit purchased, which is based on the premium determined by the Class’s damages models. Based on the distribution of Base Damages calculated for all Claimants, each Claimant will be placed into one of five quintiles.
(d) All Cash Awards will be adjusted pro rata up or down as described in Section
