Multiplicity Sample Clauses

Multiplicity. No multiplicity adjustment needs to be considered for the effectiveness endpoints since no formal hypothesis testing will be conducted.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Multiplicity. If and when included within the term “Tenant,” as used in this instrument, there is more than one person, firm or corporation, all shall jointly arrange among themselves for their joint execution of a notice specifying an individual at a specific address within the continental United States for the receipt of notices and payments to Tenant. All parties included within the terms “Landlord” and “Tenant,” respectively, shall be bound by notices given in accordance with the provisions of Section 25 to the same effect as if each had received such notice.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Multiplicity. Our overview table presents different possible aspects able to be used to provide a more tailored approach to training. Our training will be delivered by creating programmes from appropriate combinations of these existing training modules - an approach that affords great flexibility in accommodating user needs. In the section on the actual training programs that we propose, we will characterize the training modules described within the matrix. 8 Towards the Training Plan In the sections below we map the training modules that partners within and outside of CompBioMed are currently offering. We then used this to formulate a Training Plan that the Centre of Excellence will implement in the next 2.5 years.
Sample 1
Multiplicity. A total of six hypothesis tests will be conducted to address the primary and secondary objectives of the study. A combination of gate-keeping and Bonferroni adjustment strategies will be employed to control the overall type I error rate. The hypothesis tests and the testing order (multiplicity adjustment) are outlined in Figure 15-1.
Sample 1
Multiplicity. The necessity for juxtaposing multiple issues simultaneously, treating phenomena not as isolated but as relational, and therefore seeking more complex intellectual interfaces as the fora for investigating them.
Sample 1
Multiplicity. Another key property that is not adequately accounted for in the current QM logical model and needs to be added is the concept of multiplicity. Multiplicity refers to the reuse of the same questionnaire multiple times. This could happen where a patient had multiple follow ups where the follow-up questionnaire is exactly the same, or perhaps multiple blood samples taken over time and the same sample form filled for each instance. Depending on the rules of the study, a questionnaire could be filled once or multiple times. If it is to be filled multiple times, then it is possible that the number of times it can be filled could be determined by data entry or calculation. For example, a question asking how many household members there are, and then using that answer to limit the number of “household member“ questionnaires that can be filled for this household. It also could be that the number of questionnaires is a fixed number set at the beginning of the study. For example, the study protocol could call for only three follow up visits to each household. It could also be the case that the ability to add new questionnaire instances is determined by a Boolean true/false condition evaluated constantly based on data entry or calculation that allows new instances to be created. It could also be that there is no limit to the number of new instances of the questionnaire that could be filled. A nosocomial study that has brief follow ups for every day that a patient stays in the hospital may require a practically unlimited (or at least unforeseeable) number of questionnaires to be filled.
Sample 1

Related to Multiplicity

  • Multiple Roles The parties expressly acknowledge and consent to Xxxxx Fargo Bank, National Association, acting in the multiple roles of the Indenture Trustee, the Custodian, the Back-Up Servicer and the Successor Servicer. Xxxxx Fargo Bank, National Association may, in such capacities, discharge its separate functions fully, without hindrance or regard to conflict of interest principles, duty of loyalty principles or other breach of fiduciary duties to the extent that any such conflict or breach arises from the performance by Xxxxx Fargo Bank, National Association of express duties set forth in this Indenture in any of such capacities, all of which defenses, claims or assertions are hereby expressly waived by the other parties hereto except in the case of negligence (other than errors in judgment) and willful misconduct by Xxxxx Fargo Bank, National Association.

  • Components Patheon will purchase and test all Components (with the exception of Client-Supplied Components) at Patheon’s expense and as required by the Specifications.

  • Different Denominations This Note is exchangeable for an equal aggregate principal amount of Notes of different authorized denominations, as requested by the Holder surrendering the same. No service charge will be payable for such registration of transfer or exchange.

  • Increases Not later than 2:00 p.m. (New York City time) on the second (2nd) Business Day prior to a proposed borrowing, Borrower shall provide the Funding Agent with written notice of each Advance in the form set forth as Exhibit II-A hereto (each, a “Borrowing Notice”). The Funding Agent shall promptly provide each such Borrowing Notice to the Co-Agents. Each Borrowing Notice shall be subject to Section 6.2 hereof and, except as set forth below, shall be irrevocable and shall specify the requested increase in Aggregate Principal (which shall not be less than $5,000,000 or a larger integral multiple of $100,000) and the Borrowing Date and the requested Interest Rate and Interest Period for any portion to be funded by any Committed Lender. Upon receipt of a Borrowing Notice, (a) each Unaffiliated Committed Lender severally agrees to fund a Loan in an amount equal to its Percentage of the requested Advance specified in such Borrowing Notice, and (b) each Co-Agent shall determine whether its Conduit will fund a Loan in an amount equal to its Conduit Group’s Percentage of the requested Advance specified in such Borrowing Notice. If a Conduit declines to make its Percentage of a proposed Advance, Borrower may cancel the Borrowing Notice as to all Lenders or, in the absence of such a cancellation, the Advance will be made by each Unaffiliated Committed Lender, each other Conduit and such Conduit’s Committed Lenders. On the date of each Advance, upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions precedent set forth in Article VI, each applicable Lender will cause the proceeds of its Loan comprising a portion of such Advance to be deposited to the Funding Account, in immediately available funds, no later than 2:30 p.m. (New York City time), an amount equal to (i) in the case of a Conduit or an Unaffiliated Committed Lender, its Percentage of the principal amount of the requested Advance or (ii) in the case of a Conduit’s Committed Lender, each such Committed Lender’s Pro Rata Share of its Conduit Group’s Percentage of the principal amount of the requested Advance. The Funding Agent shall remit such funds (to the extent received in the Funding Account) to the Facility Account, no later than 4:00 p.m. (New York City time) on such date.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!