PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA Sample Clauses

PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA. The project must be pertinent and realistic; - The entrepreneur must own at least 25% of the business shares; - The entrepreneur must prove that he has obtained all the necessary financing; - The project must not create direct competition with Pontiac businesses; - The entrepreneur must not have defaulted on paying government debts and must be free of any bankruptcy judgement; - If the entrepreneur has already received funding from the BSP, the first project must be completed according to program standards; - The project must demonstrate economic benefits and/or job creation; - The business support project must contribute to the sustainability and long-term viability of the company. The Investment Committee has the right to recommend an investment in a project, or render an expense eligible, if it judges that the project demonstrates that it will create an impact on: economic diversification, economic benefits for the region or job creation.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA. A. 1.1 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS To be eligible for funding, a Project must: a) Be submitted by an Applicant who demonstrates that it will be able to operate and maintain the resulting Infrastructure over the long term; b) Fall within one of the applicable Project categories hereunder, be consistent with the objectives of the category and directly related to one of its subcategories and meet its mandatory screening criteria; c) Be ranked on how and to what extent it meets the category ranking criteria as outlined in the table shown section A.12; d) Be for the construction, renewal, expansion or material enhancement of a community public Infrastructure; e) Be supported by a business case that is comprehensive, credible and feasible and meets the requirements of the Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Business Case Guideline; f) Stipulate a construction completion date of no later than March 31, 2010; g) Be duly authorized or endorsed by: i) a resolution of the Applicant’s council; or ii) in the case of a non-governmental Applicant, by its Board of Directors and also by a resolution of the Local Government council where the Infrastructure is proposed to be located; and h) Meet the requirements of all applicable federal and provincial legislation.
Sample 1
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA a. To meet the minimum State and Federal requirements the following criteria shall be considered when developing the Project Priorities list: i. The approved TPO Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) ii. The Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Plan developed under subsection 339.64 F.S. iii. The results of the TPO’s Transportation Management Systems iv. The TPO’s Public Involvement Procedures b. The TPO may also consider the following when developing the Project Priorities List:: i. The results of the annual State of the System (SOS) Report, prepared annually to meet the requirements of the Congestion Management System adopted in 1997. ii. Hurricane and other emergency evacuation needs. iii. Crash history and public safety. iv. Regional connectivity. v. Current and future traffic volumes and level of service standards. vi. The historic standing of projects within the Priority List and prior funding commitments.
Sample 1
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA. A. 1.1 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS To be eligible for funding, a Project must: a) Be submitted by an Applicant who demonstrates that it will be able to operate and maintain the resulting Infrastructure over the long term; b) Fall within one of the Project subcategories hereunder and meet its mandatory screening criteria; c) Be consistent with the objectives of the applicable Project category; d) Be for the construction, renewal, expansion or material enhancement of a community public Infrastructure; e) Be supported by a business case that is comprehensive, credible and feasible and meets the requirements of the Canada-Yukon Business Case Guideline f) Stipulate a construction completion date of no later than March 31, 2011; g) Dependent on the nature of the Applicant, be duly authorized or endorsed by a resolution of the Applicant’s Council, Board of Directors, or Chief in Council, or where the Applicant is Yukon, have the required financial approvals; or, in the case of a non-governmental Applicant, also by a resolution of the municipal Council where the Infrastructure is proposed to be located; and h) Meet the requirements of all applicable federal and territorial legislation.
Sample 1
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA. As a general rule, the Alliance will adopt projects that benefit at least two or more of the member counties, although the Alliance will support projects that benefit only one county. The Alliance will also strive for proportional geographic representation of projects.
Sample 1
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA. This section describes the criteria used to select the current and planned projects on Exhibit 4.6- A. The projects listed in Exhibit 4.6-A are extracted from the Incumbent Service Provider's Remedy system and/or DIR direction based on previously defined work efforts. These projects require activity/effort on the part of the Successful Respondent. Projects that are specific to an SCP or SCPs, but do not require MSI involvement outside of steady state Cross-functional services were not included in this list. The projects listed in Exhibit 4.6-A are a point in time reference and may be modified by DIR based on needs of the Shared Services program prior to Commencement Date with notification to the Successful Respondent as appropriate.
Sample 1
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA. The following criteria will guide the Vitalization Committee in analyzing projects: - Consistency with the vitalization framework; - The promoter's ability to carry out the project; - The quality of the financing plan; - The quality of the project implementation plan; - The quality of the governance structure; - The mobilization and commitment of the community; - The duration of the project (time limit, one-time and non-recurring) - The sustainability of the project.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA. A.1.1 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS a) Be submitted by an Applicant that demonstrates that they will be able to operate and maintain the resulting Infrastructure over the long term; b) Fall within one of the applicable Project categories hereunder, be consistent with the objectives of the category and directly related to one of its subcategories, meet one or more of the Project outcomes of the category and meet the mandatory Project criteria of the category; c) Be ranked in accordance with the ranking matrix to be developed by the Oversight Committee; d) Be for the construction, renewal, expansion, upgrade, or material enhancement of infrastructure, however, excluding normal maintenance or operation;
Sample 1

Related to PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Desirable Selection Criteria Post registration qualification in the area of specialty or evidence of significant progression towards one.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Design Criteria A/E shall prepare all work in accordance with the latest version of applicable County’s procedures, specifications, manuals, guidelines, standard drawings, and standard specifications. A/E shall prepare each Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) package in a form suitable for letting through County’s construction contract bidding and awarding process.

  • Target Population TREATMENT FOR ADULT (TRA) Target Population

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Concession Area, including its abandonment.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones: 6.1 Substantial Site work completed. On or before December 31, 2020 Interconnection Customer must demonstrate completion of at least 20% of project site construction. At this time, Interconnection Customer must submit to Interconnected Transmission Owner and Transmission Provider initial drawings, certified by a professional engineer, of the Customer Interconnection Facilities. 6.2 Delivery of major electrical equipment. On or before December 31, 2021, Interconnection Customer must demonstrate that all generating units have been delivered to Interconnection Customer’s project site.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!