Public Transit Sample Clauses

Public Transit. No public transportation systems will be created or expanded as part of this subdivision
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Transit. NWIRP strives to be an environmentally conscious organization and promotes and encourages the use of public transit by staff whenever possible. Employees meeting the following criteria may opt into a public transit program whereby they pay up to fifty percent (50%) of their monthly public transit costs, with the Employer paying the remaining cost: Tacoma office employees (who opt out of the Employer provided-parking) and Seattle office employees. During the COVID-19 state of emergency NWIRP and the Union have agreed to suspend the transit program. Please see the Letter of Understanding.
Public Transit a) Objective The public transit stream will primarily build new urban transit networks and service extensions that will transform the way that Canadians live, move and work.
Public Transit. Employees are eligible to be reimbursed for the cost of Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) All Access College Transit Passes or U-Pass College Student Pass during periods where they have an appointment under this Agreement. Reimbursement requests must be submitted in accordance with applicable policy which will allow for reimbursement for two (2) purchased passes at once. All eligible employees will be communicated directly to the relevant transit authorities.
Public Transit. The subdivision does not require improvements to ensure public transit service.
Public Transit. There are no MET Transit routes that service this subdivision at this time. No improvements with regard to MET Transit vehicles are anticipated at this time.
Public Transit a) Objective The public transit stream will primarily build new urban transit networks and service extensions that will transform the way that Canadians live, move and work. b) Canada’s Contribution i. Fiscal Year Breakdown Canada’s total contribution funding for all Projects under the public transit stream will be allocated in accordance with the estimated maximum amounts in the Public Transit Fiscal Year Breakdown Table, as amended through administrative processes: Public Transit Fiscal Year Breakdown Table Canada ($M) 2017 – 2018 $0.0000 2018 – 2019 $176.0276 2019 – 2020 $262.9273 2020 – 2021 $304.8917 2021 – 2022 $437.0981 2022 – 2023 $529.1969 2023 – 2024 $714.8800 2024 – 2025 $864.5406 2025 – 2026 $1,280.4708 2026 – 2027 $1,310.5514 2027 – 2028 $1,587.5907 TOTAL $7,468.1750 ii. Allocation to Ultimate Recipient a) Ontario agrees to allocate Canada’s public transit stream contribution funding to each Ultimate Recipient based solely on ridership as set out in the Public Transit Sub-Allocation Table: Bancroft 9,317 Barrie 2,587,964 Belleville 906,218 Blind River 1,385 Bradford West Gwillimbury 25,541 Brampton 21,178,343 Brantford 1,588,225 Brockville 117,406 Burlington 1,998,829 Chapleau 3,303 Chatham-Kent 218,274 Xxxxxxxx-Rockland 151,450 Cobourg 111,288 Cochrane 6,495 Collingwood 221,294 Cornwall 804,007 Cramahe 2,904 Deseronto 17,040 Dryden 4,471 Durham Region 10,498,424 Xxxxxx et Al 1,510 Elliot Lake 103,316 Espanola 5,456 Fort Erie 57,921 Fort Xxxxxxx 21,404 Greater Sudbury 4,394,171 Greenstone 2,017 Guelph 6,433,333 Halton Hills 62,748 Hamilton 22,586,728 Hanover 33,941 Hearst 11,508 Huntsville 28,966 Ingersoll 3,969 Kapuskasing 17,662 Kawartha Lakes 104,633 Kenora 68,202 Kingston 4,739,417 Lanark County 16,900 LaSalle 3,132 Leamington 28,492 London 22,641,496 Loyalist Township 99,298 Machin 968 Marmora and Lake 4,554 Meaford 4,449 Metrolinx 65,546,623 Midland 54,333 Milton 433,282 Mississauga 37,463,426 Niagara Falls 2,289,640 Niagara Region 205,643 Niagara-on-the-Lake 16,457 Norfolk County 7,123 North Bay 1,606,582 North Perth 8,376 Oakville 2,931,278 Orangeville 112,709 Orillia 758,405 Ottawa 97,401,971 Xxxx Sound 203,598 Parry Sound 1,028 Peel 618,508 Pembroke 14,479 Perth East 11,797 Peterborough City 3,445,120 Peterborough County 2,649 Point Xxxxxx 25,970 Port Colborne 26,417 Port Hope 62,674 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx County 7,945 Quinte West 90,132 Renfrew 38,901 Xxxxxxx 52,524 Sarnia 1,224,552 Sault Ste Xxxxx 1,924,429 Xxxxxxxxx 1,861 St. Catharines 5,...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Transit. Manitoba municipalities spent a total of $23.7million on 32 public transit projects. Projects included: purchase of transit buses, handi-transit vehicles, installation of bus shelters and electronic signs, refurbishing a major bus terminal and transit building, installing fare collection boxes, and other transit capital assets (priority signals/queue jumpers). Projects under this category resulted in improved energy use, cleaner air and reduced GHG emissions. Municipalities also reported improvements in passenger service, passenger amenities and overall transit performance. Total # of projects 32 Total GTF/PTF used* $23.7 million Total funds levered $142.8 million Total project Costs $166.5 million  44 transit buses purchased  6 handi-transit vehicles purchased  1 stage of the Southwest Rapid Transit Corridor completed in the City of Winnipeg  592 new fare collection boxes installed  1 transit building refurbished  1 major transit terminal refurbished  3 projects to upgrade bus stops/shelters and electronic signs *Federal PTF Included in the $23.7 million spent is $10.8 million in federal PTF allocations provided as a one-time federal transfer in 2005 for municipal transit infrastructure. Funds were allocated to the four cities in Manitoba with transit systems at the time – Cities of Winnipeg, Brandon, Thompson and Flin Flon. These municipalities held most of the funds in reserve for future eligible projects. Between 2009 and 2012, the four municipalities spent all the funds held in reserve on the following projects:  Winnipeg – purchase of 31 transit buses and upgrades to bus stops/shelters  Brandon – purchase of 11 transit buses  Xxxxxxxx – purchase of 2 transit buses  Flin Flon – installation of a bus shelter and signage
Public Transit. 1. The County shall be responsible for the administration, operation and management of the public transit system. 2. The CCOG shall be responsible for performing all RTPA functions as required by the TDA, FTA and other State and Federal programs. Any changes to CCOG's status as the Calaveras region's RTPA must be approved by the governing bodies of both Member Agencies.
Public Transit. A.5.1 OBJECTIVE The objective of this category is to construct, restore or improve public transportation Infrastructure that will result in the reduction of environmental impacts, congestion, energy use or GHG emissions, and improved safety, supports tourism and commerce, promotes social and economic development of local areas, and helps Canada lead in the use of innovative technologies for the operation and management of local transportation systems, including passenger and traffic information systems.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!