Request for Review of Position Sample Clauses

Request for Review of Position. ‌ A. When an Employee, or the Union acting on behalf of an Employee, feels that the duties and responsibilities of his/her position are not accurately reflected in the job description, the Employee or Union will complete a Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ) and submit it to the Employee’s immediate supervisor. The supervisor shall review and comment on the PDQ within fifteen (15) working days and then forward it to the Department Director. The Department Director shall review and comment on the PDQ within fifteen (15) working days and then forward it to the Human Resources Director for review and audit. Human Resources shall provide a copy to the Union. The Employee and/or Union shall have the opportunity to discuss the proposed job description changes and express any concerns, priorities, and recommendations. B. For the purposes of determining appropriate grade level placement, a committee consisting of the Human Resources Director and one other management representative and two Union representatives shall review the revised job description and PDQ and make a salary level recommendation to the Human Resources Director. The Human Resources Director will render a written report of his/her decision within three (3) months after receipt of the PDQ. Any retroactive pay due to an Employee shall be paid from the date the PDQ was received in the Human Resources Department. If a mutually agreeable resolution is not achieved, any further appeal shall be submitted to arbitration as set forth in Article 15, Grievance Procedure.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Request for Review of Position. Requests for review of position may be initiated by any classified employee and submitted to the district superintendent for review. Upon receipt of such request, the superintendent/designee shall evaluate the request and provide the employee a written response within twenty (20) working days.
Sample 1Sample 2
Request for Review of Position. ‌ When an employee, or the FNSBEA acting on behalf of an employee, feels that the duties and responsibilities of his/her position are not accurately reflected in the job description, the Employee will complete a Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ) and submit it to the Human Resources Director for distribution to the Department Director for review and comment. When completed by the Director, the PDQ shall be returned to Human Resources for review and audit. A copy shall be provided to the FNSBEA. The Employee will be provided the opportunity to review and provide written comments on the draft job description before it is presented to the Job Evaluation Review Committee. Any Employee written comments shall be provided to the Job Evaluation Review Committee in the PDQ information packet. For the purposes of determining appropriate grade placement, a committee consisting of the Human Resources Director and one other management representative and two FNSBEA representatives, shall review the revised job description and PDQ and make a grade placement recommendation to the Human Resources Director. The Human Resources Director will render a written report of his/her decision within forty-five (45) calendar days after receipt of the director’s comments. Any retroactive pay due to an employee shall be paid 30 days from the date the PDQ was submitted by the employee or union to the Human Resources Department. If a mutually agreeable resolution is not achieved, any further appeal shall be submitted to arbitration as set forth in Article 10, Grievance Procedure.
Sample 1

Related to Request for Review of Position

  • Request for Review Within sixty (60) days after receiving notice from the Plan Administrator that a claim has been denied (in part or all of the claim), then claimant (or their duly authorized representative) may file with the Plan Administrator, a written request for a review of the denial of the claim. The claimant (or his duly authorized representative) shall then have the opportunity to submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim. The Plan Administrator shall also provide the claimant, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the claimant’s claim for benefits.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Request for Hearing The employee must file a written request for hearing within fifteen calendar days of receipt of the Notice of Dismissal or Suspension. Filing means receipt in the office designated no later than regular close of business on the last day of the filing period. Failure to file such request in a timely manner shall be deemed a waiver of the right to a hearing and the proposed action shall be effective upon action by the Governing Board without notice or hearing except as may be required in a board meeting agenda.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Request for a Panel 1. Unless the Parties agree on a different period for consultations, a complaining Party may request in writing the establishment of a Panel if the consultation referred to in the Article 176 (Consultations) fails to resolve a matter within 60 days, after the date of receipt of the request for consultations or 50 days in case of urgent matters. 2. The complaining Party shall deliver the request to the other Party, indicating at least, the reason of the request, the identification of the measure, an indication of the provision of this Agreement that it considers relevant and an indication of the legal basis of the complaint. The Panel will be considered as established on the date of receipt of the corresponding request to the other Party. 3. Unless otherwise agreed by the disputing Parties, the Panel shall be selected and perform its functions in a manner consistent with the provisions of this Chapter.

  • Justification for the Request The request for a supplemental funding for any of the above-mentioned programs should contain a justification clearly documenting the need for the additional funding authority during the current quarter. This documentation should be in the form of State accounting records or similar documents that will show the actual expenditures through the most recent month for which such data are available, as well as the State's most accurate projection of its anticipated expenditures during the remaining month(s) of the quarter. For either the TANF or the CCDF program, the State's justification should also include an explanation of the activities requiring the obligation and/or expenditure of amounts that exceed the normal quarterly grant award restrictions and why these activities could not have been delayed until the next quarter.

  • Request for Proposals A State request inviting proposals for Goods or Services. This Contract shall be governed by the statutes, regulations and procedures of the State of Connecticut, Department of Administrative Services.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!