Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the County does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision of the County after the steps in Section 2. or
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions.
A. If the Superior Court does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision as approved by the Superior Court after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than five (5) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included.
B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the Superior Court and used by the Superior Court for documenting its classification decisions.
C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Superior Court Human Resources Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate.
D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision at Step 4 of the procedure described in Section 3., above.
E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analysis for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of Superior Court and OCEA members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the Superior Court and OCEA.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the Union does not agree with a position classification decision of the County after completion of Steps 3 and 4, above, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than twenty-five (25) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year pursuant to this Article, except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included.
B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the County and used by the County for documenting its classification decisions.
C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the County and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate.
D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision of the County at Step 4 of the procedure described in Section 3., above.
E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analyses for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of County and Union members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the County and the Union.
F. The appeal process set forth in this Section is the exclusive method under which classification decisions may be appealed. Consequently, at the conclusion of the process set out in this section, the matter shall be considered closed, and the employee and Teamsters Local 952 shall have no further remedy under this MOU, County ordinances, rules or procedures.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the County does not respond at the end of one hundred twenty (120) days or if the Union does not agree with a position classification decision of the County, after the steps in Section 2. have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than twenty-five (25) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year.
B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the County and used by the County for documenting its classification decisions.
C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Personnel Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate.
D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision of the County at Step 6 of the procedure described in Section 2., above.
E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analyses for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of County and IUOE members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the County and IUOE.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the County does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision of the County after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than fifty (50) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included.
B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the County and used by the County for documenting its classification decisions.
C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Human Resources Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate.
D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision of the County at Step 4 of the procedure described in Section 3., above.
E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analyses for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of County and OCEA members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the County and OCEA.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. A. If the County does not respond at the end of one hundred twenty (120) days or if the Union does not agree with a position classification decision of the County, after the steps in Section 2. have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than twenty-five (25) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year.
B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the County and used by the County for documenting its classification decisions.
C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Human Resource ServicesPersonnel Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate.
D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision of the County at Step 6 of the procedure described in Section 2., above.
Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions.
A. If the Union does not agree with a position classification decision of the County after completion of Steps 3 and 4, above, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than twenty-five (25) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year pursuant to this Article, except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included.
B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the County and used by the County for documenting its classification decisions.
C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the County and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate.
