Review Stage Sample Clauses

Review Stage. The Board of Education of the City School District of Xxxx Cove or its designee or designees shall act as appeal board to review and determine appeals from the determination of the chief supervisor or administrator or his designee. The procedure of the review stage shall be as follows: a. The aggrieved employee may, within 7 days of the determination by the chief supervisor or administrator, make a written request to the Board for review and determination of the case. b. The chief supervisor or administrator, upon request of the Board, shall submit all written statements and records of the case to the Board. c. The Board may hold a hearing to obtain further information regarding the case. d. The Board shall render a final decision within 15 days after receiving the request for review.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review Stage. All appeals submitted will first be checked administratively to ensure that the result issued is correct and that the correct process has been followed. Employees will be notified immediately if there is a correction at this stage. Trade Union members are advised to seek advice from their Trade Union before they submit an appeal. At all stages of the procedure an employee may seek support from one of the signatory trade unions or a colleague. Support will be offered to employees who experience problems completing the form.
Review Stage. 3.2.1 If an employee disagrees with the content of the evaluation result (i.e. in terms of their score or assimilation outcome) they should submit their appeal in writing within 12 weeks of implementation date of the new pay and grading structure, to the Job Evaluation team. The submission must also include the appropriate completed forms, full reasons for the appeal and all relevant supporting evidence 3.2.2 The relevant Head of Service/Operational Manager/Head Teacher will make comments, as appropriate on the submission, sign and forward it to the Job Evaluation team within 2 weeks of receipt where possible. 3.2.3 Other concerns about the job evaluation process or outcome should be referred directly to Stage 1 of this appeals procedure.
Review Stage. On 10th October 2017, the Council considered the draft LDP Review Report and agreed that a full review of the LDP was necessary. The LDP Review Report will be consulted upon and then submitted to WG prior to the commencement of the RLDP.
Review Stage. If the grievance is not resolved at Step II, either party (the District or the Association only) may refer the dispute to advisory arbitration within ten working days after the Step II decision, by providing written notice thereof to the other party (the Superintendent or the President of the Association). Thereafter, the parties shall attempt to mutually agree on the appointment of an arbitrator and, if they cannot so agree, either party may request the American Arbitration Association (hereinafter, the “AAA”) to appoint an arbitrator pursuant to its Rules. It is specifically agreed that no individual Association member has the right to process a matter to this Review Stage.

Related to Review Stage

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Review Systems The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain and utilize an electronic case management system to manage the Tests and provide systematic control over each step in the Review process and ensure consistency and repeatability among the Tests.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!