Review Stage Sample Clauses

Review Stage. 3.2.1 If an employee disagrees with the content of the evaluation result (i.e. in terms of their score or assimilation outcome) they should submit their appeal in writing within 12 weeks of implementation date of the new pay and grading structure, to the Job Evaluation team. The submission must also include the appropriate completed forms, full reasons for the appeal and all relevant supporting evidence
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review Stage. On 10th October 2017, the Council considered the draft LDP Review Report and agreed that a full review of the LDP was necessary. The LDP Review Report will be consulted upon and then submitted to WG prior to the commencement of the RLDP.
Sample 1
Review Stage. All appeals submitted will first be checked administratively to ensure that the result issued is correct and that the correct process has been followed. Employees will be notified immediately if there is a correction at this stage. Trade Union members are advised to seek advice from their Trade Union before they submit an appeal. At all stages of the procedure an employee may seek support from one of the signatory trade unions or a colleague. Support will be offered to employees who experience problems completing the form.
Sample 1
Review Stage. The Board of Education of the City School District of Xxxx Cove or its designee or designees shall act as appeal board to review and determine appeals from the determination of the chief supervisor or administrator or his designee. The procedure of the review stage shall be as follows:
Sample 1
Review Stage. (1) If the grievance is not resolved at Step II, either party (the District or the Association only) may refer the dispute to advisory arbitration within ten working days after the Step II decision, by providing written notice thereof to the other party (the Superintendent or the President of the Association). Thereafter, the parties shall attempt to mutually agree on the appointment of an arbitrator and, if they cannot so agree, either party may request the American Arbitration Association (hereinafter, the “AAA”) to appoint an arbitrator pursuant to its Rules. It is specifically agreed that no individual Association member has the right to process a matter to this Review Stage.
Sample 1

Related to Review Stage

  • Review Stages The Project Architect shall submit documents to the Owner for review at completion of the Schematic Design Phase, Design Development Phase and at the following stages of completion of the Construction Documents Phase as follows: 50%, 75%, 100%

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • STAGE If the is not satisfied with the decision of the Chair or designee or if a decision is not received within the specified time limits, the may apply to the Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board for a hearing of the grievance within five (5) days of the date received the decision or within five (5) days of the expiration of the specified time limit for receiving a decision. An employee claiming has been dismissed without just cause shall be entitled to file a grievance commencing at STAGE provided does so within ten (10) days of the date of the dismissal. The Union shall have the right to lodge a grievance based on a difference arising directly with the Employer. However, such a grievance shall not include any matter upon which an employee is personally entitled to grieve. Such grievance shall first be presented, in writing, to the Employer within twenty (20) days of the circumstances giving rise to the grievance. A meeting between representatives of the Union and the Employer will be held within ten days of receipt of the grievance. The grievance shall be answered in writing by the Employer within ten days of such meeting, following which or failing settlement of the grievance, the Union may submit the grievance to the Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board within a further period of ten days. The Employer shall have the right to lodge a grievance as defined above or relating to the conduct of the Union or any officer or representative of the Union or the conduct of the employee. Such grievance shall first be presented, in writing, to the Union within twenty (20) days of the circumstances giving rise to the grievance. A meeting between representatives of the Union and the Employer will be held within ten days of receipt of the grievance. The grievance shall be answered in writing by the Union within ten days of such meeting, following which or failing settlement of the grievance, the Employer may submit the grievance to the Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board within a further period of ten days. The Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board shall not be authorized to alter, modify or amend any part of this Agreement nor shall the Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board give any decision inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement. The determination of a grievance by the Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board pursuant to the terms of this Agreement is final and binding upon the parties and the employees covered by this Agreement. At any STAGE of the Grievance Procedure, the time limits imposed upon either party may be extended, in writing, by mutual agreement. As an alternative to the procedures described at STAGE in Article the parties may choose to proceed with final disposition of a grievance by the use of Mediation/ Arbitration. This alternative shall be implemented within the provisions of Appendix of this Agreement and agreed as being in conformity with the provisions of Article of this Agreement. Where a grievance is not processed within the time allowed or has not been processed by the employee or the Union within the time prescribed it shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

  • Review and Appeal (a) Each Party shall establish or maintain judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose of the prompt review and, where warranted, correction of final administrative actions regarding matters covered by this Treaty. Such tribunals shall be impartial and independent of the office or authority entrusted with administrative enforcement and shall not have any substantial interest in the outcome of the matter.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!