Scope of Evaluation. The performance evaluation process shall apply to both permanent and probation period NAGE employees.
Scope of Evaluation. No evaluation of an employee shall include any duty that is not fixed and prescribed for the job classification of the employee by the District’s Board of Trustees pursuant to the California Education Code, and no employee shall be assigned or required to perform any duty that is not reasonably related to the mission of the District. No arbitrary or capricious evaluation shall be issued to any employee covered by this Agreement.
Scope of Evaluation. The evaluation of faculty shall be limited to the evaluatee’s primary areas of responsibility. The main items for consideration in evaluation of faculty are:
Scope of Evaluation. 11.6.1.1 Each evaluation cycle will cover two Standards. After consultation, the teacher and the evaluator shall each select one standard. In addition, by mutual agreement, a third Standard may be included. If, over the course of the year's evaluation process the evaluator has concerns falling outside these two or three standards, such concern shall be communicated in the comments section of the evaluation form.
Scope of Evaluation. The evaluation undertaken by the Purchasers may include (but shall not be restricted to): a the processes outlined in this Agreement and used in the ongoing management of the Services; b the prices of the Services provided in relation to the outcomes;
Scope of Evaluation. A forensic psychological evaluation consists of utilizing a variety of techniques for determining and then documenting an individuals’ psychological status. These techniques include clinical interviews, mental status examinations, psycho-diagnostic testing, review of relevant records, interviews with collateral sources, research, conferences with attorneys or others, and preparation of written report if requested. Once the evaluation is complete, I may be asked to provide testimony in a deposition or a court.
Scope of Evaluation. Corridor transit services are separated into two tiers for evaluation purposes: Tier 1: Transit services that are part of the UPA project are defined as Tier 1 services. These services are likely to experience changes in performance (service capacity, travel time, reliability, etc) that are aimed at stimulating increased ridership and transit mode share. These services require to be evaluated in full using all the data sources identified in the National and Local evaluation plans.
Scope of Evaluation. The evaluation should emphasize such factors as teaching or administrative skills, processes and techniques and interpersonal relationships with students, parents, peers and supervisors, as well as those additional factors which the school district considers relevant to the effective performance of its professional employees. The standards for performance must be measureable and relevant.
Scope of Evaluation. The evaluation process should focus primarily on the criteria detailed in the Teacher Effectiveness Handbook. The evaluation process must be sufficiently flexible to accommodate individual teacher responsibilities, needs, and teaching styles. Using the current evaluation document and the Teacher Effectiveness Handbook, recommendations for continued employment, recommendations for continued employment with conditions, or not recommended for continued employment shall be based on the results of formal and informal evaluations. The code of Professional Ethics (SDCL 24:08:03) is incorporated herein as criteria subject to evaluation and comment.
