Scope of Evaluation. The performance evaluation process shall apply to both permanent and probation period NAGE employees.
Scope of Evaluation. No evaluation of an employee shall include any duty that is not fixed and prescribed for the job classification of the employee by the District’s Board of Trustees pursuant to the California Education Code, and no employee shall be assigned or required to perform any duty that is not reasonably related to the mission of the District. No arbitrary or capricious evaluation shall be issued to any employee covered by this Agreement.
Scope of Evaluation. The evaluation of faculty shall be limited to the evaluatee’s primary areas of responsibility. The main items for consideration in evaluation of faculty are:
a. Effectiveness in working with students.
b. Expertise in subject matter and/or areas of responsibility.
c. Techniques of instruction, counseling, student health services, or library practices.
d. Fulfillment of professional responsibilities.
Scope of Evaluation. 11.6.1.1 Each evaluation cycle will cover two Standards. After consultation, the teacher and the evaluator shall each select one standard. In addition, by mutual agreement, a third Standard may be included. If, over the course of the year's evaluation process the evaluator has concerns falling outside these two or three standards, such concern shall be communicated in the comments section of the evaluation form.
Scope of Evaluation. The evaluation undertaken by the Purchasers may include (but shall not be restricted to): a the processes outlined in this Agreement and used in the ongoing management of the Services; b the prices of the Services provided in relation to the outcomes;
Scope of Evaluation. A forensic psychological evaluation consists of utilizing a variety of techniques for determining and then documenting an individuals’ psychological status. These techniques may include clinical interviews, mental status examinations, psycho-diagnostic testing, review of relevant records, interviews with collateral sources, research, conferences with attorneys or others, and preparation of written report if requested. Once the evaluation is complete, I may be asked to provide testimony in a deposition or a court.
Scope of Evaluation. The evaluation shall take into consideration the school district’s philosophies and objectives, the environment within the school community, and population conditions under which the teacher acts. Competency shall be based solely on the results of evaluation.
Scope of Evaluation. Building administrators will be evaluated on the comprehensive evaluation once every six years. Building administrators who were proficient and/or distinguished will be placed on a focused evaluation.
a. Building administrators on the comprehensive evaluation will be evaluated on all eight of the AWSP criterion.
b. Building administrators on the focused evaluation will be evaluated on one of the eight AWSP criterion. Building administrators on the focused evaluation will mutually agree on the criterion with their evaluator.
c. Newly hired building administrators who have successfully completed the comprehensive evaluation (3 years of Proficient or Distinguished) in his/her prior Washington State School District may be moved to the focused evaluation after successfully completing the comprehensive evaluation (Proficient or Distinguished) during his/her first year in the Kent School District.
Scope of Evaluation. The scope of this evaluation will mainly focus on the “Human Rights Education in Burma” project interventions, which cover the project period.
