Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking Sample Clauses

Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking. Bold italicized values exceeded the guideline percentages.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking. The daily flows through the individual Shark River Slough structures and S334 from July 2001 through June 2003 are presented in Figure 4a. Since mid- November 2002 inflows to Shark River Slough have been through S333 and S12D. Beginning in mid-January 2003 a large proportion of the flow in the L29 Canal was released from the system through S334 due to above-average rainfall. This condition lasted until mid-June. The relationship between the sum of the daily flows at Shark River Slough structures and corresponding flow-weighted mean total phosphorus concentrations for individual sampling events is presented in Figure 4b. Values for Water Years 2001 and 2002 follow the strong inverse relationship between flow and total phosphorus concentration expected for waters entering the Park through Shark River Slough. However, during the un-seasonal rainfall conditions that occurred from February through June 2003, total phosphorus concentrations were greater and more variable, 9 to 18 ppb, than observed previously when flows were less than 500 cfs. S333 S12C S12A S12D S12B S334 8000 7000 6000 4500 50 4000 45 3500 40 3000 35 30 2500 25 2000 20 1500 15 1000 10 500 5 0 0 Flow (cfs) FWMC Phosphorus Figure 4. A. Daily flows into Shark River Slough by structure. B. The relationship between daily flow at Shark River Slough structures and the corresponding flow-weighted mean total phosphorus concentrations for individual sampling events. Under the Consent Decree, a single total phosphorus long-term limit of 11 ppb, to be met by December 31, 2006, was set for the two points of inflow to Taylor Slough (S332 and S175) and the inflow point to the Coastal Basins (S18C). The 11 ppb limit applies to the water year ending September 30. Beginning in August 1999, structure S332D, a new pump station constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), began operation. The structure is adjacent to spillway S174 and pumps water from the L31N canal into the L31W canal. The S332D and S174 structures became the new inflow compliance monitoring sites for Taylor Slough on October 1, 1999, replacing S332 and S175. The USACE completed construction of the remaining C-111 project structures and detention areas along the eastern boundary of the ENP in June 2002. The project was authorized by the USACE in 1995 to restore more natural hydrologic conditions in Taylor Slough and to maintain flood protection to the east of the L31N and C-111 canals. Project facilities consist of pump stations S332B...
Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking. 12-Month Period Ending On Total Period Flow Flow Weighted Mean Total Phosphorus (ppb) Interim Limit (ppb) Long Term Limit (ppb) Percent of Sampling Events Greater than 10 ppb (%) (Kac-ft) Effective 10/1/2003 Effective 12/31/2006
Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking. Notes: Italicized values exceeded allowed percentage 12-Month Period Ending On Total Period Flow Flow Weighted Mean Total Phosphorus Interim Limit (ppb) Long Term Limit (ppb) Percent of Sampling Events Greater than 10 ppb 31-Oct-01 503.2 13.0 11.8 10.5 55.2 68.4 30-Nov-01 600.0 11.5 11.3 10.0 52.1 57.9 31-Dec-01 688.8 11.0 10.9 9.5 49.8 52.6 31-Jan-02 707.8 10.9 10.8 9.4 49.3 52.6 28-Feb-02 741.3 10.7 10.6 9.2 48.3 45.0 31-Mar-02 809.5 10.5 10.3 8.9 46.9 40.9 30-Apr-02 829.9 10.5 10.3 8.8 46.3 40.9 31-May-02 833.5 10.5 10.2 8.7 46.3 43.5 30-Jun-02 839.6 10.5 10.2 8.7 46.1 40.9 31-Jul-02 958.5 10.9 9.7 8.1 43.1 45.8 31-Aug-02 1003.2 9.1 9.6 7.9 42.3 39.1 30-Sep-02 1048.1 8.8 9.4 7.7 41.4 30.4 31-Oct-02 999.9 8.9 9.6 7.9 42.6 30.4 30-Nov-02 884.5 9.4 10.0 8.5 45.4 34.8 31-Dec-02 802.2 9.6 10.4 8.9 47.4 33.3 31-Jan-03 831.1 9.5 10.3 8.8 46.7 34.8 28-Feb-03 843.6 9.7 10.2 8.7 46.9 39.1 31-Mar-03 812.1 9.9 10.3 8.9 47.6 47.8 30-Apr-03 832.1 9.9 10.2 8.8 47.5 43.5 31-May-03 871.3 10.0 10.1 8.6 47.0 45.8 30-Jun-03 901.1 10.2 10.0 8.4 46.4 50.0 31-Jul-03 891.3 9.8 10.0 8.5 47.1 50.0 31-Aug-03 839.3 9.9 10.2 8.7 48.3 50.0 30-Sep-03 850.1 10.0 10.2 8.7 47.8 50.0 8000 7000 A 6000 5000 Figure 3. A. Daily flows into Shark River Slough by structure. Sep-03 Aug-03 Jul-03 Jun-03 May-03 Apr-03 Mar-03 Feb-03 Jan-03 Dec-02 Nov-02 Oct-02 Sep-02 Aug-02 Jul-02 Jun-02 May-02 Apr-02 Mar-02 Feb-02 Jan-02 Dec-01 Nov-01 Oct-01 Daily Flow (cfs) Total Phosphorus (ppb) Sep-03 Aug-03 Jul-03 Jun-03 May-03 Apr-03 Mar-03 Feb-03 Jan-03 Dec-02 Nov-02 Oct-02 Sep-02 Aug-02 Jul-02 Jun-02 May-02 Apr-02 Mar-02 Feb-02 Jan-02 Dec-01 Nov-01 Oct-01 Total Phosphorus (ppb) Total Phosphorus (ppb) A B Figure 4. Total phosphorus flow- weighted mean concentrations (fwmc) in inflows to Everglades National Park through Taylor Slough and the Coastal Basins. A. The 12-month moving average fwmc at the end of each water year compared to the 11 ppb long- term total phosphorus limit. Sep-03 Aug-03 Jul-03 Jun-03 May-03 Apr-03 Mar-03 Feb-03 Jan-03 Dec-02 Nov-02 Oct-02 Sep-02 Aug-02 Jul-02 Jun-02 May-02 Apr-02 Mar-02 Feb-02 Jan-02 Dec-01 Nov-01 Oct-01 B. The 12-month moving average fwmc at the end of each month and the composite total phosphorus concentration for each sampling event.
Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking. The daily flows through the individual Shark River Slough structures and S334 from April 2001 through March 2003 are presented in Figure 4a. Beginning in November 2002 a sharp decrease in flow occurred at all structures. Flows were low between mid-November and mid-December, reaching a minimum of 161 cfs/day on December 16. Thereafter, flows into Shark River Slough steadily increased to a maximum of 953 cfs/day on January 9, 2003 and then slowly declined through the end of March. Water was removed from the system via S334 from January 17 through March 31, 2003. The relationship between the sum of the daily flows at Shark River Slough structures and the corresponding flow-weighted mean total phosphorus concentration for individual sampling events is presented in Figure 4b. Values for Water Years 2001 and 2002 follow the strong inverse relationship between flow and total phosphorus concentration expected for waters entering the Park through Shark River Slough. S333 S12C S12A S12D S12B S334 8000 7000 6000 4500 50 4000 3500 45 40 35 3000 30 2500 25 2000 20 1500 15 1000 10 500 5 0 Flow (cfs) FWMC Phosphorus Figure 4. A. Daily flows into Shark River Slough by structure. B. The relationship between daily flow at Shark River Slough structures and the corresponding flow-weighted mean total phosphorus concentrations for individual sampling events.
Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking. Table 2 also presents the moving flow-weighted mean concentrations for each 12-month period beginning in July 2000 as well as the corresponding interim and long-term total phosphorus concentration limits, calculated using the 12-month period flow. For the 12-month periods ending in April, May and June 2002, the flow- weighted mean total phosphorus concentrations were 10.5, 10.6 and
Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking. The daily flows through the individual Shark River Slough structures and S334 from October 2000 through September 2002 are presented in Figure 4a. A sharp increase in flow through all structures began in late June 2002. Total daily flows exceeded 2000 cfs from early July through September. The relationship between the sum of the daily flows at Shark River Slough structures and the corresponding flow-weighted mean total phosphorus concentration for individual sampling events is presented in Figure 4b. Higher flows correlate well with lower levels of total phosphorus. S333 S12D S12C S12B S12A S334 8000 7000 6000 4500 50 4000 45 3500 40 3000 35 30 2500 25 2000 20 1500 15 1000 10 500 5 0 0 Flow (cfs) FWMC Phosphorus Figure 4. A. Daily flows into Shark River Slough by structure. B. The relationship between daily flow at Shark River Slough structures and the corresponding flow-weighted mean total phosphorus concentrations for individual sampling events.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Shark River Slough Total Phosphorus Concentration Compliance Tracking

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where Xxxx has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to Xxxx. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for Xxxx (e.g. hairpinning): 1. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to any spare copper that exists to the customer premises. 2. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to an existing DLC that is not integrated. 3. If capacity exists, provide "side-door" porting through the switch. 4. If capacity exists, provide "Digital Access Cross Connect System (DACS)- door" porting (if the IDLC routes through a DACS prior to integration into the switch). 2.6.2 Arrangements 3 and 4 above require the use of a designed circuit. Therefore, non- designed Loops such as the SL1 voice grade and UCL-ND may not be ordered in these cases. 2.6.3 If no alternate facility is available, and upon request from Xxxx, and if agreed to by both Parties, BellSouth may utilize its Special Construction (SC) process to determine the additional costs required to provision facilities. Xxxx will then have the option of paying the one-time SC rates to place the Loop.

  • COVID-19 Vaccine Passports Pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code, Section 161.0085(c), Contractor certifies that it does not require its customers to provide any documentation certifying the customer’s COVID-19 vaccination or post-transmission recovery on entry to, to gain access to, or to receive service from the Contractor’s business. Contractor acknowledges that such a vaccine or recovery requirement would make Contractor ineligible for a state-funded contract.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CSTC chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CSTC’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CSTC to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG. 9.2.2 CSTC shall establish Access Toll Connecting Trunks pursuant to applicable access Tariffs by which it will provide Switched Exchange Access Services to Interexchange Carriers to enable such Interexchange Carriers to originate and terminate traffic to and from CSTC’s Customers. 9.2.3 The Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be two-way trunks. Such trunks shall connect the End Office CSTC utilizes to provide Telephone Exchange Service and Switched Exchange Access to its Customers in a given LATA to the access Tandem(s) Verizon utilizes to provide Exchange Access in such LATA. 9.2.4 Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be used solely for the transmission and routing of Exchange Access to allow CSTC’s Customers to connect to or be connected to the interexchange trunks of any Interexchange Carrier which is connected to a Verizon access Tandem.

  • SERVICE MONITORING, ANALYSES AND ORACLE SOFTWARE 11.1 We continuously monitor the Services to facilitate Oracle’s operation of the Services; to help resolve Your service requests; to detect and address threats to the functionality, security, integrity, and availability of the Services as well as any content, data, or applications in the Services; and to detect and address illegal acts or violations of the Acceptable Use Policy. Oracle monitoring tools do not collect or store any of Your Content residing in the Services, except as needed for such purposes. Oracle does not monitor, and does not address issues with, non-Oracle software provided by You or any of Your Users that is stored in, or run on or through, the Services. Information collected by Oracle monitoring tools (excluding Your Content) may also be used to assist in managing Oracle’s product and service portfolio, to help Oracle address deficiencies in its product and service offerings, and for license management purposes. 11.2 We may (i) compile statistical and other information related to the performance, operation and use of the Services, and (ii) use data from the Services in aggregated form for security and operations management, to create statistical analyses, and for research and development purposes (clauses i and ii are collectively referred to as “Service Analyses”). We may make Service Analyses publicly available; however, Service Analyses will not incorporate Your Content, Personal Data or Confidential Information in a form that could serve to identify You or any individual. We retain all intellectual property rights in Service Analyses. 11.3 We may provide You with the ability to obtain certain Oracle Software (as defined below) for use with the Services. If we provide Oracle Software to You and do not specify separate terms for such software, then such Oracle Software is provided as part of the Services and You have the non-exclusive, worldwide, limited right to use such Oracle Software, subject to the terms of this Agreement and Your order (except for separately licensed elements of the Oracle Software, which separately licensed elements are governed by the applicable separate terms), solely to facilitate Your use of the Services. You may allow Your Users to use the Oracle Software for this purpose, and You are responsible for their compliance with the license terms. Your right to use any Oracle Software will terminate upon the earlier of our notice (by web posting or otherwise) or the end of the Services associated with the Oracle Software. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Oracle Software is licensed to You under separate terms, then Your use of such software is governed by the separate terms. Your right to use any part of the Oracle Software that is licensed under the separate terms is not restricted in any way by this Agreement.

  • TOOL STORAGE 1. A company shall provide on all construction jobs in towns and cities, and elsewhere where reasonably necessary and practicable (or if requested buy the employee), a suitable and secure waterproof lock-up solely for the purpose of storing employees’ tools, and on multi-storey and major projects the company shall provide, where possible, a suitable lock-up for employees’ tools within a reasonable distance of the work area of large groups of employees. 2. Where an employee is absent from work because of illness or accident and has advised the company in accordance with Clause 33 – Personal Leave of the award, the company shall ensure that the employee’s tools are securely stored during his/her absence.

  • Signaling Link Transport 9.2.1 Signaling Link Transport is a set of two or four dedicated 56 kbps transmission paths between Global Connection-designated Signaling Points of Interconnection that provide appropriate physical diversity.

  • Computer Equipment Recycling Program If this Contract is for the purchase or lease of computer equipment, then Contractor certifies that it is in compliance with Subchapter Y, Chapter 361 of the Texas Health and Safety Code related to the Computer Equipment Recycling Program and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rules in 30 TAC Chapter 328.

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Hepatitis B Vaccine Where the Hospital identifies high risk areas where employees are exposed to Hepatitis B, the Hospital will provide, at no cost to the employees, a Hepatitis B vaccine.

  • Green Economy/Carbon Footprint a) The Supplier/Service Provider has in its bid provided Transnet with an understanding of the Supplier’s/Service Provider’s position with regard to issues such as waste disposal, recycling and energy conservation.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!