Socioeconomics. Additional students The applicant would Increases in school Increases in school would be added to the negotiate new development district enrollment would district enrollment, and Belmont and Sequoia agreements for additional be avoided. Demand for sewer and water demand, School Districts, but sewer and water demand. housing in the regional would be slightly reduced available capacity area would increase due in comparison to the exists to accommodate to the creation of a new proposed project. these students. Addi- employment center with no tional sewer capacity corresponding housing and water supply would provided. Sewer and water be needed. capacity would not be impacted since existing development agreements are adequate. Parks and Recreation New residents and work- Public recreation, park Impacts would be approx- Impacts would be approx- ers would use existing and shoreline access imately the same as for imately the same as for nearby recreational facilities would be in- the proposed project. the proposed project. facilities. cluded in the proposed development. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL PROJECT IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVES Impact Mitigation All Office Park Reduced Residential Density ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Traffic Additional project- Traffic improvement Additional daily traffic Additional daily traffic related traffic would measures include new would be greater than for would be less than for the result in deteriorated signal controls and the proposed project. proposed project. Deter- operating conditions at turn lanes. Deteriorated operating iorated operating con- identified local inter- conditions would occur at ditions would still occur sections. local intersections. at local intersections. Project development No mitigation identified. Impacts would be the same Impacts would be the same would preclude the as for the proposed as for the proposed construction of a project. project. Belmont Slough vehicle crossing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 353 [GEOMATRIX LOGO] ================================================================================ REVISED DISCHARGE MONITORING PLAN Westport Landfill Site Redwood City, California Prepared for Westport Investments May 1996 Projec...
Socioeconomics. Significance of an impact to socioeconomics varies with the setting of the proposed action, but 40 CFR 1508.8 states that indirect effects may include those that are growth inducing and others related to induce changes in the pattern of land use, population density, or growth rate. Under CEQ regulations, a socioeconomic impact can not be a sole cause for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement.
Socioeconomics. At the mouth of Padre Canyon, Citadel Estates, Eagle Rock, Alborada, and Copper Canyon subdivisions have been developed on either side of the Tuacahn Wash. According to Ivins City, these subdivisions consist of at least 150 units combined. Properties lie within 100-200 feet of the wash on either side and not within the floodplain itself. Tuacahn Drive and Center Street lie within the path of storm water and are heavily utilized by both residents of the subdivisions and other drivers coming to and from Ivins City and St. Xxxxxx. There are no detours around the intersection of Tuacahn Drive and Center Street that would be reliable and safe in the event of flooding. Tuacahn Drive also provides exclusive access to the Tuacahn Center for the Arts. City of Xxxxx Detention Basin Project 29 Environmental Assessment
Socioeconomics. The project would greatly reduce the potential for flooding and associated damage with the subdivisions. Tuacahn Drive and Center Street would also be less likely to flood, thus the project would provide a long-term and major benefit to residents of the subdivisions as well as users of Tuacahn Drive and Center Street. In addition, the project is not expected to affect incomes to State Parks or Ivins City as visitation rates to the area would not be reduced.
Socioeconomics. Relative to Alternative A, the detention dam proposed under Alternative C would detain less water. Relative to Alternatives A or B, flooding and subsequent damage to roads and property in the subdivisions may occur more frequently. Overall, Alternative C would provide a moderate benefit in terms of preventing flood damage. City of Xxxxx Detention Basin Project 35 Environmental Assessment
Socioeconomics. The Engineer shall perform Community Impact Assessments (including relocations and disproportionate impacts) in accordance with Executive Order 12898.
