Success Measures. Each coaching engagement will have individual and programmatic success measures. Client success measures will be determined during the contracting phase of the engagement. The coach, client, and sponsor will provide input on whether the measures have been met. All coaching engagements will include a beginning, midpoint and end pulse survey and an ROI evaluation will be conducted by the L&TD team.
Success Measures. The following shall be the success measures (each a “Success Measure” and, collectively, the “Success Measures”) upon which the Success Payments shall be based:
Success Measures. Commercial Services’ success in performing the services will be measured by a number of success criteria, using national performance indicators and a comparison of other performance indicators, obtained through benchmarking with other, similar authorities to York. Suggested Indicators, targets and comparison data are included in appendices 2 and 5.
Success Measures. Evaluation criteria will include: How far objectives for the intervention have been met Quality and appropriateness of planning and activity design as perceived by the participant and HMPS staff The range and quality of delivery staff provided The standard of delivery , including sensitivity to different learning styles, professionalism and effectiveness of individual deliverers and appropriateness of style The explicit referencing and reinforcement of the diversity and ethical management and leadership agendas The quality of evaluation and review information produced Administrative processes and their level of efficiency. and effectiveness
Success Measures. The following shall be the success measures (each a “Success Measure” and, collectively, the “Success Measures”) that the Service Provider shall focus upon in providing the Services hereunder:
i. “Therapist Adherence Measures (“TAM”) Score” shall have the meaning set forth in the Evaluation Plan. Service Provider understands that average TAM Scores for the Teams shall be measured at 0.61 or more (the “TAM Score Minimum Threshold”), pursuant to the Primary Contract. If, any Team falls below the TAM Score Minimum Threshold, based on six (6) months of TAM Scores, any voting member of the Governance Committee may request that the Lead Provider submit a corrective action plan to address the deficiency within sixty (60) days of such request. If such plan fails to improve the TAM scores during a span of six (6) months, the Governance Committee will review the performance of the Service Provider and may vote to terminate the Contract and the Primary Contract. Therefore, if the average TAM Scores for any Team falls below 0.61, based on six (6) months of TAM Scores, Service Prover shall engage in a corrective action plan if determined by the Lead Provider.
Success Measures. A successful pilot for the course must be run by 10th April 2012 at the latest or as agreed with the OFT Project Manager. The success of the pilot shall be measured by the following: • quality of the delivery of the course: course content and delivery meets the needs of the different grades of delegate • quality and pace of the practical sessions: effective practical application of course content to encompass a variety of learning styles • the quality of the facilitation by the tutors • understanding and credible execution of case study/role play • the impact of the course i.e. the transferability of the learning into every day work • 95% of delegate feedback scores 3 or above (5=excellent,4=good, 3=satisfactory) After evaluation of the pilot and any necessary re-design work by the OFT and/or supplier, the course will be ready to roll out from June 2012. This may involve a variation in some material, tutors or role players/actors following the pilot.
Success Measures. Through activities under component 1, the module is expected to contribute to an agreement and common understanding among ASEAN Member States concerning the implementation of the AFCC. This includes the alignment and harmonization of relevant ASEAN certification standards, fostering supportive framework conditions for forest governance and finance, as well as mutual learning and exchange of experiences among the Member States, notably on XXXX-plus issues. Through activities under component 2, the module is expected to promote coherent and coordinated regional policies and strategies to respond to climate change in ASEAN, with a focus on the agriculture and forestry sectors. This comprises recommendations for adaptation and mitigation in most vulnerable regions and key value chains, as well as the elaboration and implementation of a methodology for climate-proofing.
Success Measures. Installation of modular unit by January 1, 2025. • Provide services by December 1, 2025.
Success Measures. Outcomes will be measured through a review and evaluation process, to which the coach, the coachee and the line manager will contribute (with usual confidentiality and ethical safeguards), Evaluation criteria will include: How far objectives have been met Quality and appropriateness of coaching as perceived by the coachee The range and quality of coaches offered The standard of delivery of the coaching sessions delivered, including professionalism, effectiveness, appropriateness of style and timeliness The explicit referencing and reinforcement of the diversity and ethical management and leadership agendas Administrative processes and their level of efficiency. and effectiveness
Success Measures. In coming months, we will introduce measures to test awareness, understanding and intended behaviours around fraud and error
2.5 Developing our key messages/proposition