System criteria. A counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance system shall include risk-based policies and procedures that address, at a minimum, the following areas:
(1) The training of personnel.
(2) The inspection and testing of electronic parts, including criteria for acceptance and rejection. Tests and inspections shall be performed in accordance with accepted Government- and industry- recognized techniques. Selection of tests and inspections shall be based on minimizing risk to the Government. Determination of risk shall be based on the assessed probability of receiving a counterfeit electronic part; the probability that the inspection or test selected will detect a counterfeit electronic part; and the potential negative consequences of a counterfeit electronic part being installed (e.g., human safety, mission success) where such consequences are made known to the Contractor.
(3) Processes to abolish counterfeit parts proliferation.
(4) Risk-based processes that enable tracking of electronic parts from the original manufacturer to product acceptance by the Government, whether the electronic parts are supplied as discrete electronic parts or are contained in assemblies, in accordance with paragraph (c) of the clause at 252.246-7008, Sources of Electronic Parts (also see paragraph (c)(2) of this clause).
(5) Use of suppliers in accordance with the clause at 252.246-7008.
(6) Reporting and quarantining of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts. Reporting is required to the Contracting Officer and to the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) when the Contractor becomes aware of, or has reason to suspect that, any electronic part or end item, component, part, or assembly containing electronic parts purchased by the DoD, or purchased by a Contractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, the DoD, contains counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts. Counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts shall not be returned to the seller or otherwise returned to the supply chain until such time that the parts are determined to be authentic.
(7) Methodologies to identify suspect counterfeit parts and to rapidly determine if a suspect counterfeit part is, in fact, counterfeit.
(8) Design, operation, and maintenance of systems to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts. The Contractor may elect to use current Government- or industry-recognized...
System criteria. A counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance system shall include risk-based policies and procedures that address, at a minimum, the following areas:
(i) The training of personnel.
(ii) The inspection and testing of electronic parts, including criteria for acceptance and rejection. Tests and inspections shall be performed in accordance with accepted Government- and industry-recognized techniques (this includes but is not limited to the IDEA-STD-1010). Selection of tests and inspections shall be based on minimizing risk to the Buyer. Determination of risk shall be based on the assessed probability of receiving a counterfeit electronic part; the probability that the inspection or test selected will detect a counterfeit electronic part; and the potential negative consequences of a counterfeit electronic part being installed (e.g., human safety, mission success) where such consequences are made known to the Seller.
(iii) Inspection and testing of EEE parts shall be at minimum to the latest revision of the IDEA-STD-1010.
(iv) All suppliers of EEE parts shall have at minimum one (1) IDEA-ICE-3000 certified inspector.
(v) Processes to abolish counterfeit partsproliferation.
(vi) Risk-based processes that enable tracking of electronic parts from the original manufacturer to product acceptance, whether the electronic parts are supplied as discrete electronic parts or are contained in assemblies.
(vii) Use of suppliers in accordance with the DFAR 252.246-7008.
(viii) The use of Palomar Products, Inc. approved suppliers shall only be used for the purchase of electronic parts.
(ix) Brokers, Independent Distributors or test-houses that are on the Palomar Products Inc. Approved Supplier List (ASL) can procure parts from a non-approved Suppliers.
(x) All electronic parts procured from a Broker, Independent Distributor, or Test-house shall be tested to the requirements of the AS6081, and approved by Palomar Products, Inc. prior to use. The approved test report shall send a copy to Palomar Products, Inc. at the time of first shipment.
(xi) Reporting and quarantining of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts. Reporting is required at minimum to the Buyer and to the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) when the Seller becomes aware of, or has reason to suspect that, any electronic part or end item, component, part, or assembly containing electronic parts purchased by the Customer, or purchased by a Contractor for delivery ...
System criteria. The Contractor's property management system shall be in accordance with paragraph (f) of the contract clause at 48 CFR 52.245-1.
System criteria. In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall use—
(1) An Earned Value Management System (EVMS) that complies with the EVMS guidelines in the American National Standards Institute/Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748, Earned Value Management Systems (ANSI/EIA-748, current version at time of award); and
System criteria. The Contractor's accounting system shall provide for—
(1) A sound internal control environment, accounting framework, and organizational structure;
(2) Proper segregation of direct costs from indirect costs;
System criteria. The Contractor's purchasing system shall—
(1) Have an adequate system description including policies, procedures, and purchasing practices that comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (48 CFR Chapter 1) and the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 9);
(2) Ensure that all applicable purchase orders and subcontracts contain all flowdown clauses, including terms and conditions and any other clauses needed to carry out the requirements of the prime contract;
(3) Maintain an organization plan that establishes clear lines of authority and responsibility;
System criteria. The MMAS shall have adequate internal controls to ensure system and data integrity, and shall—
(1) Have an adequate system description including policies, procedures, and operating instructions that comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement;
(2) Ensure that costs of purchased and fab- ricated material charged or allocated to a contract are based on valid time-phased re- quirements as impacted by minimum/eco- nomic order quantity restrictions.
(i) A 98 percent bill of material accuracy and a 95 percent master production schedule accuracy are desirable as a goal in order to ensure that requirements are both valid and appropriately time-phased.
(ii) If systems have accuracy levels below these, the Contractor shall provide adequate evidence that—
(A) There is no material harm to the Gov- ernment due to lower accuracy levels; and
(B) The cost to meet the accuracy goals is excessive in relation to the impact on the Government;
(3) Provide a mechanism to identify, re- port, and resolve system control weaknesses and manual override. Systems should iden- tify operational exceptions, such as excess/ residual inventory, as soon as known;
(4) Provide audit trails and maintain records (manual and those in machine-read- able form) necessary to evaluate system logic and to verify through transaction test- ing that the system is operating as desired;
(5) Establish and maintain adequate levels of record accuracy, and include reconcili- ation of recorded inventory quantities to physical inventory by part number on a peri- odic basis. A 95 percent accuracy level is de- sirable. If systems have an accuracy level below 95 percent, the Contractor shall pro- vide adequate evidence that—
(i) There is no material harm to the Gov- ernment due to lower accuracy levels; and
(ii) The cost to meet the accuracy goal is excessive in relation to the impact on the Government;
(6) Provide detailed descriptions of cir- cumstances that will result in manual or system generated transfers of parts;
(7) Maintain a consistent, equitable, and unbiased logic for costing of material trans- actions as follows:
(i) The Contractor shall maintain and dis- close written policies describing the transfer methodology and the loan/pay-back tech- nique.
(ii) The costing methodology may be standard or actual cost, or any of the inven- tory costing methods in 48 CFR 9904.411– 50(b). The Contractor shall maintain consist- ency across all contract and cus...
System criteria. A counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance system shall include risk-based policies and procedures that address, at a minimum, the following areas:
1. The training of personnel.
2. The inspection and testing of electronic parts, including criteria for acceptance and rejection. Tests and inspections shall be performed in accordance with accepted Government- and industry-recognized techniques. Selection of tests and inspections shall be based on minimizing risk to the Government. Determination of risk shall be based on the assessed probability of receiving a counterfeit electronic part; the probability that the inspection or test selected will detect a counterfeit electronic part; and the potential negative consequences of a counterfeit electronic part being installed (e.g., human safety, mission success) where such consequences are made known to the Contractor.
System criteria. The MMAS shall have adequate internal controls to ensure system and data integrity, and shall—
(1) Have an adequate system description including policies, procedures, and operating instructions that comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement;
(2) Ensure that costs of purchased and fab- ricated material charged or allocated to a
