Technical Presentations Sample Clauses

Technical Presentations. The following presentations were made on current paleoseismic research and related activities in Utah (most presentations are available at xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx/xxx/xxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxx.xxx).  Searching for evidence of seismic events in lacustrine sediments of Utah Lake; Ron Harris and Quincy Nickens, Brigham Young University  Automated fault scarp offset analysis of the Nephi segment of the Wasatch fault, Utah, utilizing LiDAR derived, high resolution DEMs; Billie Smathers, University of Utah  Update: Paleoseismic investigation of the northern and southern strands of the Nephi segment; Chris DuRoss, Utah Geological Survey  Results of fault trenching at the Baileys Lake site, West Valley fault zone; Mike Hylland, Utah Geological Survey  Paleoseismology of the Salt Lake City segment and its seismologic relation to the West Valley fault zone; Chris DuRoss, Utah Geological Survey  Summary of recent consultant’s trench, Orange Street site, Taylorsville fault, West Valley fault zone; Mike Hylland, Utah Geological Survey  Testing the role of fault segmentation in limiting earthquake magnitudes – A targeted paleoseismic investigation along the structurally segmented Wasatch fault zone; Rich Briggs, U.S. Geological Survey  Bear River fault behavior – Clues provided by LiDAR; Suzanne Hecker, U.S. Geological Survey  Evaluation of the Quaternary history of the Joes Valley fault zone, Utah – Background and update; Joanna Redwine, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation  Update on GPS monitoring of the Wasatch fault; Robert Smith, University of Utah  Large liquefaction features and evidence for earthquakes induced by Lake Bonneville in Cache Valley – A progress report; Susanne Janecke, Utah State University  New surficial geologic mapping redefines the northernmost sections of the Washington fault zone in SW Utah and NW Arizona; Tyler Knudsen, Utah Geological Survey  Results – Paleoseismic trenching investigation of the Northern (Fort Pearce) section of the Washington fault zone, SW Utah and NW Arizona; Bill Lund, Utah Geological Survey  Preliminary results from a high resolution reflection profile at Hansel Valley, Utah; Pier Bruno, University of Utah/Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy  Update on Blue Castle seismic source and fault characterization studies; Dean Ostenaa, Fugro, Inc. (no Power Point presentation available)  Utah paleoseismic-related USGS NEHRP FTR report compilation and some new data resources; Steve Bowman, Utah Geological Survey...
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Technical Presentations. ▪ Canada and Newfoundland and Labrador Aqua Link (CANAL) Presentation – Xxxx Xxx Xxxx - CANAL was first developed as a pilot project through ResEau funding - It was developed as a tool to bring water quality data/information to Canadians - Its main goal is to convert information to knowledge - It is an innovative product that was achieved through partnership under the Agreement - There was a substantial exchange of expertise that allowed this project to work - The general public accesses CANAL through one web page, however, it is blended from federal and provincial xxxxxx - CANAL has also been repackaged and can be accessed through Google Earth - It is an ideal location to continue to add data /tools - CANAL web site is launched and is awaiting a press release under the Agreement - There was a lot of background work to develop CANAL (ie; convert Site Doc into database; convert spreadsheets into database; develop development pressures calculator; development and implementation of WQI protocols with VMV codes; etc.) - The weakest link with CANAL is the downloading of data from ENVIRODAT; it is not user-friendly and the data is out-of-date; it is not being updated and managed properly. - There was a lot of work initiated throughout the CANAL project, however, some of the work never got implemented into the web site (i.e. created an automated calculator but did not implement it; watershed rollup capacity of WQI scores not implemented; site-specific guidelines WQI calculator was developed but not implemented; etc) - NL continued to work in many areas as a result of CANAL (CANAL paper submitted in Dec 2005 awaiting a response; paper on relative ranking of WQMA sites using WQI submitted in Dec 2005 awaiting a response; integration of CANAL into GIS Intranet system) - There is a lot of work continuing that can be incorporated into the CANAL web site such as:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Technical Presentations. List of all technical presentations (in reverse chronological order) related to micro-ROS as input for the corresponding achieved KPI in Section 3.6 # Date Title Location Presenter(s) 2020 December, 16th micro-ROS: bringing ROS 2 to MCUs ROS-Industrial Conference 2020 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx December, 16th Advanced Execution Management in ROS 2 ROS-Industrial Conference 2020 Xxxxx Xxxxx November, 12th micro-ROS: bringing ROS 2 to MCUs ROS World 2020 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx November, 12th Powered by FIWARE Systems for Robotics-based Agile Manufacturing ROS World 2020 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx November, 11th Powered by FIWARE Systems for Agile Production ROS Embedded Working Group Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx October, 26th Powered by FIWARE Digital Twins for ROS, micro-ROS and OPC UA based robotics systems Joint FIWARE and ETSI ISG CIM Workshop on Digital Twins Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx September , 23rd FIWARE & micro-ROS "Enabling Robotics Systems on Micro-controllers" FIWARE Wednesday Webinars Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx September , 20th The rclc Executor: Domain-specific deterministic scheduling EMSOFT 2020 Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx mechanisms for ROS applications on microcontrollers September , 17th micro-ROS: Bringing ROS 2 into microcontrollers ROS 2 TSC Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx September , 16th micro-ROS benchmarking ROS2 Embedded WG #2 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx September , 1st micro-ROS: Bringing ROS 2 into microcontrollers ROS Real-Time Working Group Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx July, 22nd FIWARE Interfaces with Machine and Robots FIWARE Wednesday Webinar Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx July, 16th The micro-ROS tutorial at BOSCH BOSCH internal Workshop Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Moral Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx July, 7th Bringing micro-ROS to PX4-based flying systems PX4 Developers Summit Xxxxx Xxxxxx June, 27th Introduction to micro-ROS: getting started with Zephyr ROS Developers Day Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, 25th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers DIH² Webinar Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx June, 22th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers FIWARE TSC Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx June, 17th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers FIWARE Foundation webinar Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx June, 12th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers FIWARE Robotics Tech Roadmap WG Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx March, 4th OFERA Workshop on Overcoming Xxxxx Xxxxx the boundaries o...
Sample 1
Technical Presentations. 3.2.1. Integrated sustainable solid waste management in Ghana- Challenges and prospects This presentation was given Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxx of IWWA KNUST team. The outline for his presentation is as follows:  Background  Identified challenges  Finance  Running cost  Landfill  Demographic  Recycling  Some key questions  Conclusion He began his presentation with the following statistics on solid waste management in Ghana: • Huge waste generation – 12,000 tons per day • On the national scale 57.6 % of waste generated ends up at improper disposal site • Only about 70 % of waste generated in urban areas are collected • Practically no waste management system in place in rural areas • Only one engineered landfill in the country (Kumasi) • Uncoordinated recycling activities Having said this, he then identified some challenges affecting solid waste management in Ghana. The identified challenges are: • finance • running cost • availability of landfill • demographic • poor data collection • recycling He said waste management is very expensive. For example, the Accra Metropolitan Assembly spends GH₵ 500,000 annually on the management of solid waste. The high cost of solid waste management can be attributed to several reasons among them are; traffic situation in cities not helping, use of second hand trucks, poor maintenance culture and high fuel cost. He lamented that the country has no engineered landfill site for disposal of solid waste. As most residents are not willing to allow sitting of landfill sites close to them. As a result of this, he stated that there is indiscriminate dumping of solid waste at some supposed landfill sites by service providers. He stated that most wastes are not sorted at their source as such recycling of waste in Ghana is very low. Other reasons he gave to explain low output on recycling of waste are as follows; poor coordination of recycling activities, attention and focus should be on waste reduction, individuals should be encouraged to recycle their waste by giving them incentives
Sample 1
Technical Presentations. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx from DTU summarized the conclusions drawn during the Symposium and listed the many topics tackling blade erosion. He highlighted the typical challenges and indicated the five work directions that were identified. He concluded by answering the question “What can we learn from modelling?” and presented the main directions and their outputs. The most promising ones are structured coatings, AI & data management and the inclusion of manufacturing defects in models. Xxxxxxx Xxxx from ORE Catapult presented a research plan including industry needs: lifetime prediction and material solutions. She highlighted the role of recovery and stressed the need to understand real damage types and to standardize data analysis. The main challenge is to make rain erosion tests as close to reality as possible. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx from SGRE described how the failure modes caused by rotating arm rain erosion tests, with realistic speeds but accelerated rain, correlate well with field data (DuraLedge project). He presented state of the art modelling and mentioned further research needs towards understanding the governing parameters of blade erosion. According to him, the Cobra project represents a good starting point. Finally, he presented the existing leading- edge protection (LEP) types and research needs in this area as well, which lie mainly in the need for standardization within the industry. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx from University Cardenal Herrera – CEU started on presenting current results of his research on material properties and modelling; he tackled the erosion problem as an acoustic problem, investigating stress transmission through the different layers of a rigid body (blade model). This approach allows to decomplexify the model, and separates fatigue in two distinct categories: wear and delamination. Internal defects (bubbles) and their damping effect on the strain in LEP multilayer systems especially raised the interest of the audience. Xxxx X Xxxxx from Xxxxxxx University provided an overview and assessment of use of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) tool to estimate the leading-edge erosion (XXX) potential of a given location for current and future conditions. Results of simulations for the USA showed that, in regions prone to hail events, a curtailment of the turbine for 95 minutes per year could reduce the energy transfer from the environment to the blade by 96%! Forecasting these events could therefore contribute greatly to erosion mitigation. T...
Sample 1
Technical Presentations. The following presentations were made on current paleoseismic research and related activities in Utah: • Brigham City segment, trenching update; Tony Crone/Steve Personius, USGS • Washington fault northern segment, trenching update; Bill Lund/Tyler Knudsen, UGS • Washington fault Southern Beltway trenching investigation; Dave Simon, Simon - Bymaster, Inc. • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Utah fault studies update; Larry Anderson, USBR • Bear River fault zone, trenching update; Suzanne Hecker, USGS • Salt Lake City segment/West Valley fault zone investigation, progress report: Mike Hylland, UGS • Working Group on Utah Earthquake Probabilities; Ivan Wong, URS Corp. A scheduled presentation by Jim Evans, USU, on the East Cache fault zone trenching study was cancelled because Jim did not attend the meeting.
Sample 1

Related to Technical Presentations

  • TECHNICAL TASKS Products that require a draft version are indicated by marking “(draft and final)” after the product name in the “Products” section of the task/subtask. If “(draft and final)” does not appear after the product name, only a final version of the product is required. Subtask 1.1 (Products) describes the procedure for submitting products to the CAM.

  • Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications furnished on the CD are intended to establish the standards for quality, performance and technical requirements for all labor, workmanship, material, methods and equipment necessary to complete the Work. When specifications and drawings are provided or referenced by the County, these are to be considered part of the Scope of Work, and to be specifically documented in the Detailed Scope of Work. For convenience, the County supplied specifications, if any, and the Technical Specifications furnished on the CD.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • Billing Specifications 55.6.1 The Parties agree that billing requirements and outputs will be consistent with the Ordering & Billing Form (OBF) and also with Telcordia Technologies Billing Output Specifications (BOS).

  • Technical Support Services 2.1 The technical support services (the "Services"): Party A agrees to provide to Party B the relevant services requested by Party B, which are specified in Exhibit 1 attached hereto ("Exhibit 1").

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Technical Specifications and Drawings a) The Goods and Related Services supplied under this Contract shall conform to the technical specifications and standards mentioned in Section VI, Schedule of Requirements and, when no applicable standard is mentioned, the standard shall be equivalent or superior to the official standards whose application is appropriate to the Goods' country of origin.

  • DAF Specifications Developer shall submit initial specifications for the DAF, including System Protection Facilities, to Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO at least one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Initial Synchronization Date; and final specifications for review and comment at least ninety (90) Calendar Days prior to the Initial Synchronization Date. Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO shall review such specifications to ensure that the DAF are compatible with the technical specifications, operational control, and safety requirements of the Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO and comment on such specifications within thirty (30) Calendar Days of Developer’s submission. All specifications provided hereunder shall be deemed to be Confidential Information.

  • Technical Documentation Prior to commencement of the Tests on Completion, the Contractor shall supply to the Engineer the technical documentation as specified in the Employer’s Requirements. The Works or Section shall not be considered to be completed for the purposes of taking- over under sub-clause 10.1 [Taking Over of the Works and Sections] until the Engineer has received the technical documentation as defined in this sub-clause 5.7, the "history file" including design calculations and certain certification as well as any other documents required to meet the CE Marking requirements.

  • Technical Proposals Technical proposal information will be streamlined, e.g., the Government anticipates written proposals consisting of thirty (30) pages or less stating compliance or exception to requirements, risks, assumptions and conflict of interest issues. Proposals shall not merely restate PWS/SOO requirements. Written technical proposals shall normally address: * Technical Approach and descriptive narrative of the contractor's understanding of the requested effort * PWS in response to a SOO * Integrated Master Plan (if applicable) * Integrated Master Schedule (if applicable) * Key Personnel Assigned * Quantities/Hours of Personnel by Labor Categories and narrative justification (if applicable) * Other Direct Costs (ODCs) (materials and supplies, travel, training, etc.(quantities and types only)) * Period of Performance * Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE)/Government-Furnished Information (GFI) * Security (including clearance level) * Teaming Arrangement (including subcontracting; identify new ACAs) * Small Business Plan (if a large business) * Other Pertinent Data, such as assumptions made.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.